BMJ  2007;335:380 (25 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.39227.551713.AE (published 29 June 2007)

Research

Accuracy of diagnosing atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram by primary care practitioners and interpretative diagnostic software: analysis of data from screening for atrial fibrillation in the elderly (SAFE) trial

¹ Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, ² Health Economics Facility, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2RT, ³ Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, ⁴ University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH

Objective To assess the accuracy of general practitioners, practice nurses, and interpretative software in the use of different types of electrocardiogram to diagnose atrial fibrillation.

Design Prospective comparison with reference standard of assessment of electrocardiograms by two independent specialists.

Setting 49 general practices in central England.

Participants 2595 patients aged 65 or over screened for atrial fibrillation as part of the screening for atrial fibrillation in the elderly (SAFE) study; 49 general practitioners and 49 practice nurses.

Interventions All electrocardiograms were read with the Biolog interpretative software, and a random sample of 12 lead, limb lead, and single lead thoracic placement electrocardiograms were assessed by general practitioners and practice nurses independently of each other and of the Biolog assessment.

Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.

Results General practitioners detected 79 out of 99 cases of atrial fibrillation on a 12 lead electrocardiogram (sensitivity 80%, 95% confidence interval 71% to 87%) and misinterpreted 114 out of 1355 cases of sinus rhythm as atrial fibrillation (specificity 92%, 90% to 93%). Practice nurses detected a similar proportion of cases of atrial fibrillation (sensitivity 77%, 67% to 85%), but had a lower specificity (85%, 83% to 87%). The interpretative software was significantly more accurate, with a specificity of 99%, but missed 36 of 215 cases of atrial fibrillation (sensitivity 83%). Combining general practitioners' interpretation with the interpretative software led to a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 91%. Use of limb lead or single lead thoracic placement electrocardiograms resulted in some loss of specificity.

Conclusions Many primary care professionals cannot accurately detect atrial fibrillation on an electrocardiogram, and interpretative software is not sufficiently accurate to circumvent this problem, even when combined with interpretation by a general practitioner. Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in the community needs to factor in the reading of electrocardiograms by appropriately trained people.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Diagnosing atrial fibrillation in general practice

Henk C P M van Weert
BMJ 2007 335: 355-356. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial

David A Fitzmaurice, F D Richard Hobbs, Sue Jowett, Jonathon Mant, Ellen T Murray, Roger Holder, J P Raftery, S Bryan, Michael Davies, Gregory Y H Lip, and T F Allan
BMJ 2007 335: 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Identification of patients with atrial fibrillation in general practice: a study of screening methods

Mark Sudlow, Helen Rodgers, Rose Anne Kenny, and Richard Thomson
BMJ 1998 317: 327-328. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2007). Looking for Atrial Fibrillation. JWatch General 2007: 3-3 [Full text]  
• van Weert, H. C P M (2007). Diagnosing atrial fibrillation in general practice. BMJ 335: 355-356 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Accuracy of Detection of Atrial Fibrillation calls for proper and rigid training of primary care practitioners

Rodolfo Jr. L. Yuchongco
bmj.com, 6 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Recognizing of atrial fibrillation (AF) on ECG in man: almost 100 years, but obviously not enough

Goran Koracevic
bmj.com, 20 Jul 2007 [Full text]

Re: Accuracy of Detection of Atrial Fibrillation calls for proper and rigid training of primary care practitioners

Rajendra Kumar Yadava
bmj.com, 16 Aug 2007 [Full text]

Are ECGs with interpretative software and electronic sphygomomanometers deskilling GPs in detecting Atrial Fibrillation?

Matt Hoghton
bmj.com, 28 Aug 2007 [Full text]

Atrial Fibrillation & Use of Technology

Stephen Ward, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Aug 2007 [Full text]

Thoughts from General Practice

Ralph Emmerson
bmj.com, 5 Sep 2007 [Full text]

Re: Thoughts from General Practice

Jonathan Mant
bmj.com, 11 Sep 2007 [Full text]

Response from both Hospital and GP angles

Ashish B Patel
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2007 [Full text]