Future Food For Cities
September 10, 2010 by Derek Jacoby, Maggie Jack
Within the next decade you will be able to grow all of your vegetables in a box barely larger than your refrigerator. This surprising statement is the result of a class project at Singularity University this summer. Here’s how we came to believe that this is true.
In the first week at Singularity University, we were introduced to a team project called “Food for Cities.” The project was suggested as one way to meet a goal of Singularity University: to come up with solutions that can positively affect the lives of a billion people. It was only one of several projects that seemed interesting, but it aligned with our interest in organic gardening and sustainable food production. Coming from Vancouver Island in Canada (Derek) and Cambridge in England (Maggie), local food is a hot topic.
When it came time to make a final decision on projects, Food for Cities was our choice, along with four other students, two of them more business-focused – a Stanford MBA and a Danish businessman, a biotechnology student, and a guy with a background in bioinformatics. I (Maggie) come from a more academic background of history of science. I (Derek) am a computer science student at the University of Victoria and joined this team because I wanted to build a working prototype to take home and grow some food with.

Learn about the projects Singularity University (SU) students developed during its 2010 Graduate Studies Program, with SU Co-Founder and Chancellor Ray Kurzweil, SU Co-Founder & Chairman Peter Diamandis, and SU faculty head Dan Barry, three-time NASA astronaut.
Singularity University is an experiment at looking broadly across fields. We had real experts in a number of fields come and speak with us – biotechnology, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence and robotics, networking, future studies and forecasting, business and economics – and the first three weeks were a whirlwind of all-day lectures, late night conversations, and little sleep. We had some great speakers to ground us in our project. Lane Patterson, the engineer of the South Pole research station hydroponics growing facilities spoke to us about the challenge of growing fresh food in an environment that is cut off from the outside world for 8 months of the year.
“The Food for Cities team hopes Agropolis will encourage a worldwide movement towards sustainable, healthy food production, aimed ultimately at providing a viable solution for world hunger.”
John Hogan and Chris McKay, our two team advisors from NASA Ames, gave talks about their programs in planetary science and bioengineering advanced life support systems, and Dickson Despommier, of Columbia University, spoke to us about his vertical farming initiative. Christina Milesi, also of NASA Ames, spoke to us about declining worldwide food productivity as evidenced by satellite imagery.
As we listened to these speakers and dug into our project, it became clear that the current system of food production suffers from a number of serious problems. Due to unrestrained corn subsidies, it’s impossible to escape high-fructose corn syrup, which leads to obesity. As consumers rebel against the over-spraying of pesticides, manufacturers engineer pesticide into the plants themselves, leading to a justifiable fear of GMO crops. Our fields are over-fertilized and the runoff is causing increasing salt and heavy metal contamination that is turning our most fertile valleys into deserts.
California exports tomatoes to Europe; meanwhile the Netherlands export tomatoes to California. All the while, our population continues to grow, threatening to push our overstrained food supply and delivery infrastructure beyond its breaking point. Something has to change.
So we decided as a team to focus on the centralized nature of current food production. Today, in good growing conditions, it takes an estimated 16 square feet of garden space to provide just a single person with vegetables — and that’s more than exists in most city environments. Drawing on the controlled-agriculture experience of our advisors, we determined that the best technique to personalize food production without the use of large tracts of farmland was aeroponics. Most people are familiar with hydroponics, where the roots of the plant rest in a liquid nutrient bath, but fewer have heard of aeroponics, where the nutrient solution is vaporized into a fine mist.
Aeroponic gardens can save 90% of the water used in a conventional garden, and the growth rate can be 25% higher than in soil gardens because the oxygen levels in air are so much higher than in soil. An additional 40% boost to growth rates can be obtained by growing the plants in enriched CO2 atmospheres. This increased CO2 concentration has the additional benefit of discouraging pest infestations and bacterial contamination.
In collaboration with NASA, we instrumented our prototype gardens with sensors to measure nutrient levels, temperature, humidity, and pH. The acidity of the nutrient solution is especially critical to optimizing the nutrient uptake of the plants, and gives an important first warning sign of the growth of algae, which steal nutrients away from the plants. With this practical demonstration in hand, we proceeded to the main work of the summer: synthesizing all these fields of technology to create a picture of where food production was going. Our challenge was to figure out what the roadblocks were to efficient, decentralized food production, and with our clear view of the forthcoming technologies, figure out how to avoid those roadblocks.
The Agropolis solution
We determined that the first obstacle was the consumer perception of hydroponics and aeroponics. In our interviews, if consumers knew about them at all, they associated the technologies with pot farmers. It was our synthesis of the research in lighting and biotechnology that convinced us that a tipping point is coming where these technologies will economically apply to legal food crops. If that happens, and consumers still see field-grown organics as the only healthy and sustainable choice, these technologies will not break the current centralized model of food production. But if consumers realize that these new technologies allow them to take control of their own food production, food security and healthier food will be within everyone’s personal grasp.
The approach we decided on we’re calling “Agropolis,” a concept for a new kind of food creation and distribution system. In its first iteration, Agropolis will likely be a concept store and market where vegetables are grown on site. Although Agropolis will likely begin as one store, we believe that it will spark awareness of problems in the food system and the values of urban farming. It will also provide a location for increased research into controlled agriculture so that the technologies will advance and will be more easily scaled.
The first version of Agropolis will be like the first cell phone — big, bulky, imperfect, and available only to some. Just as cell phones are now available all around the world, Agropolis will facilitate the expansion of controlled and decentralized agriculture. The Food for Cities team hopes Agropolis will encourage a worldwide movement towards sustainable, healthy food production, aimed ultimately at providing a viable solution for world hunger.
Technological breakthroughs
Now let’s talk about some of the key technology changes that are making this possible. As lighting efficiencies continue to increase, natural sunlight can be supplemented and eventually replaced by artificial lighting. This is the step that allows us to save space by stacking our gardens, in trays up to six layers high in an average room. In lighting, organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) are approaching the 30% efficiency range, on par with the high-pressure sodium lamps used in greenhouses today. But OLEDs can provide light in a spectrum ideally suited to plant growth and can be placed much closer to the plant because they produce less excess heat while saving electricity.
Biotechnology also promises to change the picture:
- Today, biotech focuses on pest control, but in the controlled aeroponics environment, that is much less necessary, and genetic modifications can focus on other areas. Species of plants have recently been discovered that create a chlorophyll that is sensitive to low-energy red light. If this were introduced into food species, the lighting requirements could be dramatically lowered.
Bamboo grows at up to 60 cm per day, so if the genes responsible for this rapid growth were introduced into food crops, growth times could be drastically reduced. - We now have the technology to optimize plants for human nutrition — the success of golden rice is one example, but once we have tightly controlled growth conditions, the range of GMO manipulations is endless.
- Our food can grow precise quantities of our medicines, and produce nutrient profiles specifically tailored to our personal needs. Not to mention taste. The taste of the finest heirloom tomato is a function of genetics and growth conditions, but our commercial crops today have lost this due to a focus on varieties that can resist pests and ship well.
These advances, combined with the automation afforded by sensors and a well-designed control system, led our team to a relatively conservative reduction in the space required for one person’s vegetables: from 16 square feet down to five. And since we are getting that five square feet in multiple layers with artificial lighting, a grow box the size of your fridge no longer seems so unrealistic.
Comments (5)
by Ariane
Some things that popped into my head while reading this..
-Most fertilizers are synthetic, especially those where one needs to adjust the levels of individual NPK contents. Unfortunately most synthetic fertilizers are made from fossil fuel. As the plants are not grown in soil they would need more fertilizer then “regular” plants, making this pretty much unsustainable.
-Alot of plants actually cannot be grown in this fashion, fruits (most growing on trees and bushes), aswell as most root vegetables cannot be grown aeroponically (root vegetables because the roots develop as seen in the picture above, for carrots and most other root vegetables, where one main root is prefered this would not work)
Of course dwarf varieties of tomatoes and cucumbers could be grown in this fashion, but dwarf varieties still become at the minimum 8 inches tall for tomatoes, and at such sizes only grow a handful of cherry tomatoes.
Say your growing box is the size of an average refridgerator (130 cm tall) this would fit only 6 plants, assuming they are all as small as the smallest dward variety of tomato plants..
well, I don’t know about you guys, but not counting the time those plants need to grow, that would give me food for less then a week, not including grains and meat and fruit of course.
I am all for the local food trend, and even for aeroponics, but it would seem more feasible everyone with a garden would have a shed sized aeroponic building in their garden, and for everyone with no access to a garden each part of town would get a multistory building, where one could buy such produce.
As for the fertilizer problem, it would seem feasible that either all organic waste is composted by for example red wriggler worms, and this worm liquid is then fed back to the plants, or the plants be combined in a hydroponic fashion with fish, where the fish are fed by the plant run off and the plants by the fish droppings.
by jml
How do the energy requirements of this compare with the requirements of conventional farming? Obviously there are no transportation costs built directly into it, since it’s local. But you are using lights powered by electricity. How does that compare with the typical energy needs of conventional farm equipment?
by disgustedandamused
You’re on to something here. This can be seen as a re-invention of the refrigerator, or merger of intensive gardening with the refrigerator’s “crisper” compartment.
I’ve mused over this idea before — how to improve the state-of-the-art in kitchens by growing the food in the fridge, not just preserving what’s been grown elsewhere. Like refrigeration technology, this should prove capable of extensive product development, from apartment and dorm-room versions, to suburban household sizes, to restaurant/ institutional kitchen walk-in scale operations… Grocery stores might compete with this either by adopting their own, grown-on-site-fresh produce sections, or by selling starter kits for designer varieties of fruits and veggies to be transplanted to your home grow-room. In any case, getting this to the point of customer acceptance will mean thinking of this as an appliance product. I hope that doesn’t turn off too many transhumanist or sustainability types — product design should simply mean designing technologies to meet people as we really are.
For those intent on real household economic autonomy, if this can be combined with efficient water treatment (maybe water recycling as well as on-site rainwater harvesting), waste treatment (maybe a compost toilet updated with really efficient collections of recycler organisms), and food-growing tech for tissue-cultures/ meats (see articles elsewhere on this website, to start).
One place where this sort of tech could be applied (and popularized): the international space station. Space stations, lunar or martian camps, as well as long-term interplanetary trips could all benefit from 100 per cent recirculating biomass/ water cycles. Not only would they be more secure, they would be far cheaper to operate. In fact, developing the tech necessary to make space habitats truly autonomous and sustainable would automatically develop the tech necessary to render nearly any place on earth similarly autonomous, sustainable, and affordable. Energy flows through, matter recirculates, information (knowledge) grows, evolves and develops.
by LaboriousCretin
Yep aeroponics is great. I took that from the pot growers a while back. It just need’s to be easyer to clean and reuse. Plant grafting, plant mutations, and plant DNA modifications ( I.E. G.M.O.’s ) are just one factor for food in the near future. Just like vat grown organisms. But just like G.M.O.’s, solar power, wind power, recycling technology, Solar furnaces, Geothermal energy, Bio-wast reduction and energy production, and outhe rself sustaining technology, even personalized fabrication technology. You will have a hard time seling it to people, and some people will take advantage of the labbling to misslead others from the realy good stuff. Dwarf plants and high yeild plant’s are great though. Basil grows great with this tech, but some other types of plants need grafting or gene modifications for this to work best. SMT LED’s, high presure sodium lamps, low presure sodium lamps, florecents, OLED lighting, Argon or neon lighting, cathode tube lighting, are other factors for the growth in small areas too. Good old technology though. Also easy to do, and cheap too.
by tyranny
Sounds great. But the way legislation and regulation has been going I bet Big Farma will have something to say about people growing their own food. See recent legislation regarding the Codex Alimentarius: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp