This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
1
Europa Lander Mission
Robert Dean Abelson, Ph.D,
James H. Shirley, Ph.D.
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Robert Dean Abelson, Ph.D,
James H. Shirley, Ph.D.
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Small RPS-Enabled Europa Lander Mission
Space Technologies and Applications International Forum
(STAIF 2005)
13 February 2005
Albuquerque, NM
Small RPS-Enabled Europa Lander Mission
Space Technologies and Applications International Forum
(STAIF 2005)
13 February 2005
Albuquerque, NM
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
2
Europa Lander Mission
This is a conceptual mission study intended to demonstrate the
range of possible missions and applications that could be enabled
were a new generation of Small Radioisotope Power Systems to be
developed by NASA and DOE. While such systems are currently
being considered by NASA and DOE, they do not currently exist.
This study is one of several small RPS-enabled mission concepts
that were studied and presented in the NASA/JPL document
“Enabling Exploration with Small Radioisotope Power Systems”
available at:
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/download-detail.cfm?DL_ID=82
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
3
Europa Lander Mission
ELM Team Members and Acknowledgements
Science
•
Ellis Miner
•
Jim Shirley
•
Tom Spilker
RPS Systems
•
Bob Carpenter
•
Bill Nesmith
Mission Design
•
Erik Nilsen
Batteries
•
Rao Surampudi
Radiation Environment
•
Insoo Jun
JIMO Information
•
John Elliott
Europa Pathfinder (EPF) Team
•
Jacklyn R. Green
•
Wayne Zimmerman
•
Eric Archer
•
Alok Chatterjee
•
Savio Chau
•
Mona Delitsky
•
Wai Chi Fang
•
Jeff Hall
•
Ron Hall
•
Don Hunter
•
Lonne Lane
•
Bill Nesmith
•
Jagdish Patel/Elizabeth Kolawa
•
Adam Steltzner
•
Brian Sullivan
•
Leslie Tamppari
•
Ben Thoma
•
Marcus Traylor
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
4
Europa Lander Mission
Why Europa?
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
5
Europa Lander Mission
Europa is the single
highest-priority target
for future flagship-class
missions to the
outer solar system.
Solar System Exploration
Decadal Survey
(National Research Council)
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
6
Europa Lander Mission
Why Land on
Europa?
Because
life
may
exist within Europa’s
icy crust or in a
subsurface ocean.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
7
Europa Lander Mission
Requirements for sustaining life as we know it:
1)
An energy source
: Geothermal, geochemical, and gravitational
heating caused by other Jovian moons
2)
Biologically significant
chemicals
:
(E.g., C, H, O, N, P, K,..)
3)
Water
Europa satisfies these requirements
Europa satisfies these requirements
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
8
Europa Lander Mission
Potential Scientific Objectives for ELM
– To search for signatures of
biological activity
.
– To assess the
chemical and physical habitability
.
– To measure Europa's seismicity ("icequakes") to help
understand the interior structure and crustal dynamics
.
– To provide
"ground truth"
for remote measurements of surface
composition, radiation levels, and temperatures.
– To obtain
close-up images
of Europa surface features and
geology.
Source: From discussions at the JIMO Forum, Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2003
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
9
Europa Lander Mission
Proposed Mission Objectives for ELM
– To land on Europa to
take in-situ measurements
for a
minimum of
30 Earth days
(8.5 Europa days) that
meet the
science objectives
.
– Measurements include
surface imagery, spectroscopy,
seismometry, radiation
and
temperature trending
.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
10
Europa Lander Mission
Europa Orbital and Physical Parameters
– Orbital Period about Jupiter: 3.55 Earth days
(85.2 Earth hours)
– Eclipse Period: 1.78 Earth days
(42.6 Earth hours)
– Semi Major Axis: 671,000 km
– Orbital Eccentricity: 0.0101
– Orbital Velocity: 13.74 km/sec
– Orbital Inclination: 0.464 deg. To Jupiter’s equator
– Diameter (Mean): 3,121 km
– Mass: 4.8E22 kg (0.8035% of Earth mass)
– Gravitational Acceleration at Surface: 1.315 m/s
2
(13.4% of Earth)
– Escape Velocity: 2.026 km/s (at surface)
– Sun Insolation at Surface relative to Earth: 3.7%
– Daytime Temperature of Surface: 124K
– Nighttime Temperature of Surface: 85K
– Average Temperature of Surface (Avg over one day): 103K
– Radiation Environment on Surface: ~14 kRad per Earth Day
•
Assumes 100 mils of aluminum shielding
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
11
Europa Lander Mission
Mission Architecture Overview
– The Europa Lander Mission (ELM) is derived from the Europa Pathfinder
(EPF) study and
takes advantage of RPS technology
to enable a 30 day
surface mission (EPF baseline was battery-limited at 3.5 days).
– ELM is assumed to ride as payload on the proposed
Jupiter Icy Moons
Orbiter (JIMO)
and arrive at Europa per the nominal JIMO timeline.
– JIMO acts as the
communication
relay
between ELM and Earth.
– The ELM landing site would be
selected to
maximize science
returns
and
minimize landing risk
.
– The
landing site could be
updated in-flight
if JIMO identified
higher-priority landing areas
during Europa approach.
Conceptual Only
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
12
Europa Lander Mission
ELM Mounting to Mother Spacecraft
Europa Lander
(ELM)
Europa Lander
(ELM)
Mother Spacecraft
Mother Spacecraft
ELM to Mother S/C
Communication
System
ELM to Mother S/C
Communication
System
ELM to Mother S/C
Mounting Adapter
ELM to Mother S/C
Mounting Adapter
Mother S/C to Earth
Communication
System
Mother S/C to Earth
Communication
System
Conceptual Only
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
13
Europa Lander Mission
Mission Architecture Overview (Continued)
– The baseline JIMO science orbit around Europa is assumed to be
100 km (circular) at 45 degrees inclination for 30 days.
– Once in orbit, ELM would separate from the JIMO bus and spin-stabilize
in preparation for two separate entry burns.
The burns are used to
perform a “stop and drop” maneuver
.
– The first entry burn (22 m/s) changes the lander orbit from 100km
elevation to
100 km x 1.5 km (elliptical)
using a Star 5 engine.
– The second entry burn (1458 m/s) is performed at periapse (1.5km
elevation) using a Star 17 engine.
This stops all forward motion,
causing the lander to “fall” into Europa
.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
14
Europa Lander Mission
Burn#2: 1458 m/s Delta-V
Burn#1: 22 m/s Delta-V
Spin vector
After release from JIMO,
solid motors spin up the
Lander/EDL system.
Impact velocity: 63 m/s
Drop Time: 48 sec
Orbit altitude at periapse
burn ~1.5 km
Orbit altitude at
apoapse burn ~100 km
Conceptual Only
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
15
Europa Lander Mission
Mission Architecture Overview (Continued)
– Aeroshells and parachutes are ineffective
on Europa due to its
negligible atmosphere. Must use other methods for landing.
– A low periapse orbit (1.5km) is selected to reduce the impact velocity to
63 m/s
while maintaining enough elevation margin to handle insertion-
errors (i.e., Isp, rocket burn times, angle errors, etc.)
– Airbags
are used to reduce impact accelerations to
<600g
.
– After landing, the
pressurized air bags are separated and bounce away
from the lander
. This allows the lander to drop to the surface and
make
direct contact with Europa
.
– The surface mission starts following lander contact with the surface.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
16
Europa Lander Mission
Conceptual Only
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
17
Europa Lander Mission
ELM External Configuration
Omni Antenna
Instrument port
Radiator Panels
Ortho View
Top View
Side View
Conceptual Only
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
18
Europa Lander Mission
Technology Applicability Trade Studies
– A trade study was conducted for
three different power systems
for ELM
(2 conventional and 1 RPS).
The conclusions are summarized below.
Option 1: Solar Power
Option 2: Primary Batteries
Option 3: RPS
Not F
easib
le
Not F
easib
le
Enab
ling
Enab
ling
Not F
easib
le
Not F
easib
le
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
19
Europa Lander Mission
Option #1 – Solar Power
Trade Study
Facts:
– Europa is ~5 AU distant from the sun;
receives 3.7% of the Earth insolation
.
– At high latitudes (~45 degrees), the solar flux received by a lander with fixed solar
arrays
peaks at 34 W/m2
. (Does not consider blockage of sun by Jupiter)
– Europa’s rotational period has
42.6 hours (1.775 days) of shadow per Europa Day
.
– Natural radiation over JIMO’s
13 year mission
significantly
degrades solar cells
.
– Lander needs to
operate right-
side up or upside-down
.
– Europa is cold
–nighttime
surface temp ~ 85K.
– Significant thermal power is
required to
maintain operating
temperatures
.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
20
Europa Lander Mission
Option #1 - Solar Power Trade Study (Cont’d)
Results:
– Required
Solar Array (SA) size is drastically larger
(order of
magnitude) than the size of the entire lander.
• Would need extensible/deployable arrays that add additional
mass and complexity.
–
Mass of SA and battery is significantly heavier
than an
equivalent RPS system (is heavier than entire lander).
– Need
additional power source
to operate lander and keep it
warm
during 13 year cruise phase
.
Size
an
d M
ass
Pro
hib
itive
Size
an
d M
ass
Pro
hib
itive
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
21
Europa Lander Mission
Option #2 - Batteries Trade Study
Results:
–
Heater power
required to keep the
large batteries at
operating temperature
(>-40C) in the
frigid Europan
environment
(as low as -188C)
is prohibitive.
–
Mass and volume of battery is significantly larger
than an
equivalent RPS system.
–
Need additional power source
to operate lander and keep it
warm
during 13 year cruise phase
(i.e., for health, status
and comm. checks).
Ma
ss
Pro
hibi
tive
Ma
ss
Pro
hibi
tive
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
22
Europa Lander Mission
Option #3 - RPS Analysis (Continued)
Results:
–
RPS has the lightest mass
of all three options.
–
RPS is drastically smaller than the solar+battery option
, and
measurably smaller than the battery-only option.
–
The RPS option produces extra heat that can be used to keep
electronics, batteries and critical systems warm
during the entire 13
year cruise and 30 day surface missions.
–
The RPS is a self-contained system
, requiring no external recharging
or alternate power connectivity with the JIMO spacecraft during cruise.
RPS is an Enabling Power Technology for the
ELM Mission
RPS is an Enabling Power Technology for the
ELM Mission
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
23
Europa Lander Mission
RPS Characteristics and Assumptions
–
One GPHS module
using a
5% efficient thermoelectric (TE) converter
is
assumed to provide 250 Wt (thermal) /12.5 We (electric) at BOM.
•
Conversion efficiency numbers are conservative. May be able to achieve >7.5% efficiency with
segmented PbTe-TAGS/BiTe thermoelectrics (more with CPA designs) per DOE/OSC analyses.
•
Small RPS configuration based on work of DOE/OSC/Analytix
– Assume
Pu283 decay
decreases thermal power output by
0.8%/year
.
– Assume
TE decay
decreases electrical power by another
0.8%/year
.
– The
End-of-Mission
power output after
13 years
is
calculated at
225 Wt / 10.1 We
.
– Medium temperature TEs (e.g., PbTe/TAGS) are
assumed in baseline design for conservatism.
•
Cold shoe temp. ~155
o
C
.
– The RPS is assumed capable of surviving high
acceleration loads
(max of 600 g)
associated with
the ELM landing system.
– The RPS is packaging is a
short cylinder
with the
TEs arranged radially
(i.e., TE cold shoes / heat
rejection is via the sides).
Conceptual Only
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
24
Europa Lander Mission
RPS Installation and Orientation within ELM
GPHS Module (Grey)
GPHS Module (Grey)
Thermoelectric
Converters (Red)
Thermoelectric
Converters (Red)
Thermal Insulation /
RPS Canister (Green)
Thermal Insulation /
RPS Canister (Green)
Conceptual Only
Note: Radiator panels, antennas and internal subsystems (other than RPS) not shown.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
25
Europa Lander Mission
Mission Design and Constraints*
– Mission Dates
•
Earliest Availability:
Assumed 2015 via JIMO
; Earlier using Delta/Atlas (requires Europa Orbiter).
– Delivery Vehicle
•
Planned delivery vehicle: JIMO Spacecraft (
1500 kg total science payload capability)
– Lifetime
•
Transit duration:
TBD – Assumed 13 years total
for power system sizing.
–
9 years to Jupiter system, 4 more years to Europa
•
Active measurement duration:
30 days on Europa surface
•
Total: ~
13 years
(Assumed for power system sizing)
– Delta-V Requirements (Independent of Delivery Vehicle)
•
Delta-V:
1480 m/s
for ELM Stop and Drop maneuver.
– Constraints
•
JIMO would stay in orbit around Europa for 30 days and
provide the communications link between the
Lander and Earth.
•
Orbital Parameters:
JIMO is in a circular 100 km altitude orbit
during the 30 day lander mission.
•
Operational Constraints:
JIMO would need to be oriented
such that the JIMO-to-Lander comm. system
can
point towards the lander
during each comm. period to receive the omni-directional signal.
* JIMO information has not been finalized by the JIMO program office – Indicated values are study assumptions only.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
26
Europa Lander Mission
ELM Communications Architecture
Conceptual Only
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
27
Europa Lander Mission
ELM Communication Architecture
– The
frequency and duration
of communication periods from ELM to
JIMO
drives the communications architecture
.
– The
frequency and duration
of communication events is
highly
dependent upon the latitude
of the ELM landing site.
0
o
Lander latitude
~
17 Comm. Cycles (Total mission)
5 Comm. Periods / Cycle (83 total)
710 min. of Comm. (Total)
~43 min. of Comm. / Cycle (Avg)
43 hours of eclipse / Cycle
0
o
Lander latitude
~
17 Comm. Cycles (Total mission)
5 Comm. Periods / Cycle (83 total)
710 min. of Comm. (Total)
~43 min. of Comm. / Cycle (Avg)
43 hours of eclipse / Cycle
45
o
Lander latitude
~
8 Cycles (Total mission)
14 Comm. periods / Cycle (111 Total)
1050 min. of Comm. (Total)
130 min. of Comm / Cycle (Avg)
84 hours of Eclipse / Cycle
45
o
Lander latitude
~
8 Cycles (Total mission)
14 Comm. periods / Cycle (111 Total)
1050 min. of Comm. (Total)
130 min. of Comm / Cycle (Avg)
84 hours of Eclipse / Cycle
– The ELM bandwidth requirement is driven by the short communication
duration (42.7 min/cycle) of the 0
o
latitude case.
– The ELM data storage requirement is driven by the long eclipse period
(84 hours/cycle) of the 45
o
latitude case.
– The ELM
bandwidth requirement
is driven by the short communication
duration (42.7 min/cycle) of the
0
o
latitude case
.
– The ELM
data storage requirement
is driven by the long eclipse period
(84 hours/cycle) of the
45
o
latitude case
.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
28
Europa Lander Mission
LOS Periods at 45 deg Latitude
(14 Comm. Periods per Cycle)
LOS Periods at 0 deg Latitude
(5 Comm. Periods per Cycle)
5 degree Minimum LOS for Communications Event
Europa Day #1
Europa Day #2
Elevation Line-of-Site (LOS) Angle from Lander to JIMO Over
Two Europa Days (~7 Earth days)
LOS Angle (Degrees)
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
29
Europa Lander Mission
Baseline Instrumentation Suite
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
30
Europa Lander Mission
Instruments
Data Rate
(kbits / msmt)
# of
Instruments
#Measuremts
per Europa
Day
Measuremt
Frequency
(# / Earth Hr)
Accumulated Data
Volume per Europa
Day (kbits)
Accumulated
Data Volume per
Europa Day
(Mbits)
Imager
2600
16
85
1
219762
220
Microseismometer
1
3
304286
3600
912858
913
Raman Spectrometer
10
1
85
1
845
0.85
LIBS
10
1
42
1
423
0.42
Temperature Sensors
0.016
16
169
2
43
0.04
Radiation Sensors
0.016
4
304286
3600
19474
19
Engineering Data
0.100
1
5071
60
507
0.51
1154
3407
0.47
1.40
195%
1154
1385
Margin in Uplink Capability (Also Have 3dB margin)
Data Storage Reqt Based on Longest Eclipse (Mbits)
Total Accumulated Data Volume / Euro Day (Mbits)
Uplink Capability / Euro Day (Mbits)
Req'd Uplink Rate (Mbit/s)
Available Uplink Rate (Mbit/s)
Design Data Storage w/ 20% Margin (Mbits)
Data Requirements
•
Data uplink requirement is 1.4 Mbit/s – Draws 6 We Peak Power.
– Comm. design has uplink margin of ~200%
•
Data storage requirement is 1.4 Gb – Draws 3 We Peak Power.
•
Data uplink requirement is 1.4 Mbit/s –
Draws 6 We Peak Power.
– Comm. design has uplink margin of ~200%
•
Data storage requirement is 1.4 Gb –
Draws 3 We Peak Power.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
31
Europa Lander Mission
Data Taking Schedule
Measurements Stop During All Comm. Events
Measurements Stop During All Comm. Events
Imager (8 ports)
(1 meas./hour)
Microseismometer
(Continuous)
Raman (8 ports)
(1 meas./hour)
LIBS (8 ports)
(1 meas./hour – days)
Temp. sensors
(1 meas./30 min)
Radiation sensors
(Continuous)
Engineering Data
(1 meas./min)
Day (~42.6 hrs)
Night (~42.6 hrs)
Day (~42.6 hrs)
Daytime #1
Nighttime #1
Daytime #2
Time
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
32
Europa Lander Mission
ELM Duty Cycles and Subsystem Power Levels
Qty
Power Draw
(W / unit)
Power Draw All
Units (W)
Duty Cycle
Avg Power Draw per
Europa Day (W)
Operating Time
per Europa Day
(Hrs)
Command Data and Handeling
System Flight Computer
1
2.60
2.60
0.30
0.78
85.20
Peripheral Subsystem Intf (PSI)
1
1.00
1.00
0.30
0.30
85.20
Power Distribution
DC/DC Converter Card
1
3.00
3.00
0.30
0.90
85.20
Power Distribution Slice
1
2.20
2.20
0.30
0.66
85.20
Science Instruments
Imager
1
0.20
0.20
1.00
0.20
0.23
Microseismometer
3
0.14
0.42
1.00
0.42
84.52
Raman Spectrometer
1
5.00
5.00
1.00
5.00
2.82
LIBS
1
5.00
5.00
1.00
5.00
2.82
Temperature Sensors
16
0.10
1.60
1.00
1.60
0.47
Radiation Sensors
4
0.10
0.40
1.00
0.40
84.52
Comm. Subsystem (JIMO Link)
Transceiver (2W RF Output, 33%
Efficient)
1
6.00
6.00
1.00
6.00
0.68
Data Storage
Data Storage (SSR)
1
3.00
3.00
0.30
0.90
85.20
System
ELM Operating Modes and Durations are selected to Maximize
Science Return while Meeting the Power Budget.
ELM Operating Modes and Durations are selected to Maximize
Science Return while Meeting the Power Budget.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
33
Europa Lander Mission
Battery Requirements
ELM Operating Modes and Power Requirements
Maximum Power Draw: 17.8 W
Avg Power Draw: 4.5 W
RPS Power Output (EOM): 10.1 W
Req’d Battery Size: 63.1 W-Hr
Req’d Battery Mass: 0.53 kg
Maximum Power Draw:
17.8 W
Avg Power Draw:
4.5 W
RPS Power Output (EOM): 10.1 W
Req’d Battery Size:
63.1 W-Hr
Req’d Battery Mass: 0.53 kg
Additional Peak NRG Req'd (W-Hr)
12.49
Battery Depth of Discharge (%)
33%
Battery Charging Efficiency (%)
90%
Battery Energy Density (W-Hr/kg)
120
Battery Energy Volume (W-Hr/liter)
200
Min. Reqd Batt. (W-Hr)
42.05
Batt w/ 50% Margin (W-Hr)
63.08
Batt Mass (kg)
0.526
Batt Volume (Liters)
0.315
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
34
Europa Lander Mission
Power Levels for Each Operating Mode
0
5
10
15
20
Standby Mode
Basic Measmt Mode
Raman Mode
LIBS Mode
Comm. Mode
Operating Mode
Power Draw (W)
Average
Peak
0
5
10
15
20
Standby Mode
Basic Measmt Mode
Raman Mode
LIBS Mode
Comm. Mode
Operating Mode
Power Draw (W)
Average
Peak
GPHS Power Output 10.14W (EOM)
GPHS Power Output 10.14W (EOM)
17.8 W
17.3 W
17.3 W
12.3 W
11.8 W
B
a
tt
e
ry
C
o
v
e
rs
P
e
a
k
L
o
a
d
s
B
a
tt
e
ry
C
o
v
e
rs
P
e
a
k
L
o
a
d
s
7.5 W
9.1 W
9.1 W
4.1 W
1.5 W
Average Power Usage 4.5 W (EOM)
Average Power Usage 4.5 W (EOM)
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
35
Europa Lander Mission
ELM Mass Requirements
Lander Mass: 38.7kg
Total S/C Mass: 232.7kg
Lander Mass: 38.7kg
Total S/C Mass: 232.7kg
Item
Qty
CBE (kg)
Uncertainty
(kg)
Total CBE
(kg)
Lander Payload
38.7
Command Data and handling
1.84
System Flight Computer
1
0.50
0.08
0.58
Peripheral Subsystem Intf (PSI)
1
0.10
0.02
0.12
Bus
1
1.00
0.15
1.15
Power Distribution
1.64
Power Distribution Slice
1
0.49
0.05
0.54
DC/DC Converter Card
1
1.00
0.10
1.10
Power
11.16
GPHS RPS
1
5.00
5.00
10.00
Batteries
1
0.33
0.17
0.50
Packaging
1
0.63
0.03
0.66
Pyro and Valve Control
0.87
Battery Charge Control
1
0.30
0.03
0.33
Prop Drive
1
0.49
0.05
0.54
Science Instruments
9.30
Seismometer
3
0.05
0.01
0.18
Imagers
16
0.20
0.04
3.84
Raman Spectrometer
1
2.00
0.40
2.40
LIBS
1
2.00
0.40
2.40
Radiation Sensor
4
0.10
0.02
0.48
Temp sensors
16
0.01
0.00
0.17
Telecom - S-Band Subsystem
3.30
Transceiver
1
0.30
0.03
0.33
S-Band Antenna
6
0.25
0.03
1.65
Packaging
1
0.30
0.03
0.33
Coax Cables to antennas
6
0.15
0.02
0.99
G & C Sensors
0.21
Accelerometers
3
0.05
0.00
0.16
3 axis gyro
1
0.05
0.00
0.05
Thermal
1.26
Heater Elements
10
0.02
0.00
0.21
Insulation
1
1.00
0.05
1.05
Mechanical Systems
10.00
Structure
1
3.60
0.36
3.96
Covers
6
0.10
0.01
0.66
Misc (fasteners)
1
0.72
0.03
0.75
Cabling
1
0.60
0.03
0.63
Radiation Shielding
1
2.00
2.00
4.00
Net Lander
38.7
Item
Qty
CBE (kg)
Uncertainty
(kg)
Total CBE
(kg)
Propulsion
111.4
Upper Desent Stage
13.7
Support and Separation Mechanism
3
1.00
0.05
3.15
Support structure
1
2.54
0.25
2.79
ARC Solid KS40B Thrusters (spin-up)
2
0.38
0.02
0.80
ARC Solid PAC-3 Thrusters (spin-down)
2
0.16
0.01
0.34
Hydrazine trim system
1
1.80
0.09
1.89
Star 5 rocket motor
1
4.50
0.23
4.73
Lower Desent Stage
97.7
Support and Separation Mechanism
3
1.00
0.05
3.15
Support Structure
1
5.70
0.57
6.27
Star 17 Motor
1
84.10
4.21
88.31
Thermal
2.2
Thermal Blankets
1
1.00
0.05
1.05
Temp sensors
10
0.01
0.00
0.11
Misc
1
1.00
0.05
1.05
Mechanical Systems
13.9
JIMO Attachment System
1
5.00
3.00
8.00
Ballest
1
5.00
0.50
5.50
Fasteners
1
0.40
0.01
0.41
Landing System
61.0
NSI - Gas Generator
3
1.00
0.05
3.15
Airbags
3
16.06
3.21
57.82
JIMO-Based Comm.system
5.5
Antenna
1
3.00
1.00
4.00
Gimbal
1
1.00
0.50
1.50
Net Spacecraft (EPF)
232.7
38.7
111.4
2.2
13.9
61.0
5.5
232.7
Lander Mass (Total)
Thermal Mass (Total)
Mechanical Systems Mass (Total)
S/C subtotal
Landing System Mass (Total)
JIMO-Based Comm. System
Propulsion Mass (Total)
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
36
Europa Lander Mission
ELM Thermal Requirements
•
Assumptions
– GPHS Thermal Power: 250 We (BOM) /
225 We (EOM @ 13yrs)
– Thermoelectric Cold-Leg Temp.
155
o
C
•
Thermal Control is Accomplished via Multiple Approaches:
–
Conduction straps
and
thermal switches
keep critical electronics, batteries and
subsystems warm.
– Thermal radiation to space is performed through variable-emissivity
radiators
mounted on
both surfaces of the lander
.
• The
emissivity
can be actively varied between
~0.3 and 0.7
to maintain the
desired lander temperature profile (Beasley, Kislov, Biter STAIF 2004).
– Heat rejection to the Europan surface is made via
contact conduction
between
the surface and lander structure. Thermal switches control heat flow.
•
The RPS Waste Heat is Used to Keep Critical
Electronics and Subsystems Warm.
•
Variable emissivity radiators permit active thermal
control using minimal power and no moving parts.
•
The
RPS Waste Heat
is Used to Keep
Critical
Electronics and Subsystems Warm
.
•
Variable emissivity radiators
permit
active thermal
control
using minimal power and no moving parts.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
37
Europa Lander Mission
Radiation Environment
–
Externally Generated Radiation
•
ELM receives an external dose of
~420 kRad during the 30 day surface mission
*.
•
The total received
lifetime (13 year) dose is ~6 MRad
*.
•
Potential
mitigation strategies
include housing ELM in a
JIMO-mounted radiation
shelter
, using
spot shielding
around critical components, and employing
rad-hard
electronics
with >1 MRad tolerance.
–
Shelter and shielding could potentially reduce lifetime ELM external dose to <1 MRad.
•
ELM will capitalize off the JIMO radiation studies and technology
currently being
studied, and will utilize similar or identical mitigation schemes.
–
Internally Generated Radiation
•
Internally-generated radiation is produced by the
GPHS module
.
•
Intensity of
radiation falls of quickly with distance
from the GPHS due to spatial and
structural attenuation through the RPS and ELM structure.
•
GPHS
-generated radiation is
significantly lower
than the
natural radiation
dose (Can
be made <100 kRad with proper design).
•
Judicious placement of electronic and lander structure can keep the
total GPHS-
emitted dose to levels tolerable with existing technology
.
* Calculations extrapolated from those provided by Insoo Jun (JPL) and assume 100 mil aluminum shielding.
Radiation can be mitigated using a JIMO-mounted radiation
shelter, spot shielding, and rad-hard parts.
Radiation can be mitigated using a JIMO-mounted radiation
shelter, spot shielding, and rad-hard parts.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
38
Europa Lander Mission
Radiation Environment (Continued)*
*Radiation Data provided by Insoo Jun (JPL).
Total Radiation Dose vs. Distance from Center of GPHS
Module for 13 year Duration
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Unshielded Distance from GPHS Module Center, (cm)
Total Radiation Dose, (MRad)
Total Z-Axis Radiation for 13
years (MRads)
Total Y-Axis Radiation for 13
years (MRads)
4-pi spherical total dose depth curves
Breakdown by mission segments
1.0E+02
1.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.0E+05
1.0E+06
1.0E+07
1.0E+08
10
100
1000
10000
aluminum spherical shell thickness, mils
rad
(Si)
TOTAL
301 days at Ganymede
120 days from Ganymede to Europa
113.5 days at Europa
Reactor dose
Earth Spiral-out from 1000km
4-pi spherical DDD depth curves based on GIRE model
Breakdown by mission segments
1.0E+05
1.0E+06
1.0E+07
1.0E+08
1.0E+09
1.0E+10
1.0E+11
1.0E+12
1.0E+13
1.0E+14
1.0E+15
10
100
1000
10000
aluminum spherical shell thickness, mils
1 M
e
V
ne
utro
ns
/cm
2
TOTAL
301 days at Ganymede
120 days from Ganymede to Europa
113.5 days at Europa
Reactor neutron
Earth spiral-out from 1000km
GPHS Module
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
39
Europa Lander Mission
Alternate Power System Concepts
– Current ELM design uses one GPHS/TE RPS and a small battery to
meet all power requirements.
•
Battery needed to supply peak power demands
during LIBS, Raman and Communication
events (
max. of 17.8 Watts
).
– Could
eliminate the need for a battery
using alternate power system
architecture, including:
• Use
Two GPHS RPSs
with baseline 5% TE Conversion Efficiency
– Capable of generating 20.2W (EOL) –
meets all power modes
.
– Requires larger, more massive spacecraft –
redesign necessary
.
– Heat rejection
becomes a significant issue.
• Use
Higher-Efficiency
Power Converters
– A
9% efficient
TE converter could generate
>17.8 W (EOM)
using one GPHS
module.
– A small
20% efficient Stirling
engine could generate >17.8 W (EOM) using just
two
GPHS Fuel Pellets
.
»
Stirling needs to be sufficiently vibration-free to prevent interference with
microseismometer measurements.
Not r
ecom
men
ded
Not r
ecom
men
ded
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
40
Europa Lander Mission
Summary and Conclusions
– The Europa Lander Mission (
ELM
) is designed to search for signatures
of
biological activity
and measure the
chemical and physical properties
of Europa.
– ELM would ride
“piggyback”
on the proposed
JIMO S/C
during the ~13
year cruise phase, and would land on Europa to perform its
30 day
science mission
.
– The ELM Mission is
enabled
by the
RPS
power system.
• A single
GPHS/TE RPS
powers ELM and provides
126% energy margin
.
• A small
63 W-Hr Li-Ion battery
is used to carry the
peak loads
.
• The
excess heat
is used to
warm critical electronics, batteries and
subsystems
in the frigid Europan environment.
– Higher-efficiency power converters
could further optimize the system:
• Could
eliminate
the need for the
Li-Ion battery.
• Could
reduce
the req’d amount of
Pu238 fuel
. (Use 2 pellets vs. current 4)
.
This information is pre-decisional and for discussion purposes only.
41
Europa Lander Mission
Additional RPS-Enabled Missions
– The
ELM configuration
can be used for missions on
Callisto and
Ganymede
with
minimal modification
.
• The ELM RPS configuration would be adequate for a
60 day Callisto
surface mission
, and a
120 day Ganymede mission
– Durations are based on a preliminary JIMO mission timeline.
– Additional small RPS-enabled Lander mission could include:
• Small landers for
outer solar system solid bodies
.
– Includes moons, Pluto, asteroids and comets.
•
Lunar human-precursor missions
– RPS enables operation through the
14 day eclipse
, at
poles
and in the
shadows
of
canyons and mountains
.
•
Mars Network
,
Scout Class
and
Human Precursor Landers
– RPS permits
continuous, long term missions
in
polar regions
and other
low-insolation areas
.