HQ-09750.INDD
Administration
Federal Aviation
Commercial Space
Transportation:
2008 Year In Review
January 2009
• i •
2008 Year in Review
About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation
The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial
Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space
launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and
reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States
Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act).
FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of
property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests
of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations.
In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and
promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional
information concerning commercial space transportation can be
found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov.
Cover: Art by John Sloan (2009)
NOTICE
Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not
constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either
expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration.
• ii •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
2008 FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
U.S. and FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Activity in Detail . . . . . . . .5
2008 Worldwide Orbital Launch Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Worldwide Orbital Payload Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Launch Activities by Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
Five-Year Worldwide Space Transportation Trends . . . . . . . . . . . .17
2008 FAA Experimental Permit Flight Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
Appendix : 2008 Worldwide Orbital Launch Events . . . . . . . . . . . .22
• 1 •
2008 Year in Review
InTrODUCTIOn
The
Commercial Space Transportation: 2008 Year in Review
summarizes U.S. and
international launch activities for calendar year 2008 and provides a historical look
at the past five years of commercial launch activity.
The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation
(FAA/AST) licensed eleven commercial orbital launches in 2008, over twice the
four licensed launches in 2007. The year included the first successful launch of a
new U.S. rocket, the Falcon 1 built by SpaceX.
Of the eleven orbital licensed launches, six used U.S.-built vehicles. Two launches
were on the United Launch Alliance (ULA) Delta II operated by Boeing Launch
Services, while one was a ULA Atlas V operated by Lockheed Martin. Two
launches were by the privately-developed SpaceX Falcon 1 rocket. One launch was
carried out by Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Pegasus XL rocket. The other five
launches used the multinational Sea Launch Zenit-3SL.
Overall, 28 commercial orbital launches occurred worldwide in 2008, representing
41 percent of the 69 total launches for the year. This marked an increase over 2007,
which saw 23 commercial orbital launches worldwide.
Russia conducted 11 commercial launch campaigns in 2008, bringing its
international commercial launch market share to 39 percent for the year, a decrease
from 2007. FAA/AST-licensed orbital launch activity accounted for 39 percent
of the worldwide commercial launch market in 2008 while Europe attained an 18
percent market share, conducting five commercial Ariane 5 launches.
Of the 69 worldwide orbital launches, there were three launch failures, including
one non-commercial launch and two commercial launches. The non-commercial
launch failure is attributed to Iran’s August 17 launch attempt of the Safir vehicle.
On the commercial side, a Russian Proton launch and a SpaceX Falcon 1 failed.
Five low-altitude flights under FAA experimental permits took place in 2008.
Four suborbital permitted flights were carried out by Armadillo Aerospace and
one permitted flight was performed by TrueZer0.
The following definitions apply to the
Commercial Space Transportation: 2008 Year
in Review.
Commercial Suborbital or Orbital Launch
A commercial suborbital or orbital launch has one or more of the following
characteristics:
The launch is licensed by FAA/AST.
•
The primary payload’s launch contract was internationally competed (see
•
definition of internationally competed below). A primary payload is generally
• 2 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
defined as the payload with the greatest mass on a launch vehicle for a given
launch.
The launch is privately financed without government support.
•
Internationally Completed
An internationally competed launch contract is one in which the launch
opportunity was available in principle to any capable launch service provider. Such
a launch is considered commercial.
Commercial Payload
A commercial payload is described as having one or both of the following
characteristics:
The payload is operated by a private company.
•
The payload is funded by the government, but provides satellite service
•
partially or totally through a private or semi-private company. This distinction
is usually applied to certain telecommunication satellites whose transponders
are partially or totally leased to a variety of organizations, some or all of which
generate revenues. Examples are Russia’s Express and Ekran series of spacecraft.
All other payloads are classified as non-commercial (government civil,
government military, or non-profit).
Orbits
A spacecraft in geostationary Earth orbit (GSO) is synchronized with the
•
Earth’s rotation, orbiting once every 24 hours, and appears to an observer on
the ground to be stationary in the sky. GEO is a broader category used for any
circular orbit at an altitude of 35,852 kilometers (22,277 miles) with a low
inclination (i.e., over the equator).
Non-geosynchronous orbit (NGSO) satellites are those in orbits other than
•
GEO. They are located in low Earth orbit (LEO, lowest achievable orbit to
about 2,400 kilometers, or 1,491 miles), medium Earth orbit (MEO, 2,400
kilometers to GEO), and all other high or elliptical orbits or trajectories. ELI
is used to describe a highly elliptical orbit (such as those used for Russian
Molniya satellites), and EXT is a designation used for orbits beyond GEO
(such as interplanetary trajectories).
• 3 •
2008 Year in Review
2008 FAA-LICEnSED OrbITAL LAUnCh
SUmmArY
Recent trends in annual FAA-licensed orbital launches show that after a rough
year in 2007, GEO launches took back center stage with 6 of 11 FAA-licensed
commercial launches in 2008. In 2005 and 2006, FAA-licensed launches were
dominated by GEO launches. After a Sea Launch failure in early 2007, there were
no further launches of the Zenit-3SL and the majority of licensed flights were
made by Delta II rockets to LEO, carrying
remote sensing satellites. With the
successful return of the Zenit-3SL rocket
on January 15, 2008, Sea Launch went
on to complete five successful launches.
These eleven launches are summarized in
Table 1.
The two Delta II launches both took place
from a U.S. range: Vandenberg Air Force
Base (VAFB) in California. The launches
both successfully placed their respective
remote sensing payloads into LEO.
Five Zenit-3SL launches from the Sea
Launch Odyssey platform occurred during
2008. All five launches successfully placed
their communications satellite payloads
into GEO.
The 11 FAA-licensed launches included the
following characteristics:
Eight of the launches were conducted
•
for commercial clients (DISH
Network, DirecTV, Intelsat, SES New
Skies, ICO, Thuraya, and Geoeye
Inc.), while two were launches of the
privately-developed Falcon 1 (one
with a U.S. government customer) and
a Delta II launch was for the Italian
government.
The eleven launches were worth an
•
estimated US$640 million.
1
1
Revenues for both U.S. and foreign commercial launches are based on open source information
and estimates by FAA/AST. They are only approximations. Actual revenue received for a single launch may
be spread over several years.
Table 1. 2008 FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Events
Date
Vehicle
Payload
Orbit
Launch
Outcome
15-Jan-08
Zenit-3SL
Thuraya 3
GEO
Success
19-Mar-08
Zenit-3SL
DirecTV 11
GEO
Success
14-Apr-08
Atlas V 421
ICO G1
GEO
Success
16-Apr-08
Pegasus XL
C/NOFS
LEO
Success
21-May-08
Zenit-3SL
Galaxy 18
GEO
Success
15-Jul-08
Zenit-3SL
Echostar XI
GEO
Success
03-Aug-08
Falcon 1
Jumpstart, et al.
LEO
Failure
06-Sep-08
Delta II 7420-10
GeoEye 1
LEO
Success
24-Sep-08
Zenit-3SL
Galaxy 19
GEO
Success
28-Sep-08
Falcon 1
Flight 4
LEO
Success
24-Oct-08
Delta II 7420-10 COSMO-SkyMed 3
LEO
Success
Figure 1. FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Events, 2004-2008
9
5
7
4
11
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Number of O
rbital Launches
ss
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
• 4 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
The number of FAA-licensed orbital launches in 2008 was the highest since 1999.
Since 2004, launch rates have fluctuated (see Figure 1) but the resurgence of the Sea
Launch system saw revenues climb. A trend similar to that for annual launches is
evident for estimated FAA-licensed commercial orbital launch revenues from 2004
to 2008 (see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Estimated Revenues for FAA-Licensed
Orbital Launch Events, 2004-2008
$585
$350
$490
$220
$640
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$US Millions
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
• 5 •
2008 Year in Review
U.S. AnD FAA-LICEnSED OrbITAL LAUnCh
ACTIvITY In DETAIL
U.S. vehicles carried out a total of 15 launches in 2008, six of which were licensed
by FAA/AST. Of the nine non-commercial U.S. launches, four were Space Shuttle
missions, two carried U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) payloads or were
sponsored by the DoD, and the remaining three were National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA) civil government missions.
Sea Launch conducted five FAA-licensed commercial launches.
See Table 2 for a detailed breakdown of U.S. launch activity (including Sea
Launch) during 2008 by vehicle.
Table 2. U.S. and FAA-Licensed Launch Vehicle Performance in 2008
UNITED STATES
SEA LAUNCH
Vehicle
Pegasus XL
Falcon 1
Delta II
Atlas V
Shuttle
Zenit-3SL
2008 Total Launches
2
2
5
2
4
5
2008 Licensed
Launches
1
2
2
1
0
5
Launch Reliability
(2008)
2/2
100%
1/2
50%
5/5
100%
2/2
100%
4/4
100%
5/5
100%
Launch Reliability
(Last 10 Years)
13/13
100%
1/4
25%
62/62
100%
14/14
100%
31/31
100%
28/30
93%
Year of First Launch
1994
2006
1990
2002
1981
1999
Active Launch Sites
CCAFS,
Kwajalein,
VAFB, WFF
Kwajalein
CCAFS,
VAFB
CCAFS,
VAFB
KSC
Odyssey Pacific
Ocean Platform
LEO kg (lbs)
443
(977)
454
(1,000)
6,100
(13,440)
20,520
(45,240)
23,435
(51,557)
15,246
(33,541)
GTO kg (lbs)
--
--
2,170
(4,790)
8,670
(19,110)
5,663
(12,459)
6,100
(13,440)
CCAFS - Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, KSC - Kennedy Space Center, VAFB - Vandenberg Air Force
Base, WFF - Wallops Flight Facility
Note: Launch reliability is determined by analyzing the number of successful and failed launches of a partic-
ular vehicle; mission outcome (success or failure) is not used in the calculation of launch vehicle reliability.
• 6 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
bOEInG LAUnCh SErvICES (bLS)
BLS is the provider of Delta series rockets for commercial customers. BLS
conducted two commercial launches in 2008, both using the Delta II vehicle. In
September, a Delta II 7420-10 was used to launch the GeoEye-1 earth observation
satellite, while the third COSMO-SkyMed satellite was launched by a Delta II in
October. The COSMO-SkyMed satellites are the Italian government’s new series of
remote sensing spacecraft. All U.S. government Delta vehicle launches were carried
out by the United Launch Alliance (ULA), detailed below.
LOCKhEED mArTIn COmmErCIAL LAUnCh SErvICES
Lockheed Martin Commercial Launch Services (LMCLS) manages all commercial
launches of the Atlas V rocket. In 2008, LMCLS performed one launch. The
launch took place in April and was commercially licensed, placing the ICO G1
communications satellite into GEO. ICO G1 is owned and operated by ICO
Global Communications and provides mobile satellite services.
OrbITAL SCIEnCES COrPOrATIOn (OSC)
OSC provides the Minotaur, Pegasus, and Taurus vehicles for orbital launch.
OSC performed two successful launches in 2008, one of which was commercially
licensed and the other non-commercial. The April 16 launch of the commercially-
licensed Pegasus XL placed the Communications/Navigation Outage Forecasting
System (C/NOFS) into orbit, which is owned and operated by the U.S. Air Force.
The second OSC launch took place on October 19 put the NASA Interstellar
Boundary Explorer mission into a highly elliptical orbit using a Pegasus XL vehicle.
SEA LAUnCh COmPAnY, LLC
Sea Launch offers the Zenit-3SL for commercial launches to GEO. The Zenit-3SL
is launched from the mobile Odyssey Launch Platform along the Equator in the
Pacific Ocean. Sea Launch returned to flight in 2008, following a January 2007
launch failure. In 2008, Sea Launch carried out five successful commercial launches,
taking communications satellites in GEO for DirecTV, the Dish Network, Intelsat,
and Thuraya. 2008 also saw the April 28 premiere of the Land Launch system,
operated by Sea Launch LLC and launched from Baikonur Cosmodrome. Boeing
is the majority shareholder (40 percent) of Sea Launch. Other partners include S. P.
Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation Energia of Russia (25 percent), Aker ASA
of Norway (20 percent), and SDO Yuzhnoye/NPO Yuzhmash of Ukraine (15
percent).
SPACE EXPLOrATIOn TEChnOLOGIES COrPOrATIOn
(SPACEX)
SpaceX is developing the Falcon series of launch vehicles for the commercial
market, as well as for government clients. SpaceX conducted its third and fourth
Falcon 1 launches in August and September. Both launches took place at the
SpaceX launch site on Omelek Island in the Kwajalein Atoll. The third launch was
• 7 •
2008 Year in Review
nominal until an error in stage separation timing caused the expended first stage to
collide with the second shortly after separation, preventing the craft from attaining
orbit. The fourth launch was completely successful, carrying a dummy payload into
LEO and marking the first successful orbital flight of a privately-developed and
operated liquid-fueled rocket.
UnITED LAUnCh ALLIAnCE (ULA)
ULA, which was formed on December 1, 2006, conducts launches for the non-
commercial U.S. government launch market. Boeing-heritage Delta vehicles and
Lockheed Martin-heritage Atlas vehicles are manufactured and operated by ULA.
The company is a 50-50 joint partnership between The Boeing Company and
Lockheed Martin Corporation. In 2008, ULA conducted four U.S. government
non-commercial launches. Three Delta II vehicles launched the following payloads:
the Navstar GPS 2RM-6 for the DoD, the GLAST (Gamma-ray Large Area Space
Telescope) and Jason 2 ocean topography spacecraft for NASA. A ULA Atlas V
vehicle was launched April, placing the NRO L-28 reconnaissance satellite into an
elliptical orbit.
UnITED SPACE ALLIAnCE (USA)
USA is the launch service company for NASA Space Shuttle missions. Like ULA,
USA is jointly owned by Boeing and Lockheed Martin. USA conducted four
successful shuttle launches from the Kennedy Space Center in 2008. Shuttles
Atlantis, Endeavour, and Discovery all made flights to assist in the completion of
the International Space Station.
• 8 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
2008 WOrLDWIDE OrbITAL LAUnCh
ACTIvITY
Launch providers from the United States,
Russia, Europe, China, Japan, India, Iran, and
the multinational consortium Sea Launch
conducted a total of 69 launch events in 2008,
28 of which were commercial (see Table 3 and
Figure 3). 2008 saw a significant increase in
commercial launches from 2007, helped in
part by the return of the Sea Launch Zenit-3SL
to service. See Table 4 for a list of non-FAA-
licensed commercial launches.
U.S.-built vehicles conducted six commercial
launches in 2008, accounting for 21 percent
of the global commercial launch market (see
Figure 4). Russia led with 11 commercial
launches, capturing 39 percent of the market, a decrease from last year. Europe
conducted five Ariane 5 commercial launches in 2008, for a 18 percent market
share. Sea Launch had five commercial launches while its Land Launch joint
venture conducted its first-ever launch to comprise a 21 percent share for
Multinational launch entitites.
The Appendix at the end of this report shows all 69 orbital launches worldwide in
2008, including commercial, civil, and military missions.
Table 3. 2008 Worldwide Orbital Launch Events
Commercial
Launches
Non-
commercial
Launches
Total
Launches
United States
6
9
15
Russia
11
15
26
Europe
5
1
6
China
0
11
11
Multinational
6
0
6
India
0
3
3
Japan
0
1
1
Iran
0
1
1
TOTAL
28
41
69
Figure 3. 2008 Total Worldwide Launch Activity
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
s
United
States
Russia Europe China Multi-
national
India Japan Iran Israel
Non-commercial
Commercial
N
umber
of
Launches
Figure 4. 2008 Worldwide Commercial Market Share
United States
6 (21%)
Europe
5 (18%)
Total: 28 Commercial orbital launches
Russia
11 (39%)
Multinational
6 (21%)
• 9 •
2008 Year in Review
WOrLDWIDE LAUnCh rEvEnUES
Revenues from the 28 commercial launch events in 2008 amounted to an estimated
US$1.97 billion, an increase of about US$360 million from the commercial
revenues achieved in 2007. U.S. commercial launch revenues for 2008 were
estimated to be US$215 million and Russian revenues were approximately US$581
million. European revenues were about US$700 million and Sea Launch had an
estimated US$475 million in commercial
launch revenue (see Figure 5).
Payments for launch services are typically
spread over one to two years prior to
launch, but for the purposes of this report,
revenue is counted in the year a customer’s
payload launches. Launch revenues are
attributed to the country in which the
primary vehicle manufacturer is based,
with the exception of Sea Launch, which is
designated simply as “multinational.â€
In the past, most launch vehicles were
manufactured, sold, and launched by the
same organization entirely in one country
Table 4. 2008 Non-FAA-Licensed Commercial Launch Events
Date
Vehicle
Payload(s)
Orbit
Launch
Outcome
11-Feb-08
Proton M
Thor 5
GEO
Success
14-Mar-08
Proton M
AMC 14
GEO
Failure
27-Mar-08
Kosmos 3M
SAR Lupe 4
LEO
Success
18-Apr-08
Ariane 5 ECA
Star One C2, Vinasat
GEO
Success
28-Apr-08
Zenit-3SLB
Amos 3
GEO
Success
12-Jun-08
Ariane 5 ECA
Turksat 3A, Skynet 5C
GEO
Success
19-Jun-08
Kosmos 3M
ORBCOMM CDS 3,
ORBCOMM Replacement
1-5, UGATUSAT
LEO
Success
07-Jul-08
Ariane 5 ECA
BADR-6, Protostar 1
GEO
Success
22-Jul-08
Kosmos 3M
SAR Lupe 5
LEO
Success
14-Aug-08
Ariane 5 ECA
AMC 21, Superbird 7
GEO
Success
19-Aug-08
Proton M
Inmarsat-4 F3
GEO
Success
29-Aug-08
Dnepr 1
RapidEye 1-5
LEO
Success
20-Sep-08
Proton M
Nimiq 4
GEO
Success
01-Oct-08
Dnepr 1
THEOS
LEO
Success
06-Nov-08
Proton M
Astra 1M
GEO
Success
10-Dec-08
Proton M
Ciel 2
GEO
Success
20-Dec-08
Ariane 5 ECA
Eutelsat W2M, Hotbird 9
GEO
Success
Figure 5. Approximate 2008 Commercial Launch Revenues
$215
$581
$700
$475
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
US$ Millions
United
States
Russia
Europe
India Multinational
• 10 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
or, in the case of Europe, within a particular economic region. With the rise of
multinational launch service corporations, however, a clean division of revenue
among countries for individual launches is difficult to assess.
Because of the proprietary nature of business transactions and the internal
financing of each organization, estimated shared revenue totals are the basis for
revenue analysis. Thus, it is difficult to determine exact annual revenues for each
launch service or to characterize them in terms of allocated percentages between
international partners. This is also true of some major component suppliers, such
as NPO Energomash of Russia, which provides the RD-180 engines used to power
the U.S. Atlas V vehicle.
For these reasons, all prices and revenue shares quoted throughout this report are
estimates.
• 11 •
2008 Year in Review
WOrLDWIDE OrbITAL PAYLOAD SUmmArY
In 2008, 69 launches carried a total of 106 payloads into orbit (see Figure 6, Figure
7, and Table 5). Of the 106 payloads, 42 provide commercial services (see Figure 8
for a breakdown of these payloads by launch country). The remaining 64 payloads
were used for non-commercial civil government, military, or non-profit purposes.
COmmErCIAL LAUnChES
Twenty-eight commercial launches carried a
total of 46 commercial and non-commercial
payloads into orbit. Two of these launches
failed. These vehicles were a Proton M
carrying AMC 14 and the third Falcon 1
carrying Celestis 6, PREsat, NanoSail-D,
and Jumpstart. All other commercial
launches were successful.
Of the 46 commercially-launched payloads,
35 provide commercial services. Fourteen of
these are NGSO satellites and 21 are GEO
satellites:
NGSO: ORBCOMM Replacements
•
1-5, ORBCOMM CDS 3, Celestis 6, Falcon 1 Flight 4’s
Mass Simulator, five RapidEye Sats, and GeoEye-1.
GEO: Star One C2, Turksat 3A, BADR-6, AMC 21,
•
Superbird 7, Protostar 1, Eutelsat W2M, Hot Bird 9,
Thuraya 3, DirecTV 11, Amos 3, Galaxy 18, Echostar
XI, Galaxy 19, Thor 5, AMC 14, Inmarsat-4 F3, Nimiq
4, Astra 1M, Ciel 2, and ICO G1.
Figure 6. 2008 Total Worldwide Launch Activity by Payload
0
10
20
30
40
50
N
umber
of
Payl
oads
s
United
States
Russia Europe China Multi-
national
India Japan Iran
Non-commercial
Commercial
Table 5. Payloads Launched by Country in 2008
Commercial
Payloads
(by service type)
Non-Commercial
Payloads
(by service type)
Total
Payloads
United States
4
14
18
Russia
22
21
43
Europe
8
3
11
China
1
13
14
Multinational
6
0
6
India
1
11
12
Japan
0
1
1
Iran
0
1
1
TOTAL
42
64
106
Figure 7. Total Payloads Launched by Country in 2008
United
States
18 (17%)
Iran
1 (1%)
Japan
1 (1%)
India
12 (11%)
Multinational
6 (6%)
China
14 (13%)
Europe
11 (10%)
Russia
43 (40%)
Total: 106 Payloads
Figure 8. Commercial Payloads Launched
by Country in 2008
6 (14%)
India
1 (2%)
United
States
4 (10%)
China
1 (2%)
Europe
8 (19%)
Multinational
Total: 42 Payloads
Russia
22 (53%)
• 12 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Eleven payloads were commercially launched to perform civil government, military,
or non-profit missions:
Five civil government satellites were launched: Vinasat to GEO, NanoSail-D,
•
PRESat, Cosmo-Skymed 3 , and THEOS to NGSO.
Five military satellites were launched: Skynet 5C to GEO, SAR Lupe 4, SAR
•
Lupe 5, C/NOFS, and Jumpstart to LEO.
And one non-profit launch of UGATUSAT to LEO.
•
nOn-COmmErCIAL LAUnChES
Of the 69 orbital launches, 41 were non-commercial launches carrying a total of
60 commercial and non-commercial payloads. Only one of these non-commercial
launches failed: Iran’s August 18 launch of its Safir vehicle with a dummy payload.
All 40 of the remaining non-commercial launches were successful.
Seven payloads were launched non-commercially to provide commercial services:
China’s Chinasat 9 and Russia’s Express AM33 to GEO; and
•
Germany’s Rubin-8 and Russia’s Gonets D1M 2, Gonets D1M 3, Gonets D1M 4,
•
and Yubileiny.
Thirty-one payloads were launched non-commercially for civil government purposes:
Seven U.S. payloads: Interstellar Boundary Explorer, ISS 1E-STS 122, ISS
•
1J/A-STS 123, STS 124, GLAST, Jason 2, and STS 126;
Six Russian payloads: Progress ISS 28P through 31P and Soyuz ISS 16S and
•
17S;
Eleven Chinese payloads: Tianlian 1, Fengyun 2E, HJ 1B, Shijian 6E and
•
6F, HJ 1A, Shenzhou 7, Chuangxin 1-02, Shiyan Weixing 3, Yaogan 5, and
Fengyun 3A;
Two European payloads: ATV 1 and GIOVE B;
•
One Japanese payload: WINDS;
•
Two Indian payloads: Chandrayaan-1 and IMS-1;
•
One Venezuelan payload: VENESAT 1; and
•
One Iranian payload: Safir dummy payload, believed to be named Omid.
•
Fifteen payloads were launched non-commercially for military use:
Two U.S. payloads: NRO L-28 and Navstar GPS 2RM-6;
•
Ten Russian payloads: Glonass M R-13 through R-18, Kosmos 2440, Kosmos
•
2441, Kosmos 2445, and Kosmos 2446;
One Chinese payload: Yaogan 4;
•
One Indian payload: CartoSat 2A; and
•
One Israeli payload: TECSAR.
•
• 13 •
2008 Year in Review
Finally, seven payloads were launched non-commercially for non-profit missions:
One Danish payload: AAUsat 2;
•
One German payload: Compass 1;
•
Two Japanese payloads: Cute 1.7 + APD 2 and SEEDS 2;
•
One Dutch payload: Delfi C3; and
•
Two Canadian payloads: CanX-2 and NLS-5.
•
LAUnCh ACTIvITIES bY COUnTrY
rUSSIA
In 2008, 26 Russian launches took place. Of these, 11 were commercial launches.
ILS launched six Proton M vehicles during the year, one of which failed. All
launches each carried one commercial GEO communications satellite. ISC
Kosmotras launched two Dnepr rockets, carrying THEOS and RapidEye 1-5. Two
commercial launches were carried out by the Russian Ministry of Defense. Both
launches used Kosmos 3M vehicles and deployed the SAR Lupe 4 and 5 satellites
for the German government. A final Kosmos 3M launch put 6 ORBCOMM
satellites into orbit. See Table 6 for a detailed breakdown of 2007 Russian launch
activity by vehicle.
Table 6. Russian Vehicle Performance in 2008
RUSSIA
Vehicle
Kosmos 3M
Molniya
Dnepr
Rockot
Soyuz
Proton K
Proton M
2008 Total Launches
3
1
2
1
9
3
7
Launch Reliability
(2008)
3/3
100%
1/1
100%
2/2
100%
1/1
100%
9/9
100%
3/3
100%
6/7
86%
Launch Reliability
(Last 10 Years)
11/11
100%
12/13
92%
11/12
92%
8/9
89%
94/95
99%
51/54
95%
23/26
88%
Year of First Launch
2004
1960
1999
1994
1963
1967
2000
Active Launch Sites
Plesetsk
Plesetsk
Baikonur
Dombarovskiy
Baikonur
Plesetsk
Baikonur
Plesetsk
Baikonur
Baikonur
LEO kg (lbs)
1,350
(2,970)
1,800
(3,960)
3,700
(8,150)
1,850
(4,075)
6,708
(14,758)
19,760
(43,570)
21,000
(46,305)
GTO kg (lbs)
--
--
--
--
1,350
(2,975)
4,430
(9,770)
5,500
(12,125)
• 14 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Russia conducted 15 non-commercial launches in 2008. Six of these were dedicated
to ISS missions. Four were Soyuz rockets carrying Progress spacecraft (ISS 28P
through 31P), while two were Soyuz vehicles carrying manned Soyuz spacecraft
that ferried individuals to and from the ISS (ISS 16S and 17S). This was the same
number of launches as 2007.
Russia conducted seven other government non-commercial launches in 2008. One
launch, of a Soyuz rocket deploying GIOVE B, was for a civil mission, while the
rest were for military purposes. Two Proton K vehicles successfully launched three
Glonass K satellites each during the year. Four Kosmos satellites were launched
during the year, each using a different vehicle: Molniya, Proton K, Soyuz, and a
Soyuz 2 1B.
Russia also conducted two non-commercial launches of commercial payloads. A
Proton M was used to lift Russia’s Express AM33 communications satellite into
GEO. Also, a Rockot was used to place three Gonets and one Yubileiny satellite
into LEO.
EUrOPE
Europe conducted six Ariane 5 launches in 2008. Five were dual-manifested
commercial launches from Kourou that placed communications satellites into
GEO. The sixth was a non-commercial launch that sent ESA’s Jules Verne ATV to
the ISS. Five Ariane 5 ECA versions were used for the commercial launches and
one ES version was used to launch the ATV. In March an ES launched the ATV
for ESA. The second launch, using an ECA, took place in April, orbiting Star One
C2 and Vietnam’s Vinasat. In June the second ECA launch deployed the British
military’s Skynet 5C and the Turksat 3A satellite. In July, an ECA version launched
the Saudi BADR-6 and the Protostar 1 into orbit. In August an ECA version
placed the AMC 21 and the Superbird 7 into orbit. The final European launch of
2008 took place in December using an ECA version. This launch placed Eutelsat
W2M and Hot Bird 9 into orbit.
Table 7 summarizes the 2008 European launch activity, as well as Chinese, Indian,
Japanese, and Iranian launch activity, organized by country and vehicle.
ChInA
China had an eventful 2008, conducting a record high 11 orbital launches, which
were all non-commercial. This total is one more launch than what China conducted
in 2007. China did not have any commercially-competed launches in 2008, though
they did launch two GEO satellites that will provide commercial communications
services: Chinasat 9 on a Long March 3B and Venezuela’s VENESAT 1 on a Long
March 3B, both from the Xichang launch site.
The remaining nine Chinese launches carried primary payloads with government
missions. Most notable was the September launch of Shenzhou 7. This was China’s
third manned space launch and the first to carry a full compliment of three
taikonauts. Two taikonauts also performed a spacewalk, a first for China. Two
• 15 •
2008 Year in Review
launches carried multiple satellites: a Long March 2C from Taiyuan in September
that deployed HJ 1A and HJ 1B, and a Long March 4B, also from Taiyuan, that
deployed Shijian 5 and 6. The rest of the flights used various Long March vehicles
launching one government satellite each.
InDIA
The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) performed three successful
launches in 2008, including its first-ever lunar probe, the Chaadrayaan-1. The
lunar launch occurred in October using a Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV).
Chandryaan-1 reached the Moon in early November and deployed a sub-probe to
impact the lunar surface.
Table 7. European, Chinese, Indian, Japanese, Iranian, and Ukrainian Launch Vehicle Performance in 2008
EUROPE
CHINA
INDIA
JAPAN
IRAN
LAND
LAUNCH
Vehicle
Ariane 5
Long
March
4B
Long
March
2C
Long
March
2D
Long
March
2F
Long
March
3C
Long
March
4C
Long
March
3A
Long
March
3B
PSLV
H 2A
Safir
Zenit-3SLB
Country/
Region
Europe
China
China
China
China
China
China
China
China
India
Japan
Iran
Ukraine
2008 Total
Launches
6
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
Launch
Reliability
(2008)
6/6
100%
2/2
100%
1/1
100%
2/2
100%
1/1
100%
1/1
100%
1/1
100%
1/1
100%
2/2
100%
3/3
100%
1/1
100%
0/1
0%
1/1
100%
Launch
Reliability
(Last 10
Years)
38/39
97%
12/12
100%
10/10
100%
7/7
100%
7/7
100%
1/1
100%
2/2
100%
13/13
100%
6/6
100%
10/10
100%
13/15
87%
0/1
0%
1/1
100%
Year of First
Launch
1996
1999
1975
1992
1999
2008
2007
1994
1996
1993
2001
2008
2007
Active
Launch Sites
Kourou
Taiyuan
Jiuquan,
Taiyuan,
Xichang
Jiuquan Jiuquan Xichang Taiyuan Taiyuan,
Xichang Xichang
Satish
Dhawan Tanegashima
Iran
Space
Center
Baikonur
Cosmodrome
LEO kg (lbs)
17,250
(37,950)
2,800
(6,170)
3,200
(7,048)
3,500
(7,700)
9,500
(20,900)
3,700
(8,200)
4,200
(9,250)
6,000
(13,225)
13,562
(29,900)
3,700
(8,150)
11,730
(25,860)
?
13,920
(30,624)
GTO kg (lbs)
10,500
(23,127)
--
1,000
(2,203)
1,250
(2,750)
3,500
(7,700)
--
1,500
(3,300)
2,600
(5,700)
4,491
(9,900)
800
(1,760)
5,800
(12,800)
?
4120
(9060)
• 16 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
A non-commercial PSLV launch occurred in January 2008, carrying the TECSAR
radar imaging satellite for the Israeli military. A second non-commercial PSLV
launch took place in April placing ten satellites into orbit. The main payload was
the Indian military’s Cartosat 2A. Also aboard was an civilian Indian IMS imaging
satellite. The German commercial Rubin-8 technology demonstrator was deployed.
The remaining seven satellites were a series of experimental cubesats deployed on
a non-profit basis from several European countries. All Indian launches took place
from the Satish Dhawan Space Center.
JAPAn
Japan had one successful launch in 2008 which used an H-2A vehicle launched
from the government site at Tanegashima in February. The launch carried a satellite
for the Japanese government. The WINDS experimental wideband internet satellite
was placed in GEO.
IrAn
Iran conducted its first orbital launch attempt on August 18. The payload, Omid,
was believed to be a dummy satellite. The launch vehicle was a Safir two-stage
orbital rocket. The non-commercial flight did not reach orbit and is considered
a launch failure. Further information has not been released by the Iranian
government.
• 17 •
2008 Year in Review
FIvE-YEAr WOrLDWIDE SPACE
TrAnSPOrTATIOn TrEnDS
OvErvIEW
Between 2004 and 2008, there was an average
of 62 orbital launches per year worldwide (see
Figure 9).
Over the past five years, Russia and the United
States have conducted the most orbital launches,
followed by China and Europe (see Figure 10).
There have been a total of 312 orbital launches
conducted during the past five years.
One hundred and six commercial orbital
launches took place during the same five-year
period, with an increasing trend from 15 in 2004
to 28 in 2008. Since 2004, the United States has
carried out 18 commercial launches. Russia and Europe both exceed this count
with 45 and 22 commercial launches, respectively. The multinational Sea Launch
Company performed 19 commercial launches, while India and China each have
one (see Figure 11).
The demand for commercial NGSO launches, which reached its zenith in the late
1990s, had been lagging during the four years prior to 2007. Both 2007 and 2008
showed a significant rebound in this demand. See Figure 12 for a breakdown of
commercial launches by orbit type for the last five years.
Figure 13 shows the number of payloads providing commercial services launched
on commercial and non-commercial vehicles over the past five years. The number
of commercial GEO satellites launched each year since 2003 has remained between
Figure 9. Five-Year Summary (2004–2008) of Commercial and
Non-commercial Launch Events
15
39
18
37
21
45
24
44
28
41
0
20
40
60
80
100
Numbe
r of Orbita
l La
unc
he
s
s
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Non-Commercial Launches
Commercial Launches
Figure 10. Five-Year Worldwide Total Orbital
Commercial and Non-commercial
Launch Industry Share (2004–2008)
Russia
125 (39%)
Europe
25 (8%)
China
40 (13%)
Multinational
19 (6%)
Japan
11 (4%)
India
9 (3%)
United States
80 (26%)
Iran, 1, (0.3%)
Israel
1 (0.3%)
Total: 312 Launches
Figure 11. Five-Year Worldwide Commercial Orbital
Launch Market Share (2004–2008)
India
1 (1%)
Europe
22 (21%)
United States
18 (17%)
China
1 (1%)
Multinational
19 (18%)
Total: 106 Launches
Russia
45 (42%)
• 18 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
15 and 23 satellites. The number of commercial NGSO satellites launched per year
averaged two from 2004 to 2006, but the 13 payloads in 2007 and 19 in 2008 breaks
this previous low trend. There was a slight dip in the number of commercial NGSO
launches in 2008, but it still remains higher than the three years previous to 2007.
Commercial launch revenues
during the period, highlighted in
Figure 14 and Table 8, showed a
similar trend to the total number
of commercial launches. Revenues
steadily increased from 2004 to
2008. Revenues grew almost 100
percent between 2004 and 2008,
from roughly US$1 billion to
nearly US$2 billion.
Figure 12. Five-Year Worldwide Commercial GEO and NGSO Launch
Events (2004–2008)
2
13
3
15
5
16
12
12
10
18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Number of O
rbi
tal
Launc
hes
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
GEO
NGSO
Figure 13. Five-Year Summary of Commercial Payloads Launched
by Orbit (2004–2008)
2
15
19
3
20
13
18
19
23
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
GEO
NGSO
Number of O
rbi
tal
Commercial payloads
1
Figure 14. Approximate Launch Revenues for Commercial Launch Events
(2004–2008)
1
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
India
Multinational
Russia
Europe
USA
U
S$
M
ill
io
ns
Table 8. Approximate Launch Revenues for
Commercial Launch Events 2004–2008 (US$M)
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
United States
375
70
140
150
215
Russia
290
350
374
477
700
Europe
140
490
560
840
581
India
0
0
0
11
0
Multinational
210
280
350
70
475
TOTAL 1,015 1,190 1,424 1,548 1,971
• 19 •
2008 Year in Review
COmmErCIAL SATELLITE AnD LAUnCh TrEnDS
The commercial space transportation market is driven largely by the demand for
launches of GEO telecommunications satellites and, to a lesser extent, a variety of
NGSO satellites, especially in the last two years. Since 2004, nearly 70 percent of
commercial launches have been to GEO, which generates more revenue than the
NGSO market and generally deploys larger payloads. GEO satellites lead again in
2008 and they will likely still be the primary commercial market driver in the near
term. The following trends are expected:
Limited growth of launch demand for GEO communications satellites;
•
A near-term trend of heavier GEO satellites followed by a decline;
•
Some limited growth in small mass GEO satellites; and
•
Some growth in launch demand for NGSO communications satellites as
•
existing constellations are replenished or replaced with next-generation systems
and as new vehicles become available.
These satellite industry trends will be augmented by continued competition among
the United States, Europe, Russia, India, Japan, and multinational firms such as Sea
Launch to provide launch services. China is likely to continue with non-competed
launches of commercial satellites, some of which, known as “ITAR-free†satellites,
have excluded U.S. components in order to avoid U.S. export controls.
SpaceX made two FAA-licensed launches in 2008, being the third and fourth
launches of the Falcon 1 rocket. The fourth launch, which took place in September,
was the first completely successful launch of the Falcon 1. SpaceX is also developing
its larger Falcon 9 rocket. With its first test launch scheduled for 2009, the Falcon 9
could grow to compete with other heavy-lift rockets such as the Zenit-3SL, Proton,
and Ariane 5. The Taurus II medium-class vehicle is being developed by Orbital
Sciences for a 2010 debut.
2008 also saw the debut of the Land Launch Zenit-3SLB rocket. It is essentially a
Zenit-3SL slightly modified to launch from Baikonur Cosmodrome instead of the
Sea Launch platform. Its April launch lifted the Israeli AMOS-3 communications
satellite into GEO. Land Launch is a collaboration between Sea Launch and
Moscow-based Space International Services.
South Korea is also developing a small launch vehicle, designated the Korea
Space Launch Vehicle (KSLV), that may eventually help that country enter the
commercial market. Europe’s Vega small launch vehicle could also enter the
commercial market in 2010.
InTErnATIOnALLY COmPETED LAUnChES
As commercial space business increases and replaces various forms of traditionally
government-operated activities, the definitions of “commercial payload†and
• 20 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
“commercial launch†become more complex
and open to interpretation. Figure 15 shows
trends for each country whose launch providers
compete in the international marketplace. The
chart reflects only launch service providers
competing in the international marketplace for
open-bid launch service contracts.
From 2004 to 2008, there were 97 internationally-
competed launch events.
Figure 15. Five-Year Worldwide Internationally Competed Launch Events
(2004-2008)*
1
N
umber
of
Launches
6
5
1
3
1
8
5
4
1
9
5
5
3
12
6
1
1
2
8
4
6
0
5
10
15
20
25
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
India
Multinational
Europe
Russia
United States
* An internationally competed launch contract is one in which the launch opportunity was available
in principle to any capable launch service provider. For Figure 15 only, this definition precludes
government sponsored payloads launched commercially (some have been licensed by FAA/AST)
when government policy prohibits open competition for the launch. The definition also does not
cover payloads captive to their own launch providers (a distinction that is made by either a country
or launch service company), test payloads, dummy payloads, or small secondary payloads.
• 21 •
2008 Year in Review
2008 FAA EXPErImEnTAL PErmIT FLIGhT
SUmmArY
In 2008, there were five low-altitude flights conducted under the authority of FAA
experimental permits. This total is four less than what ocurred in 2007. All 2008
flights used developmental vertical-takeoff, vertical-landing vehicles. Four were
conducted by perennial flyer Armadillo Aerospace with two different vehicles
(Pixel and MOD-1) and one was conducted by a new entrant, TrueZer0.
All five permit flights took place at Las Cruces International Airport in New
Mexico as part of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. Table 9 lists
details of the five flights that took place in 2008.
In contrast to FAA-licensed flights, permitted flights are limited to reusable
suborbital launch vehicles and intended for technology development, particular
testing for crew, or testing prior to obtaining a license. Vehicles cannot carry
property or people for compensation or hire. The first permit flights took place in
2006 after authority was granted by the U.S. Congress in 2004.
Table 9. FAA-Permitted Launches in 2008
Flight Date
Operator
Vehicle
Launch Site
October 24
TrueZer0
Ignignokt
Las Cruces International Airport, NM
October 24
Armadillo Aerospace
MOD 1
Las Cruces International Airport, NM
October 24
Armadillo Aerospace
MOD 1
Las Cruces International Airport, NM
October 24
Armadillo Aerospace
MOD 1
Las Cruces International Airport, NM
October 25
Armadillo Aerospace
Pixel
Las Cruces International Airport, NM
• 22 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
APPEnDIX: 2008 WOrLDWIDE OrbITAL LAUnCh EvEnTS
Date
Vehicle
Site
Payload(s)
Orbit Operator
Manufacturer
Use
Comm'l
Price
L M
15-Jan-2008 V Zenit-3SL
Odyssey Launch Platform * Thuraya 3
GEO
Thuraya Satellite
Communications Company
Boeing Satellite Systems
Communications $85M
S S
21-Jan-2008
PSLV
Satish Dhawan Space
Center
TECSAR
LEO
Israel MoD
Israel Aerospace Industries Intelligence
S S
28-Jan-2008
Proton M
Baikonur
* Express AM33 GEO
Russian Satellite
Communciation Co.
NPO PM
Communications
S S
5-Feb-2008
Soyuz
Baikonur
Progress ISS 28P LEO
Roscosmos
RSC Energia
Supply
S S
7-Feb-2008
Shuttle Atlantis
Kennedy Space Center
STS 122
Columbus
ISS 1E
LEO
LEO
LEO
NASA
European Space Agency
NASA
Rockwell International
EADS
EADS
Crewed
Space Station
Space Station
S
S
S
S
S
S
11-Feb-2008 V Proton M
Baikonur
* Thor 5
GEO
Telenor A.S.
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Communications $85M
S S
23-Feb-2008
H 2A 2024
Tanegashima
WINDS
GEO
JAXA
JAXA
Development
S S
9-Mar-2008
Ariane 5 ES-ATV Kourou
ATV 1
LEO
European Space Agency
EADS
Space Station
S S
11-Mar-2008
Shuttle Endeavour Kennedy Space Center
STS 123
ISS 1J/A
LEO
LEO
NASA
JAXA
Rockwell International
Mitsubishi
Crewed
Space Station
S
S
S
S
13-Mar-2008
Atlas 5 411
Vandenberg AFB
NRO L-28
ELI
NRO
The Boeing Company
Classified
S S
14-Mar-2008 V Proton M
Baikonur
* AMC 14
GEO
SES Americom
Lockheed Martin
Commercial Space Systems
Communications $85M
F F
15-Mar-2008
Delta 2 7925-10 Cape Canaveral AFS
Navstar GPS
2RM-6
MEO
U.S. Air Force
Lockheed Martin Corp.
Navigation
S S
19-Mar-2008 V Zenit-3SL
Odyssey Launch Platform * DirecTV 11
GEO
DirecTV, Inc.
Boeing Satellite Systems
Communications $85M
S S
27-Mar-2008 V Kosmos 3M
Plesetsk
SAR Lupe 4
LEO
German Defense Ministry OHB System
Intelligence
$12M
S S
8-Apr-2008
Soyuz
Baikonur
Soyuz ISS 16S LEO
Roscosmos
RSC Energia
Space Station
S S
14-Apr-2008 V Atlas 5 421
Cape Canaveral AFS
* ICO G1
GEO
ICO Global
Communications
Space Systems/Loral
Communications $85M
S S
16-Apr-2008 V Pegasus XL
Kwajalein Island
C/NOFS
LEO
U.S. Air Force
Spectrum Astro, Inc.
Scientific
$16M
S S
18-Apr-2008 V Ariane 5 ECA
Kourou
*
Vinasat
Star One C2
GEO
GEO
Vietnamese Ministry
of Post and
Telecommunications
Star One
Lockheed Martin Corp.
Alcatel Espace
Communications
Communications
$140M
S
S
S
S
25-Apr-2008
Long March 3C
Xichang
Tianlian 1
GEO
Chinese National Space
Administration
Chinese Academy of Space
Technology
Communications
S S
27-Apr-2008
Soyuz
Baikonur
GIOVE B
MEO
European Space Agency
Galileo Industries
Navigation
S S
28-Apr-2008 V Zenit-3SLB
Baikonur
* Amos 3
GEO
SpaceCom Limited
Israel Aerospace Industries Communications $50M
S S
28-Apr-2008
PSLV
Satish Dhawan Space
Cartosat 2A
LEO
ISRO
ISRO
Remote Sensing
S S
Center
* Rubin-8
LEO
Cosmos International
GmbH
Cosmos International GmbH Communications
S S
AAUsat 2
LEO
Aalborg University
Aalborg University
Development
S S
Cute 1.7 +
APD 2
LEO
Tokyo Institute of
Technology
Tokyo Institute of
Technology
Development
S S
Delfi C3
LEO
Delft University
Delft University
Development
S S
NLS-5
LEO
University of Toronto
University of Toronto
Remote Sensing
S S
CanX-2
LEO
University of Toronto
University of Toronto
Development
S S
IMS 1
LEO
ISRO
ISRO
Remote Sensing
S S
SEEDS 2
LEO
Nihon University
Nihon University
Development
S S
Compass 1
LEO
Aachen University of
Applied Sciences
Aachen University of
Applied Sciences
Development
S S
V Denotes commercial launch, defined as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately-financed launch activity.
* Denotes a commercial payload, defined as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
See page 1 and 2 for definitions of payload orbits.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Note: All launch dates are based on local time at the launch site.
Note: All prices are estimates.
• 23 •
2008 Year in Review
APPEnDIX: 2008 WOrLDWIDE OrbITAL LAUnCh EvEnTS (COnT’D)
Date
Vehicle
Site
Payload(s)
Orbit Operator
Manufacturer
Use
Comm'l
Price
L M
15-May-2008
Soyuz
Baikonur
Progress ISS 29P LEO
Roscosmos
RSC Energia
Supply
S S
21-May-2008 V Zenit-3SL
Odyssey Launch Platform * Galaxy 18
GEO
Intelsat
Space Systems/Loral
Communications $85M
S S
23-May-2008
Rockot
Plesetsk
*
*
*
*
Gonets D1M 2
Yubileiny
Gonets D1M 3
Gonets D1M 4
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
Roscosmos
Roscosmos
Roscosmos
Roscosmos
NPO PM
NPO PM
NPO PM
NPO PM
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
27-May-2008
Long March 4C
Taiyuan
Fengyun 3A
SSO
China Meteorological
Administration
Shanghai Bureau of
Astronautics
Meteorological
S S
31-May-2008
Shuttle Discovery Kennedy Space Center
STS 124
Cupola 1
Port Rails 1
JEM RMS
Solar Arrays SPP
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
NASA
NASA
NASA
NASA
NASA
Rockwell International
NASA
NASA
Mitsubishi
NASA
Crewed
Space Station
Space Station
Space Station
Space Station
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
9-Jun-2008
Long March 3B
Xichang
* Chinasat 9
GEO
Chinese
Telecommunications
Broadcasting Satellite
Corp.
Alcatel Alenia Space
Communications
S S
11-Jun-2008
Delta 2 7920H
Cape Canaveral AFS
GLAST
LEO
NASA
General Dynamics
Scientific
S S
12-Jun-2008 V Ariane 5 ECA
Kourou
*
Skynet 5C
Turksat 3A
GEO
GEO
Paradigm Secure
Communications Ltd.
Turkish Telecom
EADS
Alcatel Alenia Space
Communications
Communications
$140M
S
S
S
S
19-Jun-2008 V Kosmos 3M
Kapustin Yar
* Orbcomm
CDS 3
LEO
Orbital Communications
Corp. (ORBCOMM)
OHB System
Development
$12M
S S
* Orbcomm
Replacement 1
LEO
Orbital Communications
Corp. (ORBCOMM)
OHB System
Communications
S S
* Orbcomm
Replacement 2
LEO
Orbital Communications
Corp. (ORBCOMM)
OHB System
Communications
S S
* Orbcomm
Replacement 3
LEO
Orbital Communications
Corp. (ORBCOMM)
OHB System
Communications
S S
* Orbcomm
Replacement 4
LEO
Orbital Communications
Corp. (ORBCOMM)
OHB System
Communications
S S
* Orbcomm
Replacement 5
LEO
Orbital Communications
Corp. (ORBCOMM)
OHB System
Communications
S S
UGATUSAT
LEO
UGATU
UGATU
Scientific
S S
20-Jun-2008
Delta 2 7320
Vandenberg AFB
Jason 2
LEO
Eumetsat
Alcatel Alenia Space
Meteorological
S S
27-Jun-2008
Proton (SL-12)
Baikonur
Kosmos 2440 GEO
Russian MoD
NPO PM
Military
S S
7-Jul-2008
V Ariane 5 ECA
Kourou
*
*
Protostar
BADR-6
GEO
GEO
Protostar Ltd.
Arab Satellite
Communications
Organization (Arabsat)
Space Systems/Loral
EADS Astrium
Communications
Communications
$140M
S
S
S
S
15-Jul-2008 V Zenit-3SL
Odyssey Launch Platform * Echostar XI
GEO
Echostar Communications
Corporation
Space Systems/Loral
Communications $85M
S S
22-Jul-2008 V Kosmos 3M
Plesetsk
SAR Lupe 5
LEO
German Defense Ministry OHB System
Intelligence
$12M
S S
26-Jul-2008
Soyuz 2 1B
Plesetsk
Kosmos 2441 MEO
Russian MoD
NPO PM
Military
S S
3-Aug-2008 V Falcon 1
Kwajalein Island
* Jumpstart
Celestis 6
NanoSail-D
PRESat
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
ORS Office
Celestis, Inc.
NASA
NASA
SpaceDev, Inc.
Celestis, Inc.
NASA
NASA
Development
Other
Scientific
Scientific
$7M
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
14-Aug-2008 V Ariane 5 ECA
Kourou
*
*
Superbird 7
AMC 21
GEO
GEO
Space Communications Corp.
SES Americom
Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
Alcatel Alenia Space
Communications
Communications
$140M
S
S
S
S
V Denotes commercial launch, defined as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately-financed launch activity.
* Denotes a commercial payload, defined as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
See page 1 and 2 for definitions of payload orbits.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Note: All launch dates are based on local time at the launch site.
Note: All prices are estimates.
• 24 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Date
Vehicle
Site
Payload(s)
Orbit Operator
Manufacturer
Use
Comm'l
Price
L M
17-Aug-2008
Safir
Iran
Iran Dummy
Satellite
LEO
Iran's Aerospace
Organization
Iran’s Aerospace
Organization
Development
F F
19-Aug-2008 V Proton M
Baikonur
* Inmarsat-4 F3 GEO
Inmarsat
EADS Astrium
Communications $85M
S S
29-Aug-2008 V Dnepr 1
Baikonur
* RapidEye 1
SSO
RapidEye AG
MacDonald, Dettwiler and
Associates
Remote Sensing $17.5M
S S
* RapidEye 2
SSO
RapidEye AG
MacDonald, Dettwiler and
Associates
Remote Sensing
S S
* RapidEye 3
SSO
RapidEye AG
MacDonald, Dettwiler and
Associates
Remote Sensing
S S
* RapidEye 4
SSO
RapidEye AG
MacDonald, Dettwiler and
Associates
Remote Sensing
S S
* RapidEye 5
SSO
RapidEye AG
MacDonald, Dettwiler and
Associates
Remote Sensing
S S
6-Sep-2008 V Delta 2 7420-10 Vandenberg AFB
* GeoEye 1
SSO
GeoEye
General Dynamics
Remote Sensing $50M
S S
06-Sep-08
Long March 2C
Xichang
HJ 1A
HJ 1B
LEO
LEO
China National Space
Administration
China National Space
Administration
CAST
CAST
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing
S
S
S
S
10-Sep-08
Soyuz
Baikonur
Progress ISS 30P LEO
Roscosmos
RSC Energia
Supply
S S
20-Sep-08
V Proton M
Baikonur
* Nimiq 4
GEO
Telesat Canada
EADS Astrium
Communications $85M
S S
24-Sep-08
V Zenit-3SL
Odyssey Launch Platform * Galaxy 19
GEO
Intelsat
Space Systems/Loral
Communications $85M
S S
25-Sep-08
Long March 2F
Jiuquan
Shenzhou 7
LEO
China National Space
Administration
Shanghai Academy of
Spaceflight Technology
Division
Crewed
S S
25-Sep-08
Proton (SL-12)
Baikonur
Glonass M R13
Glonass M R14
Glonass M R15
MEO
MEO
MEO
Russian MoD
Russian MoD
Russian MoD
NPO PM
NPO PM
NPO PM
Navigation
Navigation
Navigation
S
S
S
S
S
S
28-Sep-08
V Falcon 1
Kwajalein Island
* Flight 4
LEO
Space Exploration
Technologies
Space Exploration
Technologies
Development
$7M
S S
01-Oct-08
V Dnepr 1
Dombarovskiy
THEOS
SSO
GISTDA
EADS Astrium
Remote Sensing $17.5M
S S
12-Oct-08
Soyuz
Baikonur
Soyuz ISS 17S LEO
Roscosmos
RSC Energia
Space Station
S S
19-Oct-08
Pegasus XL
Kwajalein Island
Interstellar
Boundary
Explorer
ELI
NASA
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Scientific
S S
22-Oct-08
PSLV
Satish Dhawan Space
Center
Chandrayaan 1 EXT
ISRO
ISRO
Scientific
S S
24-Oct-08
V Delta 2 7420-10 Vandenberg AFB
Cosmo-
Skymed 3
LEO
Italian Space Agency (ASI) Alenia Spazio
Remote Sensing $50M
S S
25-Oct-08
Long March 4B
Taiyuan
Shijian 6F
Shijian 6E
LEO
LEO
China National Space
Administration
China National Space
Administration
China Great Wall Industry
Corp. (CGWIC)
China Great Wall Industry
Corp. (CGWIC)
Scientific
Scientific
S
S
S
S
30-Oct-08
Long March 3B
Xichang
VENESAT 1
GEO
Venezuelan Ministry of
Science and Technology
China Great Wall Industry
Corp. (CGWIC)
Communications
S S
05-Nov-08
Long March 2D Jiuquan
Shiyan
Weixing 3
Chuangxin 1-02
LEO
LEO
China
China Meteorological
Administration
Harbin Institute of
Technology
Chinese Academy of
Sciences
Development
Meteorological
S
S
S
S
06-Nov-08
V Proton M
Baikonur
* Astra 1M
GEO
SES Astra
EADS Astrium
Communications $85M
S S
V Denotes commercial launch, defined as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately-financed launch activity.
* Denotes a commercial payload, defined as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
See page 1 and 2 for definitions of payload orbits.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Note: All launch dates are based on local time at the launch site.
Note: All prices are estimates.
APPEnDIX: 2008 WOrLDWIDE OrbITAL LAUnCh EvEnTS (COnT’D)
• 25 •
2008 Year in Review
Date
Vehicle
Site
Payload(s)
Orbit Operator
Manufacturer
Use
Comm'l
Price
L M
14-Nov-08
Soyuz
Baikonur
Kosmos 2445 LEO
Russian MoD
Russia - TBA
Intelligence
S S
14-Nov-08
Shuttle Endeavour Kennedy Space Center
STS 126
MPLM 5
LEO
LEO
NASA
NASA
Rockwell International
NASA
Crewed
Space Station
S
S
S
S
26-Nov-08
Soyuz
Baikonur
Progress ISS 31P LEO
Roscosmos
RSC Energia
Supply
S S
01-Dec-08
Long March 2D Jiuquan
Yaogan 4
LEO
China National Space
Administration
Chinese Academy of Space
Technology
Remote Sensing
S S
02-Dec-08
Molniya
Plesetsk
Kosmos 2446 ELI
Russian Space Forces
NPO Lavotchkin
Military
S S
10-Dec-08
V Proton M
Baikonur
* Ciel 2
GEO
Ciel Satellite
Thales Alenia Space
Communications $85M
S S
15-Dec-08
Long March 4B
Taiyuan
Yaogan 5
LEO
China National Space
Administration
CAST
Remote Sensing
S S
20-Dec-08
V Ariane 5 ECA
Kourou
*
*
Hot Bird 9
Eutelsat W2M
GEO
GEO
Eutelsat
Eutelsat
EADS Astrium
EADS Astrium
Communications
Communications
$140M
S
S
S
S
23-Dec-08
Long March 3A
Xichang
Fengyun 2E
GEO
China Meteorological
Administration
Shanghai Academy of
Spaceflight Technology
Division
Meteorological
S S
25-Dec-08
Proton (SL-12)
Baikonur
Glonass M R16
Glonass M R17
Glonass M R18
MEO
MEO
MEO
Russian MoD
Russian MoD
Russian MoD
NPO PM
NPO PM
NPO PM
Navigation
Navigation
Navigation
S
S
S
S
S
S
V Denotes commercial launch, defined as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately-financed launch activity.
* Denotes a commercial payload, defined as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
See page 1 and 2 for definitions of payload orbits.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Note: All launch dates are based on local time at the launch site.
Note: All prices are estimates.
APPEnDIX: 2008 WOrLDWIDE OrbITAL LAUnCh EvEnTS (COnT’D)
• 26 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation