The New England Journal of Medicine
HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   HELP   |    More Options
Please sign in for full text and personal services
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 352:2389-2397  June 9, 2005  Number 23
NextNext

A Randomized Trial of Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Calcific Aortic Stenosis
S. Joanna Cowell, B.M., David E. Newby, M.D., Robin J. Prescott, Ph.D., Peter Bloomfield, M.D., John Reid, M.B., Ch.B., David B. Northridge, M.D., Nicholas A. Boon, M.D., for the Scottish Aortic Stenosis and Lipid Lowering Trial, Impact on Regression (SALTIRE) Investigators

 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Rosenhek, R.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Find Similar Articles
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Calcific aortic stenosis has many characteristics in common with atherosclerosis, including hypercholesterolemia. We hypothesized that intensive lipid-lowering therapy would halt the progression of calcific aortic stenosis or induce its regression.

Methods In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with calcific aortic stenosis were randomly assigned to receive either 80 mg of atorvastatin daily or a matched placebo. Aortic-valve stenosis and calcification were assessed with the use of Doppler echocardiography and helical computed tomography, respectively. The primary end points were change in aortic-jet velocity and aortic-valve calcium score.

Results Seventy-seven patients were assigned to atorvastatin and 78 to placebo, with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 7 to 36). Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations remained at 130±30 mg per deciliter in the placebo group and fell to 63±23 mg per deciliter in the atorvastatin group (P<0.001). Increases in aortic-jet velocity were 0.199±0.210 m per second per year in the atorvastatin group and 0.203±0.208 m per second per year in the placebo group (P=0.95; adjusted mean difference, 0.002; 95 percent confidence interval, –0.066 to 0.070 m per second per year). Progression in valvular calcification was 22.3±21.0 percent per year in the atorvastatin group, and 21.7±19.8 percent per year in the placebo group (P=0.93; ratio of post-treatment aortic-valve calcium score, 0.998; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.947 to 1.050).

Conclusions Intensive lipid-lowering therapy does not halt the progression of calcific aortic stenosis or induce its regression. This study cannot exclude a small reduction in the rate of disease progression or a significant reduction in major clinical end points. Long-term, large-scale, randomized, controlled trials are needed to establish the role of statin therapy in patients with calcific aortic stenosis.


Source Information

From the Department of Cardiology, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh (S.J.C., D.E.N., P.B., N.A.B.); Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh (R.J.P.); the Department of Radiology, Borders General Hospital, Melrose, Roxburghshire, United Kingdom (J.R.); and the Department of Cardiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh (D.B.N.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Newby at the Department of Cardiology, Royal Infirmary, Old Dalkeith Rd., Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, United Kingdom, or at d.e.newby{at}ed.ac.uk.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Calcific Aortic Stenosis
Chan K. L., Teo K., Newby D. E., Northridge D. B., Boon N. A.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1066-1067, Sep 8, 2005. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   SEARCH   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   HELP

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.