Subscribe to New Scientist magazine

Special Report Climate Change

Climate myths: Mars and Pluto are warming too

  • 17:00 16 May 2007
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Michael Le Page
Tools
digg thisAdd My YahooAdd Google Reader reddit submitNewsvineciteulike submit
Advertisement

See all 26 climate myths in our special feature.

There have been claims that warming on Mars and Pluto are proof that the recent warming on Earth is caused by an increase in solar activity, and not by greenhouses gases. But we can say with certainty that, even if Mars, Pluto or any other planets have warmed in recent years, it is not due to changes in solar activity.

The Sun's energy output has not increased since direct measurements began in 1978 (see Climate myth special: Global warming is down to the Sun, not humans). If increased solar output really was responsible, we should be seeing warming on all the planets and their moons, not just Mars and Pluto.

Our solar system has eight planets, three dwarf planets and quite a few moons with at least a rudimentary atmosphere, and thus a climate of sorts. Their climates will be affected by local factors such as orbital variations, changes in reflectance (albedo) and even volcanic eruptions, so it would not be surprising if several planets and moons turn out to be warming at any one time.

However, given that a year on Mars is nearly two Earth years long, and that a year on Pluto lasts for 248 Earth years, it is rather early to start drawing conclusions about long-term climate trends on the outer bodies of the Solar System.

What do we know? Images of Mars suggest that between 1999 and 2005, some of the frozen carbon dioxide that covers the south polar region turned into gas (sublimated). This may be the result of the whole planet warming (see Mars images hint at recent climate swings).

Dwarf planet

One theory is that winds have recently swept some areas of Mars clean of dust, darkening the surface, warming the Red Planet and leading to further increases in windiness – a positive feedback effect (see Dust blamed for warming on Mars).

There is a great deal of uncertainty, though. The warming could be a regional effect. And recent results from the thermal imaging system on the Mars Odyssey probe suggest that the polar cap is not shrinking at all, but varies greatly from one Martian year to the next, although the details have yet to be published.

Observations of the thickness of Pluto's atmosphere in 2002 suggested the dwarf planet was warming even as its orbit took it further from the Sun. The finding baffled astronomers at the time, and the cause has yet to be determined.

It has since been suggested that this is due to a greenhouse effect: as it gets closer to the sun Pluto may warm enough for some of the methane ice on its surface to turn into a gas. This would cause further warming, which would continue for a while even after Pluto's orbit starts to take it away from the Sun.

If you would like to comment on this article, visit our blog.

Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 4 comments on 1 page

Re: Load Of Garbage

By Thomas

Tue Jan 08 12:20:11 GMT 2008

"It's not a myth. Why are you deliberately misleading people?"

The article shows there is no evidence the events on Pluto and Mars support hypotheses on the Earth's warming. If there's no evidence it's a myth - an unsubstantiated belief.

REPORT | REPLY

By Stacey

Mon Dec 24 16:12:45 GMT 2007

Some ice has melted on mars, and we know that no people live on mars ,and the earth has warmed in the past too when there were fewer people, therefore it is conclusive that planet warming can happen without people. But even if humans expell co2 which in some role can cause a planet to warm beyond the natural effects we know occour without human presence, who is pompus enough to say a warmer planet is bad for the human race? Who is pompus enough to say that human existance is bad for a planet just becuase humans themself expell co2 from their own breaths, vinyards grow in warmer climits, do they not? Finally who or what body is so powerfull they assume they can take action to controll the feedback mechinisim of a planets natural warming and cooling,cycles, when natural itself includes human acitivity as a natural procsss in the evolution of a planet and taxes can be proven to only effect the suffering of the hard working?

REPORT | REPLY

Load Of Garbage

By Charley

Sun Dec 30 14:46:02 GMT 2007

So, Mars and Pluto ARE warming.

It's not a myth. Why are you deliberately misleading people?

REPORT | REPLY

Load Of Garbage

By Kongol

Tue Mar 25 12:25:43 GMT 2008

Exactly. Lets talk about the biggest sun flares in 2012! Seriously i don't under stand why people believe Al Gore that rat

REPORT | REPLY

There are 4 comments on 1 page

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
Foliage Silhouette
Subscribe | Contact Us | FAQ / Help | Advertise | Disclaimer | Terms and Conditions | Cookies | Privacy Policy | Open Source | Site Map
About NewScientist.com | About New Scientist magazine | Publisher Blog
© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.