background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

 

EVIDENCES FOR TESTING HYPOTHESES 

ABOUT THE BODY IMAGE FORMATION OF 

THE

 

TURIN SHROUD

 

 

Giulio Fanti

1

, Barrie Schwortz

2

, August Accetta

3

, JosĂ© A. Botella

4

, Berns  J. Buenaobra

5

Manuel Carreira

6

, Frank Cheng

7

,  

Fabio Crosilla

8

, R. Dinegar

9

, Helmut Felzmann

10

, Bob 

Haroldsen

11

, Piero Iacazio

12

, Francesco Lattarulo

13

, Giovanni Novelli

14

 

Joe Marino

15

Alessandro Malantrucco

16

, Paul Maloney

17

, Daniel Porter

18

, Bruno Pozzetto

19

, Ray 

Schneider

20

, Niels Svensson

21

, Traudl Wally

22

, Alan D. Whanger

23

, Frederick Zugibe

24

 

 

ShroudScience Group on Yahoo! 

1

 Assoc. Prof. of Mechanical Measurements, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Padua,   

Via Venezia 1, 35137 Padua  - Italy,  e-mail: <giulio.fanti@unipd.it> 

STURP Documenting Photographer and, Editor & Publisher of Shroud.com, 1094 Highland Meadows Dr.,  

Florissant, CO 80816, U.S.A. 

Shroud Center of Southern California 8840 Warner Avenue Suite 200 Fountain Valley, California, 92708 U.S.A. 

e-mail: :  Sja73088@aol.com 

4

 UniversitĂ€t Regensburg Lehrstuhl fĂŒr Entwicklungsbiologie. UniversitĂ€tstrasse 31 D-93040. Regensburg, Deutchland  

e-mail : jose.botella-munoz@biologie.uni-regensburg.de 

University of the Philippines, National Institute of Physics Instrumentation Physics Laboratory  Diliman Campus, 1 

101 Quezon City, Philippines, e-mail: bbuenaobra@nip.upd.edu.ph 

PhD in Physics, member also of the Vatican Observatory e-mail: ecarreira@res.upco.es 

7

 Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry , University of Idaho , Moscow, Idaho83844-2343, USA , tel. 208-885-6387  

e-mail: <ifcheng@uidaho.edu>; http://oxygen.chem.uidaho.edu/ifcheng/default.htm 

Full Professor of Photogrammetry-Faculty of Engineering-University of Udine via Cotonificio 114 Udine Italy- 

fabio.crosilla@uniud.it 

9

 University of New Mexico at Los Alamos 4000 University Dr, Los Alamos, NM 87544  USA 

10

Albrecht DĂŒrer Ring 48, 83607 Holzkirchen, Germany; e-mail: Felzmann@Online.de 

11

 e-mail: bobbycindi@aol.com 

12

 Via Roma 84, 13812 Campiglia Cervo (BI)  - Italy, +39-015 60242 , e-mail:pieroiac@tin.it 

13

 Full Prof. Department of  Electtrotechnics and ed Electronics, Politecnico di Bari - via Orabona, 4 - 70125 Bari 

e-mail: <lattarulo@poliba.it> 

14 

Chem. Ph.D. Dr. - Industrial Consultant; member of "SocietĂ  Chimica Italiana - Rome" 

Address: Piazza Attias, 13 p. IV - 57123 Livorno, fax: +39-0586-839553 

15 

e-mail: JMARINO240@aol.com 

16 

Via Flavio Stilicone, 264   00175   Roma   (Italia) +39-06-71545218 +39-338-7581847 e-mail: a.malantrucco@theolabam.it 

17 

e-mail: paulcm@netcarrier.com  

18 

Business Executive, Bronxville, New York, USA, e-mail: porter@innoval.com 

19 

Laboratoire de BactĂ©riologie-VirologieGIMAP, FacultĂ© de MĂ©decine Jacques Lisfranc 42023 Saint-Etienne cedex 02, France  

e-mail : Bruno.Pozzetto@univ-st-etienne.fr 

20

 P.E., Ph.D., Asst. Professor Math and Computer Science, Bridgewater College 402 E. College St. McK-231, Bridgewater,  

VA 22812  USA, 1-540-828-5623, e-mail: rschneid@bridgewater.edu> 

21

 Kalvemosevej 4, DK-4930 Maribo Denmark, Phone: +45 54715005 Fax: +45 54715393 E-mail: nsvensson@dadlnet.dk 

22 

Untere Augartenstraße 32, 1020, Wien- Austria, traudlwally@yhoo.de  

23

 M. D.  Council for Study of the Shroud of Turin 1712 Woodburn Road Durham, North Carolina 27705 USA  

Tele/fax:  919-489-3279 E-mail:  adw2@acpub.duke.edu Website:  www.shroudcouncil.org 

24 

One Angelus Drive

Garnerville, N.Y., 10923-2022, e-mail: ftzugibe@msn.com 

 
FOREWORD 
 
This paper has been written in honour of the lamented Raymond Rogers who first proposed 
this work and  dedicated many hours of his life to improve this collection of information; he 
wrote:  

“No matter what the truth is about the Shroud, it is a fascinating study. 

It can be studied according to the rigorous Scientific Method, 

and it is too bad that so many wild flights of fancy have destroyed the credibility of the studies. 

Maybe we can restore some science to the discussions.” 

ShroudScience Group and the present paper are a first effort to realize Ray’s hope. 

 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

SUMMARY 

 

This paper is the first document, still in progress, that derives from a very wide discussion on the 

Yahoo! Shroud Science Group and has the aim to present all the evidences detected on the Turin 
Shroud that can be useful for a further discussion about the problem of the body image formation. 
Many hypotheses about the image formation have been  proposed, but, up to now, none, 
scientifically testable, satisfies simultaneously all the facts detected on the Shroud.  

The Group has the aim to consider in depth, all the possible hypotheses proposed or to improve 

some  others in order to determine if some mechanism, more or less complicated, is able to explain 
all the many peculiarities of the Shroud. 

This aim is not simple because the Group has no access, for the moment, to the results of the new 

tests on the Shroud made under the guidance of Prof. P. Savarino, scientific consultant of the 
Custodian Card. S. Poletto, in 2000 and during its “restoration” in 2002. In any case the Group has 
re-analyzed many data also coming from tests done in 1978 by the STURP (Shroud of TUrin 
Research Project) Group and has collected  considerable information that clarifies the complex 
aspects of this sheet; hopefully  this information will be improved upon when the Turin data  
becomes available. 

In this document a list of facts directly related to the Turin Shroud, subdivided in  four sections, is 

presented. The first section describes unquestionable facts detected on the Turin Shroud; the second 
one refers to  confirmed observations

 

or conclusions based on a proof  made in reference to Turin 

Shroud studies; the third one refers to facts or observations that were evidenced by some researcher 
but that are not universally accepted; the fourth one, assuming a scenario that the Shroud is actually 
the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth, includes correspondences with the Scriptures. 

 

 

1) INTRODUCTION 

 

The Turin Shroud (TS) is believed by many to be the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth when he 

was put in a tomb in Palestine about 2000 years ago. It has generated considerable controversy but 
unlike other controversial subjects (e.g. flying saucers and ghosts), the TS exist as a material object: 
it can  directly and objectively be  observed. The results of studies can be analyzed by scientific 
methods 

(Schwalbe 1982)

.  

The TS is a linen sheet about 4.4 m long and 1.1 m wide, in which the comp lete front and back 

body images of a man are impressed. Of all religious relics it has generated the greatest interest. 
The cloth is hand- made and each yarn (diameter about 0.25 mm) is composed of 70-120 linen 
fibers. Although not all scientists are unanimous, it has been shown by many scientists that the linen 
sheet enveloped or wrapped the corpse of a man who had been scourged, crowned with thorns, 
crucified with nails, and stabbed by a lance in the side. Also impressed are many other marks due to 
blood,  fire, water and folding, which have greatly damaged the double body image. Of greatest 
interest are the wounds which, to forensic pathologists, appear to be unfakeable 

(Fanti and Moroni 2002). 

The "Shroud of Christ" appeared in 1353 in Lirey, France, under mysterious circumstances and 

with no documentation whatever. In 1203, a soldier camping outside Constantinople with the 
Crusaders, who sacked the city the following year, noted that a church there exhibited every Friday 
the cloth in which Christ was buried, with the figure of his body. It is probable that this cloth and 
the TS are the same. It seems that the TS was among the spoils of the Crusades, together with many 
other relics brought back to Europe.  Before the  sacking of Constantinople in 1204 there are some 
documents that refer to the presence of the TS: for example some characteristics of the Christ 
reproduced in some Byzantine coins (gold-solidus) of the VII-XIII century A.D. are very similar to 
those of the TS body image. 

 I. Wilson 

(1998)

 

identified the TS, folded four times to show only the face, with the Mandylion, a 

cloth said to have received the miraculous imprint of Christ’s face and to have been taken to Edessa 
in the first century A.D.. The tradition of this imprint “made without hands” deve loped first in the 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

Byzantine empire; a similar tradition arose in the 7th and 8th centuries in the West  - that of 
Veronica, who wiped the brow of Christ with her veil and found an imprint of his face remaining. 

Scientific interest in the TS developed after 1898, when S. Pia, who photographed it for the first 

time, noticed that the negative image on the TS looked like a photographic positive. Correlations 
with the anatomical characteristics of a human body were also very high and  not comparable with 
anatomical characteristics normally depicted in popular Medieval art. In 1931, G. Enrie again 
photographed the TS at a very high resolution.  

The TS  has a front image 1.95 m long and a back image 2.02 m long, separated from the former 

by a non-image zone of 0.18 m (measurements done before 2002); the images show  an adult male, 
nude, well proportioned and muscular, with beard, mustache, and long hair.  

The TS has been radiocarbon-dated to 1260-1390 A.D. 

(Damon et al. 1989)

 but a great number of 

scientists believe that the method used to take the sample and the reliability of radiocarbon dating is 
not satisfactory because the linen underwent many vicissitudes (e.g., fires, restorations, water, 
exposure to candle smoke and the breath of visitors). For example, some researchers have proposed 
that the 1532 fire probably modified the quantity of radiocarbon in the TS, thus altering its dating, 
and others believe in the existence of a biological complex of fungi and bacteria covering the yarns 
of the TS in a patina  

(Moroni 1997, Garza Valdes 2001).

 Recently it was demonstrated that the 1988 sample 

is not representative of the whole TS 

(Adler 1999 and 2000, Marino 2000 and 2002, Rogers 2002 and 2005). 

Many hypotheses and experimental tests have been carried out on linen fabrics to explain the 

formation of the body image, both in favor of authenticity, and vice versa. Examples are: 

-a) The body image is caused by the emanation of ammoniacal vapors 

(Vignon 1902).

  

-b) The body image is due to a chemical process similar to that  which happens in leaves of 

herbaria: the image originated through direct contact 

(De Salvo 1982, Volckringer 1991)

-c) The body image is a painting

 (McCrone 1980). 

 

-d) The body image is due to a natural chemical reaction 

(Rogers 2002).

 

-e) The body image was obtained from a warmed bas-relief 

(Pesce Delfino 2001)

  

-f) The body image was obtained by rubbing a bas-relief with pigments or acids 

(Nickell 1997).

 

-g) The body image was obtained by a modified carbon dust drawing transferred to the cloth by 

rubbing 

(Craig and Bresee 1994).

 

-h) The body image was obtained by exposing linen in a “darkened room” using chemical agents 

available in the Middle Ages 

(Allen 1998, Picknett and Prince 1994). 

-i) The body image was obtained  by  exposing a linen cloth  to sunlight  with a glass plate 

containing an oil painted image on its surface 

(Wilson 2005). 

-l) The body image was obtained by surface electrostatic discharges caused by an electric field, 

of seismic origin or direcltly generated by the enveloped Man 

(Scheuermann 1987, De Liso 2000, 2002, 

Lattarulo 2003, Fanti 2005, Fanti et al. Sept 2005). 

-m) The body image is due to an energy source coming from the wrapped or enveloped Man, 

perhaps caused during the Resurrection 

(Lindner 2002, Rinaudo 1998, Jackson 1990, Moran 2002).

 

Although good experimental results have been obtained by a number of researchers, in the sense 

that, at first sight, the image, generally limited to the face, is similar to that of the TS Man, until 
now no experimental test has been able to reproduce all the  characteristics found in the image 
impressed on the TS. 

Some researchers interested in the TS scientific problems  formed the ShroudScience Group on 

Yahoo to discuss these issues  via the Internet. A first objective posed by them is that regarding the 
possible explanation of the body image formation. In order to deepen  the discussion in accordance 
with the Scientific Method, all the scientists agreed to define a list of evidences of the TS upon 
which to base their further debate. This paper, 

still in progress

, presents the list of evidences 

defined by the researchers, that are intended to be useful for future discussion.  
 

 
 
 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

2) LIST OF FACTS AND OBSERVATIONS  

 

The list is subdivided in four different types of evidences: 

Type A

 refers to unquestionable observations made on the TS numbered as â€œAn” where n is the 

evidence number;  

Type B

 refers to confirmed observations or conclusions based on a proof made in reference to 

TS studies and are numbered as “Bn”;             

Type C

 refers to facts or observations that were evidenced by some researchers but that are not 

universally accepted and are numbered as “Cn”;             

- Assuming a scenario that the TS is actually the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth it makes sense, 

to include the Scriptures in  this discussion, not on a theological level, but describing some 
things that might have an impact on the TS; for this reason 

Type D

 refers to correspondences 

with  those described in the holy texts and are numbered as “Dn”. 

 
 
2.1) Specific facts 
 

The list of 

Type A

 facts refers to unquestionable observations made on the TS and they are at the 

basis of every hypothesis formulation in the sense that an hypothesis must be tested against all Type 
A facts and only if it is congruent with all of them, none excluded, can  it be considered for further 
in depth study.  
 

2.1a) CHEMICAL-PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE LINEN YARNS AND FIBERS 

A1) The yarn used to weave the Shroud was spun with a "

Z twist

." 

(Raes 1974,  Vial 1989, Curto 1976, 

Pastore 1988).  

A2) Direct microscopy showed that the 

image color

 resides only on the 

topmost fibers

 at the 

highest parts of the weave 

(Evans 1978; Pellicori 1981).

  

A3) Phase-contrast photomicrographs show that there is a very thin coating on the outside of all 

superficial linen fibers  on Shroud samples  named  "

Ghost

";  â€œGhosts” are colored (carbohydrate) 

impurity layers pulled from a linen fiber by the adhesive of the sampling tape and they were found 
on background, light-scorch and image sticky tapes 

(Zugibe and Rogers 1978, Rogers 2002).

  

A4) Body image 

color

 resides on the 

thin impurity layer 

of outer surfaces of the fibers 

(Zugibe  1978, 

Heller 1981; Rogers 2002).  

A5) According to M. Evans (

1978

) photomicrographs 

(ME-02, -08, -14, -16, -18, -20, -25, -29),

 the color of the 

image-areas has a discontinuous distribution  along the yarn of the cloth: 

striations

 are evident. 

The image  has a distinct preference for running  along the individual fibers making up a yarn, 
coloring some but not others 

(Pellicori 1981, Schneider 2005).

 Fibers further from a flat surface, tangent to 

the fabric, are less colored, but a color concentration can be detected in correspondence to crevices 
where two or three yarns cross each other 

(ME-20) (Fanti 2005).

  

A6) The cellulose of the 

medullas

 of the 10-20-micrometer-diameter fibers in image areas is 

colorless

 because the  colored layer on image fibers can be  stripped off, leaving colorless linen 

fibers 

(Heller 1981; Rogers 2002). 

 

A7) The 

colored layers

 in the adhesive have the same chemical properties as the 

image

 color on 

fibers 

(Rogers 2005).

 

A8) The 

crystal structure

 of the cellulose of image fibers has 

not visibly changed

 with respect to 

that of the non- image fibers (scorches have) 

(Rogers 2002; Feller 1994).

 

A9) The colored coating cannot be dissolved, bleached, or changed by standard chemical agents, 

but it  can be 

decolorized

 by reduction with 

diimide

 (hydrazine/hydrogen peroxide in boiling 

pyridine); the residue from reduction is colorless linen fibers 

(Heller  1981, Rogers 2003).     

A10)  The pyrolysis/ms data showed the presence of 

polysaccharides of lower stability

 than 

cellulose on the surface of linen fibers from the TS 

(Rogers 2004).

 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

A11) Photomicrographs and samples show that the image is a result of 

concentrations of yellow to 

light brown fibers  

(Pellicori 1981; Jumper  1984; McCrone and Skirius 1980; Schwalbe 1982; Rogers 2002).

  

A12) The image- formation mechanism 

did not char the blood

 

(Rogers 1978-1981).

   

A13) The image formed at a relatively 

low temperature

 

(Rogers 1978-1981).

 

A14) The 1978 quantitative 

x-ray-fluorescence-spectrometry analysis

 detected significant 

uniform amounts of 

calcium and strontium

 concentrations (a normal impurity in calcium 

minerals), and 

iron

 in the Shroud 

(Morris 1980, Rogers 2003, Adler 1998).

 

A15) Microchemical tests with iodine  and pyrolysis/mass spectrometry  detected the presence of 

starch impurities

 on the surfaces of linen fibers from the TS 

(Rogers 2002, 2004). 

A16) The 

lignin

 that can be seen at the wall thickenings and/or  growth nodes of the linen fibers of 

the TS does 

not

 give the standard 

test for vanillin 

(Rogers 2002, 2005).

  

A17) There is 

no cementation

 signs among the image fibers 

(Pellicori 1981). 

 

A18) 

No painting pigments or media scorched

 in image areas, or were rendered water soluble at 

the time of the AD 1532 fire 

(Rogers 1977-1978-1981/2002; Schwalbe 1982).

  

A19) 

No fluorescent pyrolysis products

 were found in image areas 

(Rogers 2002).

 

A20) After weaving, the TS yarns were 

washed

 with a very mild, natural material because of the 

presence of 

flax wax

 on the fibers and the specular reflectance of the non- image fibers  

(Rogers 

2003). 

 

2.1b) OPTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CLOTH 

A21) The cloth shows 

bands 

of slightly different colors of yarn that are best observed in ultraviolet 

photographs.  For example  between face and  hair there are two non-colored bands that continue 
along the warp direction 

(Miller and Pellicori, 1981, Fanti 2003, Rogers 2002, 2005).

  

A22) There is a 

correspondence

 (even if not complete) between cloth 

bands 

of slightly different 

colors of yarn of the front and 

back surface

 

(G. Ghiberti 2002; Fanti 2003).

 

A23) The colored fibers in non- image (background) areas show the 

same type of superficial color

 

as  body  image fibers, their spectra are the same, and the cellulose in them is not colored 

(Gilbert 

1980; Rogers 2002). 

A24) The body 

image does not fluoresce

 in the visible under ultraviolet illumination 

(Gilbert 1980, 

Pellicori 1981).

 

A25) The 

non-image

 area 

fluoresces

 with a maximum at about 435 nanometers 

(Pellicori 1981).

   

A26) A 

redder fluorescence

 can be observed around the 

burn holes

 from the AD 1532 fire 

(Pellicori 

1981).

 

A27)  The cloth does 

not

 show any 

phosphorescence

 

(Rogers 2005).

 

A28) All the chemical and microscopic 

properties

 of 

dorsal and ventral

 image fibers are 

identical 

(Jumper 1984).

 

A29) An emission 

image 

was

 

clearly 

visible in the 8-14 micrometers  infrared

 range 

(Accetta 1980).

 

A30) 

IR emission

 of the image at a uniform 

room temperature

, and in the 

3-5-micrometer range

 

was 

below

 the instrument 

sensitivity

 

(Accetta 1980).

 

 
 

2.1c) BODY IMAGE 

A31) The body image is 

very faint

: reflected optical densities are typically less than 0.1 in the 

visible range 

(Jumper 1984; Schwalbe 1981).

 

A32) The body image shows 

no evidence of image saturation

 

(Jackson 1977, 1982, 1984). 

 

A33) The  body image has a 

resolution of  4,9±0,5 mm at the 5% MTF value

  (for example the 

lips); the resolution of the bloodstains is at least ten times better (for example the scratches in the 
scourge wounds) 

(Jackson 1982, 1984; Moran 2002; Rogers 2003, Fanti 2004-MTF, Fanti Sept. 2005-MTF). 

 

A34) The body image  

does not have well defined contours

 

(Jackson 1982, 1984; Moran 2002).  

A35) A 

non-image area

 is detectable among the 

fingers

 of the TS image 

(Fanti 2004).

  

A36) There is a 

darker spot

 in correspondence of the palm of the Man’s hand near the index finger 

(Accetta 2001, Antonacci 2000).

 

A37) The 

thumbs

 are not visible in the hand image 

(

Bucklin 1982, Ricci 1989).

   

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

A38) In correspondence to the 

middle of the nose

 there is a 

swelling

 

(Fanti 2004).

 

A39) Detailed photographs and microscopic studies of the cloth in the nose image area show 

scratches and dirt

 

(Bucklin 1982).

 

A40) The 

hair

 on the frontal image show 

high luminance level

s relatively to the face: for example 

the left hair is darker than the cheeks 

(Fanti 2004).

 

A41) There is 

no

 evidence of 

image

 

between

 the tops of the front and dorsal 

heads

 

(Adler 1999; Moran 

2002).   

A42) In the positive photograph of Durante (2000), the 

luminance levels

 of the front and back body 

images (face excluded) are 

compatible

 within an uncertainty of 5%; the front image is generally 

darker than the dorsal one 

(Moran 2002, Fanti 2005).

 

 

A43) The image of the 

dorsal side

 of the body  does 

not penetrate the cloth

 any more deeply than 

the image of the ventral side of the body 

((Jumper 1984, Rogers 2005). 

A44) The 

luminance level of the head

 image in the positive photograph of Durante (2000) is 10% 

and more lower (

darker

) than that of the whole body image 

(Moran 2002). 

A45) The 

image-forming mechanism

 operated regardless of different  body structures such as skin, 

hair, beard and perhaps nail 

(Antonacci 2000).

 

A46) The 

thermograms

 did not show the lower 

jaw

 of the image 

(Rogers 2003), 

even if it is visible 

(Whanger 1998).

   

A47) A body image 

color

 is visible on the 

back surface

 of the cloth in the same position of some 

anatomic details as for the body image of the frontal surface of the TS.  The 

hair

 appears more 

easily to the naked eye 

(Ghiberti 2002) 

but also other details of face and perhaps hands  appear  b y 

image enhancement 

(Maggiolo 2002/03, Fanti and Maggiolo 2004).

  

A48) 

No image

 color is visible on the 

back surface

 in correspondence of the 

dorsal

 image 

(Ghiberti 

2002; Maggiolo 2002/03, Fanti and Maggiolo 2004).

   

A49)  The nose image on the back surface of the TS presents the same  extension of both nostrils, 

unlike the 

frontal

, in which the 

right nostril

 is less evident 

(Fanti and Maggiolo 2004).

 

A50) Image details corresponding to  Face 

grooves

 are  more faintly  represented (e.g. eye sockets 

and skin around the nose), convex “

hills

”  on the Face (e.g. eyeballs and nose tip ) however are 

more clearly represented 

(Scheuermann 1983).

  

A51) Although anatomical details are generally in close agreement with standard human-body 

measurements, some measurements made on the Shroud image, such as 

hands, calves and torso

do not agree with anthropological standards

 

(Ercoline 1982; Simionato 1998/99; Fanti and Faraon 2000; Fanti 

and Marinelli 2001). 

A52) The body image shows 

no

 evidence

s

 of 

putrefaction

 signs, in particular around the lips. 

There is no evidence for tissue breakdown (formation of liquid decomposition products of a body)  

(Bucklin 1982; Moran 2002).

 

A53) 

No image formed under the blood stains 

(Heller 1981; Schwalbe 1982; Brillante 2002).   

A54) The front image shows 

hair

 that 

goes down to the shoulders  

(Fanti and Faraon 2000).

 

A55) The image of the TS Man, appears as if he was 

scourged

 

(

Bucklin 1982, Ricci 1989).

  

A56) The image of the TS Man, appears as if he was 

crucified: 

it appears with nail holes and 

corresponding blood at the wrists and top of the feet 

(

Bucklin 1982, Ricci 1989).

 

A57) The image of the TS Man demonstrates no evidence of 

maiming

 or disfigurement 

(

Bucklin 1982, 

Ricci 1989). 

 

2.1d) BLOOD AND BODY FLUIDS 

A58) 

Body fluids

 other blood or serum than did not percolate into the cloth 

(Rogers 2003). 

A59) The blood or serum have migrated by 

capillary imbibitions

 from the "warp side" to the "weft 

side" of the TS and, depending on their abundance and consistency, they filled the mesh apertures 

(Fanti 2004).

 

A60) There is a class of particles on the TS ranging in color from red to orange that test as blood 

derived residues. They test positively for the presence of protein, hemin, 

bilirubin

, and albumin; 

give positive hemochromagen and cyanmethemoglobin responses; after chemical generation 
display the characteristic fluorescence of 

porphyrins 

(Adler 1999).

 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

A61)  The blood on the TS is 

not denatured

. Therefore both the  image- formation mechanism and 

the 1532 fire did not involve processes that would denature the blood 

(Rogers 2004). 

A62) The 

blood

 from the large flow on the back 

darkened

 (scorched) at an adjoining 

scorch 

(Rogers 

1978).

  

A63) The 

red flecks

 McCrone 

(1980, 2000)

 claimed were hematite had an 

organic matrix

 

(Heller 1983, 

Rogers 2004).   

A64) Microscopic observation of 

blood flecks

 of sample 3EB showed specular reflection: 

the 

blood went onto the surface as a liquid

 

(Rogers 1978).

 

A65) 

Blood

 spots are much 

more

 

visible on the TS by transmitted light

 than by reflected light; 

this implies that the blood saturated the cloth and it is not a superficial image as the body image

r

 is 

(Rogers 1978). 

A66) Many 

blood traces

 visible on the frontal image are also visible 

on the back

 image in the 

same position

 

(Fanti 2003).

 

A67)

 Blood

 

stains

 are well marked on the 

reverse side

, although  they are fainter than on the front 

side of TS 

(Fanti 2003, Whanger 2004).

   

A68) Some human 

blood

 stains appear on and 

outside of the body image 

(left elbow) 

(Heller 1980, 

1981, Baima Bollone 1981, 1982, Jackson, 1987, Carreira, 1998). 

A69) In correspondence  to  the 

knees

 on the dorsal image, there are scourge marks in 

correspondence to 

lower luminance levels

 of the body image 

(Fanti 2003).

 

A70) The 

blood 

on the TS

 does not fluoresce

 in ultraviolet illumination (no porphyria and no 

fluorescent pigments) 

(Rogers 1978).

 

A71) The 

blood

 on the TS

 

can be removed with a 

proteolytic enzyme 

(Adler 1999).

 

A72) 

No smears

 are evident in the blood traces 

(Bucklin 1982, Ricci 1989, Antonacci 2000).

 

A73) 

No potassium

 signals could be found in any of the blood area data 

(Morris 1980).

  

A74) In UV fluorescence the 

scourge

 marks appear with 

dumbbell shapes 

(Bucklin 1982, Ricci 1989).  

A75) In UV fluorescence the 

scourges

 are resolved into 

fine scratches

: three, and in some cases 

four, parallel scratches can be distinguished 

(Bucklin 1982, Ricci 1989).

     

A76) The blood stain corresponding to the right side of the 

chest

 6th ribs shows 

separation of 

blood

 from a clearer liquid material 

(Bucklin 1982).

 

A77) The 

DNA

 found in blood spots is badly 

degraded. 

(Rogers 2005).

   

A78) 

No broken fibers

 were found under the blood clots 

(N. Svensson 2005). 

  

2.1e) OTHER 

A79) 

Earthy material

 (limestone composed  of aragonite with strontium and iron) was found on 

the 

feet

 of TS Man 

(Kohlbeck 1986, Nitowski 1986, 1998, Antonacci 2000).

 Earthy  material  was also  found in 

correspondence with the 

nose

 and the 

left knee

 

(Pellicori 1981).

  

A80) Drops of 

wax

 were found 

(Maloney 1989). 

A81) Microscopic observation of the bridge of the 

nose

 showed discontinuous distribution of 

light 

gold-colored fibers

.  All were on the top of the yarn 

(Rogers 1978, 2004).

 

A82) There is 

no

 observed microscopic, chemical, or spectroscopic evidence for the presence of 

any 

dry powder

 responsible for the body image on the TS 

(Adler 1999).

 

A83) Some little 

black spots 

(diameter of 1-2 mm) appear out of the body image (for example near 

the head, between the hair and the water stain); they are also visible, in the same position, on the 
back surface of the TS 

(Maggiolo 2002/03, Fanti 2003, Rogers 2003).

  

A84) Large 

water stains

 are visible on both sides of the cloth 

(Fanti 2004).

 

 

A85) 

Silver

 traces were found around the burn holes in the scorch area of the TS 

(Heller 1983).

 

A86) The white cloth used to cover the display board for the showing (1978) was fluorescent.  Rudy 

Dichtel reported many intensely 

fluorescent short fibers on the surface of the Shroud

 

(Rogers 

2004). 

A87) 

Aldehyde and carboxylic acid functional

 

groups were detected

 in the TS fibers 

 

(Adler 1981).  

 
 
 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

 

2.2) Confirmed observations  
 
Type B

 refers to confirmed observations

 

or conclusions based on a proof made in reference to  the 

TS. Therefore these observations must also be used to test any new hypothesis. 

 

2.2a) CHEMICAL-PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE LINEN YARNS AND FIBERS  

B1) The TS samples examined have 

herringbone 3:1

 twill weave 

(Vial 1989).

 

 

B2) 

Traditional dimensions

 of the TS of 436 x 110 cm 

(Baima Bollone 1978)

 are changed after 2002 

“restoration”: one side (the lower considering horizontal the body image, with the frontal side on 
the left) measured 437.7 cm in 2000 and 441.5 cm in 2002; the opposite side measured 434.5 in 
2000 and 442.5 in 2002; its height of 112.5 and 113 cm  respectively on the left and on the right in 
2000 but 113.0 and 113.7 cm in 2002 

(Ghiberti 2002).

 A measurement made in 1868 by Gastaldi 

(Baima Bollone  1978)

 reports the following dimensions: 410 x 140 cm 

(Scarpelli 1983). 

B3) The 

thickness

 of the cloth measured by Jackson with a  micrometer is variable from 318 to 391 

micrometers 

(Rogers 2004).

 

B4) There appears to be more variation in the 

diameter

 of warp yarns than weft Rogers 

(1978).

 

B5) The TS weave is 

very tight

 

(Raes 1974, Rogers 1978, Vial 1989).

 

B6) Although yarns and design of Raes sample look  like the main part of the cloth, linen fibers 

from the 

Raes sample

 that was cut in 1973 are chemically 

different

 (from  reflected spectroscopy 

and chemical analysis ) 

(Adler 2000, Rogers 2002).

  

B7) 

Cotton

 fibers were found in the  Raes  samples and they were identified as Gossypium 

herbaceum, a common Middle East variety 

(Raes 1974, 1991).

 

B8) The 

sewing

 connecting the upper linen 

band

  of the TS is very particular and typical of very 

old manufacture 

(Flury Lemberg 2000, 2001).

  

B9) Reflectance spectra, chemical tests, laser- microprobe Raman spectra, pyrolysis mass 

spectrometry, and x-ray fluorescence all show that the image is 

not painted

 with any of the 

expected, historically-documented pigments 

(Schwalbe 1982; Morris 1980; Heller 1981, Mottern 1979).  

B10) Chemical tests showed that there is 

no protein painting medium

 or protein-containing 

coating in image areas  

(Rogers 1978-1981; Heller 1981; Pellicori 1980, 1981; Gilbert 1980; Accetta 1980; Miller  1981).

 

B11) The image fibers do 

not

 show any sign of 

capillary

 flow of a colored or reactive liquid (

Evans 

1978; Pellicori 1981

). 

B12) Flakes of image color can be seen in other places where they fell off and stuck to the adhesive. 

The chemical

 properties of the coatings 

are the

 same

 as the image color on image fibers. All of 

the color is on the surfaces of the fibers (

Rogers 2002; Heller 1981

). 

B13) There are 

no pigments

 on the body image in a sufficient quantity to explain the presence of an 

image 

(Pellicori 1981). 

 

 

2.2b) OPTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CLOTH 

B14)  The TS linen has a 

lustrous

 finish 

(Rogers, 1978-1981). 

B15)  If a fiber is colored,  it is 

uniformly colored 

around its cylindrical surface 

(Adler 1996, 1999)

relatively long fibers show variation in color from non-image to image area 

(Fanti 2004).

 

B16) 

Crease

 below the 

chin

 of the image: on the frontal surface of the TS, the inside part of 

crease

 

has a lighter color similar to the background, but it has darker margins similar to the image-color.  
On the back of the cloth, the same crease is darker in correspondence of the lighter color of the 
frontal surface and the margins are confused with the background: the darker margins are of the 
same straw-yellow color of the body image 

(Rogers 2004).

   

B17) In the 

ultraviolet

 emission and absorption photographs the 

background

 cloth shows a light 

greenish yellow

 emission 

(Adler 2002).

  

B18) Where one of the 

image-yarn crosses over another

, there is often 

no color

 on the lower one 

(Heller 1983, Rogers 2005).

 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

B19) The image of the 

dorsal side

 of the body shows fairly the 

same color

 density and distribution 

as the ventral 

(Jumper 1984).

 

B20) 

IR photograph

 of the face made by Judica Cordiglia, if compared with visible photographs of 

the face indicates the 

low absorption near the IR

 of the products of image formation 

(Judica 

Cordiglia 1974, Accetta 1980, Rogers 2003).  

 

 

2.2c) BODY IMAGE 

B21) Up to now,  all the 

attempts  to reproduce a copy of the TS

 similar in all the detected 

characteristics has 

failed

 

(Carreira 1998, Fanti 2004).

  

B22) The 

most of the prominent parts 

in the vertical direction (nose, beard, sole, calf) of the body 

image 

are marked

 

(Fanti 2003).

 

B23) The 

hair

 on the front image is 

soft

 and not matted as would be expected if it were soaked with 

a liquid 

(Fanti 2004).

 

B24) When their lengths are measured, the 

dorsal image is longer

 than the ventral image  in a 

manner similar  to the imprint on  a sheet of a man having the head tilted forwards, his knees 
slightly bent, and his feet extended 

(Craig 2003; Cagnazzo 1997-98; Fanti 2000).

 

B25) The 

frontal body image

 (195 cm long) is 

compatible

, within an uncertainty of +/-2 cm, with 

the 

dorsal

 image (202 m long) if  it is supposed that the TS enveloped a corpse having the  head 

tilted forward, the knees partially bent and the feet stretched  forwards and downwards 

(Basso 2000).

 

B26) Based on cloth measurements 

(Baima Bollone 1978),  

the image corresponds to 

a man 175+/-2 cm 

tall

 

(Simionato 1998-99; Faraon 1998-1999; Basso  2000).

  

B27)  The body image has the 

normal tones of light and dark reversed 

with respect to a 

photograph, such that  parts nearer to the cloth are darker 

(Jumper 1984, Craig 2004, Schneider 2004). 

B28) The luminance distribution of both the frontal and dorsal images has been correlated to the 

clearances between a 

three-dimensional

 surface of the body and a covering cloth 

(Quidor 1913, 

Sullivan 1973, Gastineau 1974, Jackson 1977, 1982, 1984, Fanti 2001, Moran 2002).

 

B29) The luminance distribution of the body image can be correlated with a 

highly directional 

mapping function

 

(Jackson 1977, 1982, 1984). 

B30) The body image shows 

non-directional light sources

 in the sense that there are no shadows, 

cast shadows, highlights, and reflected lights in or on the body image 

(Moran 2002; Craig 2003). 

B31) The absence of saturation implies that the 

image formation did not “go to completion”,

 i.e. 

it did not produce the maximum number of conjugated carbon-carbon double bonds

 (Rogers 2003, 

Gilbert a1980: fig. 8 and 10).

 

B32) In correspondence of image sections of cylindrical elements such as legs, the 

luminance 

levels variation

 approximates a 

sinusoidal law

 

(Fanti 2004).

 

B33) In reference to a cloth wrapping a body, there is 

no 

evidence of  body 

image

 formation at the 

sides

 of the body on both the frontal and dorsal TS images 

(Adler 1999; Moran 2002).

  

B34) The 

Fourier transform

 of the body image shows a nearly  continuous spectrum in 

correspondence  to the spatial frequencies up to 100 [1/m] 

(Fanti 1999; Maggiolo 2002/03).   

B35) The body image indicates the 

absence of brush strokes

 

(Lorre 1977).

 

B36) The frontal image, at least in correspondence  to the  head, is 

doubly superficial 

(Fanti and 

Maggiolo 2004).

  

B37) The 

fingers

 in the image appear to be 

longer

 than average for a man, but they are still within 

the normal range (Gaussian distribution) 

(Heller 1983, Whanger 2005).

 

B38) 

Image distortions 

of hands, calves and torso on the TS of are very close to those obtained by 

a man enveloped on a sheet 

(Ercoline 1982; Simionato 1998/99; Fanti and Faraon 2000; Fanti 2001).

 

B39) The very 

high rigidity of the body

 is evident on the back image especially in correspondence 

of the buttocks: the anatomical contours of the back image demonstrate minimal surface flattening 

(Bucklin 1982; Basso 2000).

 

B40) The image of the TS Man

,

 shows the effects (wounds) of many 

pointed objects

 

(

Bucklin 1982, 

Ricci 1989).

   

B41) The 

tibio-femural anthropometric index

 of the image of the TS Man is 83% 

(Fanti 1999).

 

B42) 

No broken bones

 are evident on the body image 

(

Bucklin 1982, Ricci 1989).

 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

10 

B43) There is a 

swelling

 on the 

face

 over the right cheek 

(Bucklin 1982).

 

B44) There is a slight 

deviation of the nose

 and at the tip of the nose is an area of discoloration 

(Bucklin 1982).

 

B45) A 

body image

 is visible in  areas  of body-sheet 

non-contact zones,

 such  as  those between 

nose and cheek 

(Fanti 2004).

 

 

2.2d) BLOOD AND BODY FLUIDS 

B46) There is  a first 

type of blood

 stain that corresponds to the blood 

exudated

 

from clotted 

wounds 

and

 

transferred to the cloth by being in contact with a wounded human body such as 

scourging and crown of thorns wounds or wrists wounds 

(Adler 1999).

   

B47) There is a second 

type of blood

 stain that correspond s to the blood that directly 

flowed

 on the 

TS  such as feet wounds or side wound with blood separation in a dense and a serous portion 

(Brillante 2002, Schneider 2004).

 

B48) The UV photographs of single blood stains show a distinct 

serum clot retraction ring

 

(Adler 

1999).

 

B49) The chemical and physical parameters of the 

blood stains

 

are different

  than  mineral 

compositions proposed by 

artists

 

(Adler 1999).

 

B50)  The bloodstains observable on the back surface  have  been described as "

imbibed flows

throughout the cloth 

(Ghiberti 2002). 

 

B51) Blood traces on the back surface of the TS are smaller in size  when  compared with the 

corresponding  traces  on the frontal side,  showing that 

blood was transposed

 onto the cloth 

touching the frontal 

side of the TS

 

(Fanti 2003).

 

B52)   The maintenance of the 

red  bright color 

of the TS

 blood

  with time was observed, but the 

explanation of why the color is so red is not definitive 

(Brillante 2002).

   

B53)  There are 

blood traces

 

not consistent

 with scalp hair traces soaked  with blood  in 

correspondence to the image of the 

hair

 on the front side 

(Lavoie 1983, Fanti 1999).

 

B54) The 

wrist wound position

 can be referred to as the hand nail used for the crucifixion 

(Fanti and 

Marinelli 2003).  

B55) The 

blood clots

 were transposed to the linen fabric during 

fibrinolysis

 

(Brillante 1983; Lavoie 1983

).  

The process of fibrinolysis could cause clots to liquefy sufficiently for the blood to transfer to the 
cloth as a serous- laden liquid rather than a moist jelly- like substance 

(Craig 2004).

  

B56) Some blood stains are comparable to transfers that would be expected if  the arms were posed 

in 

non horizontal position

 

(Lavoie 1983, 2003, Fanti 2005, Schwortz 2005).  

 

2.2e) OTHER 

B57) The 

limestone

 found on the feet  contains calcium in the form of 

aragonite

. Similar 

characteristics  were found on samples coming from Ecole Biblique tomb in Jerusalem 

(Levi-Setti 

1985, Antonacci 2000).

 

B58) It is 

unknown

 whether 

Saponaria officinalis

 can be detected on the Shroud 

(Rogers 2003; Jumper 

1984 ; Gilbert 1980). 

B59) 

Rust stains

 due to thumb tacks were found on the sides of the TS 

(Faraon 1998/99, Schwortz 2003).  

B60) Characteristics of the TS face and right foot are close to those found on some  

Byzantine 

coins

 (gold-solidus) of the VII-XIII century A.D. 

(Moroni 1986). 

B61) Some 

water stains

 are older than the 1532 fire because they  indicate a 

different folding

 of 

the TS 

(Guerreschi and Salcito 2002). 

 

 

2.3) Evidences to be confirmed 
 

Seeing things and not seeing things, is perhaps the biggest problem in legitimate Shroud research. 

"I think I see"

 and "I don't see" seems to be the underpinning of many “scientific” analyses.  The 

body image on the Shroud was formed by some process. We don't know, for now, what that was, 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

11 

nor the shape of the cloth, nor the environment where the  body was positioned: we can only 
suppose what that might have been; we don't know many variables.  

Our brain-eyes system may plays tricks on the researcher. Because of a priori assumptions, it may 

be that he perceives things  that conform to something searched for and conversely, he may  fail to 
perceive images because of not knowing what various objects look like. Many of the images are 
below ordinary human perceptual threshold,  therefore anything must be probed for documentable 
facts, including using  image enhancement techniques.  

Type C

 refers to facts that were evidenced by some researchers but that are not universally 

accepted; therefore they can help in formulating new hypotheses, they can not be used to test a new 
hypothesis. 

 
2.3a) BODY IMAGE 

C1) The chiaroscuro effect is caused by a different number of yellowed fibers per unit of surface, so 

that this is an image with ‘

areal’

 

density 

(Moran 2002, Fanti and Marinelli 2003).

 

C2) Body image characteristics can be referred to the hypothesized effect of a  man became 

mechanically transparent

 that radiated a burst of energy 

(Jackson 1977, 1984, 1990).

 

C3) The TS face shows a sad but majestic 

serenity 

(Moroni 1997).

 

 

2.3b) OTHER 

C4) 

Pollen grains

 relative to the zones of Palestine, Edessa, Constantinople  and  Europe were 

found 

(Frei 1979, 1983; Danin 1999).

  

C5) 

Pollen

 

grains

 with 

incrustations

 soluble in water were found from the vacuumed samples 

taken  from the back surface of the cloth 

(Riggi 2003).

  

C6) The wrapped or enveloped body was a 

corpse

 

(Bucklin 1982, Lavoie 1983,  Jackson 1998, Petrosillo 1988, 

Brillante 2002, Baima Bollone 2000, Fanti 2003, Zugibe 2005), 

but

 

someone still states that the body was in a state 

of 

coma

 (

Bonte 1992, Hoare 1994, Gruber 1998, Kuhnke 2004, Felzmann 2005

). 

C7) The human blood is of 

AB group 

(Baima Bollone 1981, 1982). 

C8) The 

radiocarbon dating

 of 1988 states that the TS linen has an age of  1260-1390 

(Damon et al. 

1989). 

C9) â€œPreliminary estimates of the kinetics constants for the loss of 

vanillin

 from lignin indicate a 

much older age for the cloth than the radiocarbon analyses” 

(Rogers 2005)

C10) There is the image of an identified 

coin

 (dilepton lituus) on the right eye 

(Filas 1982; Haralick 1983;  

Barbesino 1997)

C11) There is an image of another identifiable 

coin

  (Pilate lepton simpulum) over the 

left

  eye  

(Balossino 1997; Barbesino 1997).

 

C12) The TS is like a 

funerary sheet 

(Persili 1998)

C13)  There are some 

analogies

 between the TS and the 

Oviedo Sudarium

, including many 

congruent blood stains 

(Whanger 1996)

". 

C14) There are various 

writings

 around the Face 

(Marion 1998).

 

C15) There are many identified 

floral images

 on  the TS, which indicate that the Shroud originated 

in the vicinity of  Jerusalem in the spring of the year, and which have the appearance  expected from 
corona discharge. Some images are consistent with the 

fruits

 of pistacia plants, which were used as 

burial spices 

(Danin, 1999; Whanger, 2000)

C16) 

Human DNA 

comes

 

from Riggi’s blood samples from the TS, this because three gene 

segments were cloned and studied 

(Garza Valdes 2001).

 

C17) Results  from the 

DNA

 analysis, made from the TS blood at  the  University of Texas, 

S.Antonio, U.S.A.,  indicate that some genetic characteristics are relative to the 

Semitic

 race (for 

example hair) 

(Riggi 2003).

 

C18) The TS Man died because of an 

infarct

 followed by 

hemopericardium

 

(Malantrucco 1992).

 

C19) Some 

teeth

 are visible on the image 

(Whanger 2000, Accetta 2001).

 

C20) The 

skull

 is visible on the TS 

(Whanger 2000).

 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

12 

C21) Images of the 

bones

 of the fingers, of the palms (metacarpals) and of the wrist are visible, and 

in particular a hidden thumb 

(Whanger 2000, Accetta 2001). 

C22) A 

sponge

 is visible on the TS 

(Whanger 2000).

 

C24) A large 

nail

 with two crossed smaller nails are visible on the TS 

(Whanger 2000). 

 

C25) A 

shaft

 and head of spear are visible on the TS 

(Whanger 2000).

 

C26) A 

crown

 of thorns with stalks and flowers is visible on the TS 

(Whanger 2000).

 

C27) Some 

bloodstains

 such as those on the arms and the “reverse-3” on the forehead present a 

discontinuity

 in which a more attenuate  region is evident

 (Jackson 1987, Schneider 2004). 

 

C28) Several wood tubules were found from an 

oak

 from Riggi’s samples 

(Garza Valdes 2001).

 

C29) A 

bioplastic coating

 was found around the TS linen fibers 

(Garza Valdes 2001).

 

C30) Traces of 

saliva

 are visible on the image 

(Scheuermann 1983). 

 

C31) Traces of 

tears

  may be visible on the body image under the right eye 

(Guerreschi 2000).

 

C32) An 

ecchymosis

, on the left shoulder-blade level, and a wound on the right shoulder that added 

to the wounds of the scourge are evident; in such areas the wounds caused by the scourge appear 
enlarged probably by the pressure of the 

patibulum

 

(Ricci 1989).

  

C33)  Some 

early paintings

 of Jesus (before the VI century A.D. ) in Rome  have been produced 

independently from the  TS but have a significant similarity to the image on the  TS. If it is 
assumed that these paintings go back to people, who have known Jesus personally and knew 
therefore, how he has looked like. The significant similarities to the image on the TS indicates that 
both types of images go back to the same source: the historical Jesus 

(Felzmann 2003-2005).

 

C34) 

Natron

 (sodium carbonate) was found in the dusts aspired from the back surface of the TS 

(Riggi 1982).

 

C35) 

Aloe and myrrh

 were found by microscopic analysis

 (Baima Bollone 1983 and Nitowski 1986) but not by 

Heller (1983) and Rogers 2003).

 

C36) The 

scourge marks

 

are part of the image

 and primarily not caused from blood coming out 

of the wounds (

Hoare 1994

). 

C37) A 

ponytail

 is visible on the back image 

(Fanti and Marinelli 2001, fig. 12 B and C, Antonacci 2000, fig 3). 

C38) In the image of 

the back of the head

 some 

blood stains

  are partially 

masked

 

(Scheuermann 

1984). 

C39) Some blood stains are comparable to transfers that would be expected if a person was posed in 

the 

vertical position

 

(Lavoie 1983, 2003). 

 

 
2.3) Analogies between the TS Man and Christ, from the Old and the New Testament

 

 

It  is  hypothesized by many researchers that  the TS is the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth. The 

following list presents passages  in the Scriptures that have an impact on the TS. If  these Scriptures 
are accepted as an historic document, 

Type D

 facts can be useful to verify the proposed hypotheses.  

 
D1) “And no sign shall be given to it except the sign of the  prophet 

Jonah

.” 

(Mat 16:4).

 â€œAnd all flesh 

shall see the salvation of God.” 

(Luk 3:6).

 â€œAnd I am with you always, even to the end of the age â€ 

(Mat 28:20).

 The TS shows a sign promised by Jesus: like Jonah “who remained for three days in the 

stomach of the big fish”, the  Man of the TS remained for three days inside the sepulcher 

(Rodante 

1987).

 

D2) “A woman came to him with an alabaster jar of very expensive perfume, which she poured on 

his head as he was reclining at the table.” 

(Mat  26:7);

 â€œWhen she poured this 

perfume

 on my body, 

she did it to prepare me for burial.” 

(Mat  26:12).

 Less than 48 hours before his crucifixion, the hair of 

Jesus was anointed with a very valuable oil and this fact must be considered for an hypothesis 
about the TS image formatio n 

(Scheuermann 1984).

 

D3) “Then Pilate took Jesus and 

scourged

 Him.” 

(Joh 19:1). 

“I offered my back to those who beat Me, 

/my cheeks to those who pulled out my beard; /I did not hide my face /from mocking and spitting” 

(Isa 50:6). 

The whole body of the MTS is cruelly scourged, except for the breast where, hitting, one 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

13 

could cause death. The scourging was given like punishment  apart, more abundant (120 strokes) 
than the normal  (39 strokes) as a prelude to crucifixion 

(Zaninotto 1984). 

 

D4) “Then they 

struck

 Him on the head with a reed and spat on Him” 

(Mar 15:19).

 â€œAnd they struck 

Him with their hands” 

(Joh 19:3).

 The TS Man was hit on his face: for instance various tumefactions 

and the breakage of the nasal septum are evident

 

(Fanti and Marinelli 1998).

 

D5) “And the soldiers twisted a 

crown of thorns

 and put it on His head” 

(Joh 19:2).

 â€œWhen they had 

twisted a crown of thorns, they put it on His head” 

(Mat 27:29 etc).

 The TS Man was crowned with 

thorns. The head presents many wounds  caused by sharp bodies 

(Fanti and Marinelli 1998). 

D6) “And He, 

bearing His cross

, went out to
 (the) Golgotha â€ 

(Joh 19:17). 

The TS Man presents on 

the shoulders excoriations imputable to the transport of the horizontal part of the cross (patibulum) 

(Ricci 1989).

  

D7)

 

“Now as they came out, they found a man of 

Cyrene

, Simon by name. Him they compelled to 

bear His cross” 

(Mat 27:32).

 The TS Man fell repeatedly to the ground; this is demonstrated by the 

dust particles on the nose and on the left knee. Likely he was helped in the transport of the cross 

(Fanti and Marinelli 1998).

 

 

D8) “My throat is 

dry

” 

(Psa 69:3),

 â€œAnd for my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink â€ 

(Psa 69:21).

 From 

the forensic medicine analysis it results that the MTS died dehydrated 

(Intrigillo 1998).

 

D9) “Where (on the Golgotha) they 

crucified

 Him” (Joh 19:17). “They pierced My hands and My 

feet. I can count all My bones” 

(Psa 22:16-17)

 â€œYou have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and 

put to death” 

(Act 2:23). 

The TS Man too was crucified 

(Fanti and Marinelli 1998).

 

D10) “Reproach has 

broken my heart

” 

(Psa 69,20).

  "And Jesus 

cried out

 again with a loud voice, 

and yielded up His spirit” 

(Mat 27:50) 

“Because for Your sake I have borne reproach; Shame has 

covered my face” 

(Psa 69:8).

  â€œMy heart is like wax; It has  melted within Me” 

(Psa 22:14).

 The 

hemopericardium, diagnosed to the TS Man like consequence of the infarct, causes a violent 
dilatation of the pericardic pleura with consequent shooting pain from the back breast-bone and 
immediate death 

(Malantrucco 1992).  

 

 D11) "And saw that He was already dead, they 

did not break His legs

(Joh 19:33).”

Nor shall you 

break one of its bones” 

(Exo 12,46).

 Contrary to  many Roman crucifixions, they didn’t break the TS 

Man legs 

(Fanti and Marinelli 1998).

  

D12) 

“

But one of the soldiers 

pierced His side

 with a spear” 

(Joh 19:34),  

“But He was wounded for 

our transgressions â€ 

(Isa 53,5).

  â€œthen they will look on Me whom they pierced” 

(Zec 12:10).

 The TS 

Man too was pierced  in the side after his death 

(Zaninotto 1989). 

D13) “And  immediately 

blood and water came out

” 

(Joh 19:34).

 â€œFlowing from under the threshold 

of the temple toward the east, for the front of the temple faced east” 

(Eze 47:1).

 â€œThis is He who 

came by water and blood Jesus Christ; not only by water, but by water and blood” (1Joh 5:6). The 
TS Man also presents

 

a blood and serum flow

 

(Malantrucco 1992).

 

D14) â€œAnd Nicodemus, who at first came to Jesus by night, also came, bringing a 

mixture of 

myrrh and aloes

, about a hundred pounds” 

(Joh 19:39).

  â€œThen they took the body of Jesus, and 

bound it in strips of linen with the spices, as the custom of the Jews is to bury”

 (Joh 19:40). 

Some 

researchers state that the TS body was buried with aromatics such as aloe and myrrh because they 
found their traces on the cloth 

(Baima Bollone 1983). 

 

D15) “When Joseph had taken the body, he 

wrapped it in a clean linen cloth

 (or shroud), and laid 

it in his new tomb â€ 

(Mat 27:59-60).

 The TS Man too was enveloped or wrapped in a new and  

expensive sheet, bought by a wealthy person

 (Fanti and Marinelli 1998).

 

D16)“

Nor will You allow

 Your Holy One to see 

corruption

” 

(Act 2:27). 

“For You will not leave my 

soul in Sheol, Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption” 

(Psa 16:10). 

The TS doesn’t 

show signs of putrefaction 

(Fanti and Marinelli 1998).

 

D17)

 

“You shall let 

none of it (the Lamb) remain

 until morning, and what remains of it until 

morning you shall 

burn with fire

. It is the Lord’s Passover” 

(Exo 12:10). 

Some researcher states that 

the TS presents a double sign: the  disappearance  and the burning, if one refers to the radiant 
hypothesis 

(Rinaudo 1998).

   

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

14 

D18) â€œFor as 

lightning

 that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of 

the Son of Man.” 

(Mt 24,27);

 â€œFor the Son of Man in his day will be like the lightning, which flashes 

and lights up the sky from one end to the other.” 

(Lk 17,24).

 The German theologian G. Schwarz 

(1986)

 rectifies the Bible by translation into the Aramaic language. It seems, in doing so, he found 

the Shroud image forming process in the Bible independent on the TS : “As a flash  in lightning and 
shining: so I will exist in my day!” (“my day” = the day of Jesus Resurrection) 

(Scheuermann 1987).

 

D19) “There was a violent 

earthquake

, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, 

going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it.” 

(Matthew 28,2). 

Someone  hypothesise the 

presence of an earthquake as a cause of the body image formation 

(Judica Cordiglia 1986, DeLiso 2002, 

Lattarulo 2003).  

D20) “Then the other disciple, who came to the tomb first, went in also; and 

he saw and believed

For as yet they did not know the Scripture, that He must rise again from the dead” 

(Joh 20:8-9).

 

“David, foreseeing this, spoke concerning the resurrection of the Christ” 

(Act 2:31).

 One hypothesis 

states that the TS Man became mechanically transparent with respect to the sheet and shed a flash 
of energy that would be the cause of the body image formation 

(Jackson 1990).

 Perhaps the particular 

shape of the TS seen by John induced him to believe in Christ’s Resurrection. 

D21) “After that, 

He

 

appeared to more than five hundred

 

of the brothers

 at the same time, most 

of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep.” 

(1. Cor. 15:6)

 Paul has written this letter in 

the year 53-55. The time is too short (eyewitnesses) that all this might be an invention without 
historical nucleus 

(Felzmann 2003).

  

 
 
4) CONCLUSIONS

 

 

 

The first goal posed by the researches of ShroudScience Group on Yahoo!, in order to better 

understand the TS, has been reached: a list of evidences of the TS upon which to base their further 
debate on the body image formation problem has been defined, even if the work

,

 is still in progress. 

Obviously some open questions will be easier to solve if the Turin officials become open to sharing 
new results and those obtained in 2002 to the Shroud Science Group and to any credible researcher 
interested the study about the most important relic of Christianity. 

In consideration of space limitations,  the facts have been  stated in very  simplistic terms, but the 

rich bibliography enclosed will allow the reader to go far more in depth  in reference to the argument 
of interest. 

Many hypotheses have been presented and some natural hypotheses are under test, but 

hypotheses involving the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth can  not be rejected. Among them there 
are hypotheses correlated to an energy source coming from the enveloped or wrapped Man, other 
correlated to surface electrostatic discharges caused by an electric field or other correlated to natural 
chemical reactions also  helped by the body fluids transferred to the cloth,  but  none, scientifically 
testable,  simultaneously satisfies all the facts detected on the Shroud here reported.  On the other 
hand other hypotheses such  as  that of Jackson 

(1990)

 seems to satisfy almost all the presented facts, 

but it is not scientifically testable because  it bases itself on a non-scientific fact: the mechanically-
transparent Man.  

Next  goal of ShroudScience Group on Yahoo! will be the presentation of all the possible 

hypotheses about the body image formation in a detailed form in order to test them against the facts 
reported in this paper. Each hypothesis should have a title in reference to the tecnique involved in 
the TS formation, not only  considering the body image formation; the author’s name who first 
proposed the hypothesis coupled with the researcher’s name who presents it; a detailed technique 
description for the formation of both the body image and the  blood stains; possible correlation or 
interferences with the formation  of other stains such as water; comments and bibliographic 
references. 

 
 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

15 

REFERENCES 

 

1.

 

ACCETTA A.: “Nuclear Radiation and the Shroud: Head Image”, Dallas International Conference on the Shroud of Turin, 
Dallas, Texas, U.S.A., 25-28 October 2001. 

2.

 

ACCETTA J. S. and BAUMGART J. S., "Infrared reflectance spectroscopy and thermographic investigations of the 
Shroud of Turin," Applied Optics 19, 1921-1929 (1980).   

3.

 

ADLER A. D.: “The origin and nature of blood on the Turin Shroud”, in: “Turin Shroud â€“ Image of Christ?” Proceedings 
of the Symposium of Hong Kong, 3-9 March 1986, Cosmos Printing Press Ltd., Hong Kong, March 1987, pp. 57-59. 

4.

 

ADLER A. D.: “Updating Recent Studies on the Shroud of Turin”, ACS Symp. Ser. no. 625, Archaeological Chemistry: 
Organic, Inorganic, and Biochemical Analysis, Mary Virginia Orna Editor, Am. Chem. Soc., ch. 17, pp. 223-228, 1996. 

5.

 

ADLER A.: “The nature of the Body Image on the Shroud of Turin”,  1999, http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/adler.pdf  

6.

 

ADLER, A. D., “The Shroud fabric and the body image: chemical and physical characteristics”, in: “The Turin Shroud, 
past, present and future”, Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium, Torino, 2-5 March 2000, EffatĂ  Editrice, 
Cantalupa (TO) 2000, pp. 51-73.  

7.

 

ADLER A. D., "Further Spectroscopic Investigations of Samples of the Shroud of Turin, Proceedings of the 1998 Dallas 
Shroud Symposium, Michael Minor, ed., Dallas 2000.  Also published in "The Orphaned Manuscript," A Shroud Spectrum 
International Special Issue, Dorothy Crispino, ed. 

8.

 

ADLER A. D., “Chemical and Physical aspects of the Sindonic images” in “The Orphaned Manuscript” Dorothy Crispino, 
ed., EffatĂ  Editrice, Torino Italy, 2002, pg 11-25. 

9.

 

ALLEN N. P.L., “The Turin Shroud and the crystal lens”, Empowerment Technologies Pty Ltd, Porth  Elizabeth, South 
Africa 1998. 

10.

 

ANTONACCI M., “The Resurrection of the Shroud”, M. Evans and C. Inc., New York, USA, 2000. 

11.

 

BAIMA BOLLONE P.L., Benedetto P.P.: Alla ricerca dell’Uomo della Sindone, Ed Mondatori, Milano 1978, p.48. 

12.

 

BAIMA BOLLONE P. L., JORIO M ., A. L. MASSARO: “La dimostrazione della presenza di tracce di sangue umano sulla 
Sindone”, 

Sindon

, Quaderno No. 30, Dicembre 1981, pp. 5-8. 

13.

 

BAIMA BOLLONE P. L.i, JORIO M., A. L. MASSARO: “Identificazione del gruppo delle tracce di sangue umano sulla 
Sindone”, 

Sindon

, Quaderno No. 31, Dicembre 1982, pp. 5-9. 

14.

 

BAIMA BOLLONE P. L., “La presenza della mirra, dell'aloe e del sangue sulla Sindone”, in: “La Sindone, Scienza e 
Fede”, Atti del II Convegno Nazionale di Sindonologia, Bologna 1981, CLUEB, Bologna 1983, pp. 169-174. 

15.

 

BAIMA BOLLONE P. L., “Sindone e scienza all’inizio del terzo millennio”, Editrice La Stampa, Torino 2000.  

16.

 

BAIMA BOLLONE P. L., , MARINO C., PESCARMONA G.: “Il significato del colore delle macchie di sangue della 
Sindone ed il problema della bilirubina”,

 Sindon

 

Nuova Serie

, Quaderno No. 15, Giugno 2001, pp. 19-29. 

17.

 

BALOSSINO N., “L'immagine della Sindone, ricerca fotografica e informatica”, Elle Di Ci, Leumann (TO) 1997.  

18.

 

BARBESINO F., MORONI M., “L'ordalia del Carbonio 14”, Mimep-Docete, Pessano (MI) 1997.  

19.

 

BARBET P.: “La prova della autenticitĂ  della Sindone nelle sue macchie di sangue”, 

Sindon

, Quaderno No. 14-15, 

Dicembre 1970, pp. 21-43. 

20.

 

BASSO R., BIANCHINI G., FANTI G.: “ CompatibilitĂ  fra immagine corporea digitalizzata e un manichino antropomorfo 
computerizzato ” Congresso Mondiale “Sindone 2000”, Orvieto, 27-29 Agosto 2000 
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~latendre/art1.pdf. 

21.

 

BENFORD, MS., MARINO. J.  â€œTextile Evidence Supports Skewed Radiocarbon Date of Shroud of Turin”, 2002, 
http://shroud.com/pdfs/textevid.pdf  

22.

 

BENFORD, MS., MARINO. J., special contribution by Robert Buden, President, Tapestries and Treasures.  â€œHistorical 
Support of a 16

th

 Century Restoration in the Shroud C-14 Sample Area”, 2002, http://shroud.com/pdfs/histsupt.pdf  

23.

 

BONTE, W., in HERBST, K. "Kriminalfall Golgatha", Deutscher BĂŒcherbund, 1992 

24.

 

BORTOLUZZI D. degree thesis tutored by G. Fanti, academic year 2001-2002, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, 
Padua University, Italy; http://www.shroud.com/group/radiation.pdf. 

25.

 

BRILLANTE Carlo: “La fibrinolisi nella genesi delle impronte sindoniche”, in: “La Sindone, Scienza e Fede”, Atti del II 
Convegno Nazionale di Sindonologia, Bologna 27-29 Novembre 1981, CLUEB, Bologna 1983, pp. 239-241. 

26.

 

BRILLANTE C., FANTI G., MARINELLI E., “Bloodstains characteristics to be considered in laboratory reconstruction of 
the Turin Shroud”, IV Symposium Scientifique International sur le Linceul de Turin, Paris, 25-26 April 2002. 

27.

 

BROWN J. Shroud Science Group communication 2004. 

28.

 

BRUNATI E. Shroud Science Group communication 2003. 

29.

 

BUCKLIN R.: The Shroud of Turin: Viewpoint of a Forensic Pathologist, Shroud Spectrum International, N.S., Dec 1982 
and Legal Medicine annual, W.B. Sauders, Philadelphia, July 1982. 

30.

 

CAGNAZZO A., “Analisi antropometrica della Sindone di Torino mediante sistemi di visione”, Degree thesis, tutor G. 
Fanti, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, UniversitĂ  di Padova, Academic Year 1997/98.  

31.

 

CARREIRA Manuel M., La SĂĄbana Santa desde el punto de vista de la fĂ­sica, in: AA. VV.  â€“ La SĂ­ndone de TurĂ­n  â€“ 
Estudios y aportaciones â€“ Cento Español de  SindonologĂ­a, Valencia 1998, pp. 141-172. 

32.

 

CHAMBERLAIN T. C., "The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses," Journal of Geology, 5(8), 837-848 (1987). 

33.

 

CRAIG E. A., BRESEE R. R.: “ Image Formation and the Shroud of Turin”, Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 
Volume 38, No. 1, pp. 59-67, 1994. 

34.

 

CRAIG E.: Shroud Science Group communication 2003; 2004. 

35.

 

CURTO S. La S. Sindone, ricerche e studi della commissione d’esperti nominata dall’Arcivescovo di Torino Card. Michele 
Pellegrino, nel 1969, Supplemento alla rivista diocesana Torinese, gennaio 1976, pp 59-85 

36.

 

DANIN A., WHANGER A. D., BARUCH U., WHANGER M., “Flora of the Shroud of Turin”, Missouri Botanical Garden 
Press, 1999, pp. 1-52.  

37.

 

DAMON P.E., DONAHUE D.J., GORE B.H., HATHEWAY A.L., JULL A.J.T., LINICK T.W., SERCEL P.J., TOOLIN 
L.J., BRONK C.R., HALL E.T., HEDGES R.E.M., HOUSLEY R., LAW I.A., PERRY C., BONANI G., TRUMBORE S., 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

16 

WÖLFLI W., AMBERS J.C., BOWMAN S.G.E., LEESE M.N., TITE M.S., “Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin”, 

Nature

, Vol. 337, February 16, 1989, pp. 611-615.  

38.

 

DE CECCO M. FANTI G., Study for a Vision System for the Colorimetric Mapping of the Turin Shroud, III Int. Congress 
Studies on the Turin Shroud, Turin, Italy, 1998, http://www.shroud.com/fanti4en.pdf. 

39.

 

DE LISO G.: "Verifica sperimentale della formazione di immagini su teli di lino trattati con aloe e mirra in concomitanza 
di terremoti", "Sindon Nuova Serie", Quad. n. 14, dicembre 2000, pp. 125-130 

40.

 

DE LISO G.: “Verifica Sperimentale della Formazione di Immagini su Teli Trattati con Aloe e Mirra in Concomitanza di 
Sismi”, IV Int. Scientific Symposium on the Turin Shroud, Paris, 25-26 April 2002. 

41.

 

DE SALVO J. A., “The image formation process of the Shroud of Turin and its similarities to Volckringer patterns”, 

Sindon

 n. 31, dicembre 1982, pp. 43-50. 

42.

 

EVANS Mark collection of photomicrographs archived by Barrie Schwortz, especially ME-29, 1978 

43.

 

ERCOLINE, W.R., DOWNS  R.C. Jr., JACKSON J.P., “Examination of the Turin Shroud for image  distortions”, IEEE 
1982 Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, October 1982, pp. 576-579. 

44.

 

FANTI G., MARINELLI E.: “Results of a Probabilistic Model Applied to the Research carried out on the Turin Shroud”,  
III Int. Congress Studies on the Turin Shroud, Turin, Italy, 1998, http://www.shroud.com/fanti3en.pdf.   

45.

 

FANTI G., MARINELLI E.: “Cento prove sulla Sindone: un giudizio probabilistico sull’autenticità”, Ed.  Messaggero, 
Padova, Italy 1999. 

46.

 

FANTI G., MARINELLI E.: “ A study of the front and back body enveloping based on 3D information”, Dallas 
International Conference on the Shroud of Turin, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A., 25-28 October 2001 

47.

 

G. Fanti, M. Moroni: “Comparison of Luminance Between Face of Turin Shroud Man and Experimental Results”, Journal 
of Imaging Science and Technology, 2002, vol. 46-2, pp. 142-154, March/April 2002, Internet: 
http://www.imaging.org/store/epub.cfm?abstrid=8125 

48.

 

FANTI G.: “A review of 3d characteristics of the Turin Shroud body image” Worksohop Italy-Canada on 3D Digital 
Imaging and Modeling Applications of heritage, industry, medicine & land, Padova, April 3-4 2001. 

49.

 

FANTI G., FARAON S., “Pulizia e ricostruzione computerizzata dell’immagine corporea dell’Uomo della Sindone”, in: 
Atti del Congresso Mondiale Sindone 2000, Orvieto 27-28 agosto 2000, Gerni Editori, San Severo (FG) 2002, vol. I pp. 
25-31 e vol. III pp.11-18. 

50.

 

FANTI G., Shroud Science Group communication 2003; 2004, 2005. 

51.

 

FANTI G., MARINELLI: “La Sindone Rinnovata â€“ misteri e certezze”, Progetto Editoriale Mariano, Vigodarzere, Padova, 
Italy 2003. 

52.

 

FANTI G., MAGGIOLO R.: The double superficiality of the frontal image of the Turin Shroud, accepted for publication in 
Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics as a paper, 12 March 2004. 

53.

 

FANTI G., “Resolution of images obtained without a camera using MTF curves”, Shroud Science Group communication 
2004. 

54.

 

FANTI G.,

 

- Fanti G: “Valutazione della risoluzione di immagini mediante analisi del modulo della funzione di 

trasferimento”, accepted for Congresso di Misure Meccaniche e Termiche, Brescia, Settembre 2005. 

55.

 

FANTI G.,  LATTARULO F.,  SCHEUERMANN O.: Body Image Formation Hypothesis Based on Corona Discharge, 
Third Dallas International Conference on the Shroud of Turin: Dallas, Texas, September 8-11, 2005. 

56.

 

Fanti G., Lattarulo F., Scheuermann O.: Body Image Formation Hypotheses  Based On Corona Discharge,  The Third 
Dallas International Conference on the Shroud of Turin, Dallas, Texas, September 8-11, 2005. 

57.

 

FARAON S., Tecniche di elaborazione numerica per la ricostruzione tridimensionale dell’immagine corporea contenuta 
nella Sindone di Torino, Tesi di laurea, relatore G. Fanti, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, UniversitĂ  di Padova, 
Anno Accademico 1998/99. 

58.

 

FELLER, R L., _Accelerated aging : photochemical and thermal aspects_, The J. Paul Getty Trust, 1994, 292 pages  

59.

 

FEIGL, F. and ANGER, V., 1966, Spot Tests in Organic Analysis, Elsevier Pub. Co., New York. 

60.

 

FELZMANN H., Shroud Science Group communication 2003-2005 

61.

 

FELZMANN H., "MĂŒssen Christen anders glauben", Triga 2005. 

62.

 

FILAS F., The Dating of the Shroud of Turin from coins of Pontius Pilate, Cogan, Youngtown, Arizona, USA, 1982. 

63.

 

FLURY LEMBERG M: “Die leinwand des Turiner Grabtuches zum technischen befund”, in: “The Turin Shroud.  Past, 
present and future”, Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium of Turin, 2-5 March 2000, EffatĂ  Ed., 
Cantalupa (TO) 2000, pp. 21-43. 

64.

 

FLURY LEMBERG M.: “Un tessuto di preziositĂ  incalcolabile”, in: ZACCONE G. M. (Ed.), “Le due facce della Sindone, 
pellegrini e scienziati alla ricerca di un volto”, Ed. ODPF, Torino 2001, pp. 137-142.  

65.

 

FLURY LEMBERG M., “Sindone 2002 Preservation", ed. ODPF, Torino 2003. 

66.

 

FORD D.: “The Shroud of Turin’s ‘blood’ images: blood, or paint? A history of science inquiry”, 2000, 
http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ford1.pdf 

67.

 

FREI M., “Il passato della Sindone alla luce della palinologia”, in: “La Sindone e la Scienza”, Atti del II Congresso 
Internazionale di Sindonologia, Torino 1978,  Edizioni Paoline, Torino 1979, pp. 191-200. 

68.

 

FREI M., “Identificazione e classificazione dei nuovi pollini della Sindone”, in: “La Sindone, Scienza e Fede”, Atti del II 
Convegno Nazionale di Sindonologia, Bologna 1981, CLUEB, Bologna 1983, pp. 277-284. 

69.

 

GASTINEAU P. 1974, http://perso.wanadoo.fr/gira.cadouarn/english/faq_english/tridimensionality.htm. 

70.

 

GARZA-VALDES L., “The DNA of God?”, Berkley Books, New York, 2001.  

71.

 

GHIBERTI G., “Sindone le immagini 2002 Shroud images”, ODPF, Torino 2002. 

72.

 

GILBERT R. Jr. and GILBERT M,.  "Ultraviolet-visible reflectance and fluorescence spectra of the Shroud of Turin," 
Applied Optics 19, 1930-1936 (1980).   

73.

 

GLICK G. , Shroud Science Group communication 2003. 

74.

 

GROBSTEIN P., BUTOI B., Lateral Inhibition Simulator http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/latinhib_app.html, 1997. 

75.

 

GRUBER E.R, KERSTEN H., "Jesus starb nicht am Kreuz - Die Botschaft des Turiner Grabtuchs", Langen MĂŒller,  
Munich 1998  

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

17 

76.

 

GUERRESCHI A: “New Elements Revealed from Photograh about two Details: the Wound in The Wrist and the Right 
Eye”, Worldwide Congress “Sindone 2000”, Orvieto, 27-29 Agosto 2000. 

77.

 

GUERRESCHI A. and SALCITO M.: Ricerche fotografiche e informatiche sulle bruciature e sugli aloni visibili sulla 
Sindone e conseguenze sul piano storico,  4th International Scientific Symposium, Centre International d’Études sur le 
Linceul de Turin, Paris, April 25-26, 2002. 

78.

 

HAROLDSEN B., , Shroud Science Group communication 2003. 

79.

 

HARALICK, R.M., "Analysis of Digital Images of the Shroud of Turin," Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, VA 
1983. 

80.

 

HELLER J. H. and ADLER A. D.,: “Blood on the Shroud of Turin”, 

Applied Optics

, Vol. 19, No. 16, August 15, 1980, pp. 

2742-2744. 

81.

 

HELLER J. H. and ADLER A. D., "A Chemical Investigation of the Shroud of Turin," Canadian Society of Forensic 
Science Journal 14 (1981), pp.81-103.  

82.

 

HELLER J. H.: “Report on the Shroud of Turin”, Houghton Mifflin C., Boston 1983, p. 144. 

83.

 

HOARE R., "The Turin shroud is genuine",  Souvenir Press, London 1994 

84.

 

IACAZIO, P.  - La qualitĂ  del microcontrollo tessile della Santa Sindone, International Congress for the Study of the 
Shroud of Turin"Science and the Shroud"    June 5 through 7, Turin, Italy, 1998.  

85.

 

IACAZIO, P., Shroud Science Group communication 2004. 

86.

 

INTRIGILLO G., Sindone, l’istruttoria del secolo, Edizioni San Paolo, Cinisello Balsamo (Milano) 1998, p. 76.  

87.

 

ISO-GUM, Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (International Organization for Standardization, 
Geneva, Switzerland, 1993), http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Uncertainty/isoorder.html. 

88.

 

JACKSON J. P. JUMPER E.J., MOTTERN B. , STEVENSON E.: The Three Dimensional Image on Jesus’ Burial Cloth, 
E.J., “Proceedings of the 1977 United States Conference of research on the Shroud of Turin”, Albuquerque 1977, Holy 
Shroud Guild, New York 1977. 

89.

 

JACKSON J.P., JUMPER E.J., ERCOLINE W.R., “Three dimensional characteristic of the Shroud Image”, IEEE 1982 
Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, October 1982, pp. 559-575. 

90.

 

JACKSON J.P., JUMPER E.J., ERCOLINE W.R., “Correlation of image intensity on the Turin Shroud with the 3-D 
structure of a human body shape” - 

Applied Optics

, Vol. 23, No. 14, July 15, 1984, pp. 2244-2270. 

91.

 

JACKSON J.: The Vertical Alignment of the Frontal Image, Shroud Spectrum International No. 32/33,1989; 

92.

 

JACKSON J.:  "Blood and Possible Images of Blood on the Shroud" Shroud Spectrum International No. 24, Sept. 1987; 

93.

 

JACKSON John P.: “Is the image on the Shroud due to a process heretofore unknown to modern science?”, 

Shroud 

Spectrum International

 No. 34, March 1990, pp. 3-29.  

94.

 

JACKSON J. P., Does the Shroud of Turin show us the Resurrection?, Biblia y Fe, 1998 

95.

 

JUDICA CORDIGLIA G., “L'Uomo della Sindone Ăš il GesĂč dei Vangeli?”, Ed. Fondazione Pelizza, Chiari, BS, Italy, 1974  

96.

 

JUDICA CORDIGLIA G. B: La Sindone immagine elettrostatica? in: “La Sindone, nuovi studi e ricerche”, Atti del III 
Congresso Nazionale di Studi sulla Sindone, Trani 1984, Edizioni Paoline, Cinisello Balsamo (MI) 1986, pp. 314-325. 

97.

 

JUDICA CORDIGLIA G. B:  IR photography furnished to G. Fanti in 2001.  

98.

 

JUMPER E. J., ADLER A. D., JACKSON J. P., PELLICORI S. F., HELLER J. H., and DRUZIK J. R., "A comprehensive 
examination of the various stains and images on the Shroud of Turin," ACS Advances in Chemistry, Archaeological 
Chemistry III:205, 447-476 (1984).   

99.

 

KUHNKE, G, "Rom und das Grabtuch", Tenea 2004. 

100.

 

KERLIN J.:http://childrensermons.com/shroud/present.htm. 

101.

 

KOHLBECK J. A., NITOWSKI E. L., “New evidence may explain image on Shroud of Turin”, 

Biblical Archaeology 

Review

, vol. 12, n. 4, luglio-agosto 1986, pp.23-24. 

102.

 

LATTARULO F.:  L'immagine sindonica spiegata attraverso un processo sismoelettrico,  III Congresso internazionale di 
studi sulla Sindone, Torino, 5-7 Giugno 1998. 

103.

 

LATTARULO F.: Shroud Science Group communication 2003 and private communication to G. Fanti 2003. 

104.

 

LAVOIE G. R., LAVOIE B. B., DONOVAN V. J., BALLAS J. S., “Blood on the Shroud of Turin: Part I, 

Shroud 

Spectrum International

 n. 7, giugno 1983,  pp. 15-20. 

105.

 

LAVOIE G. R., LAVOIE B. B., DONOVAN V. J., BALLAS J. S.: “Blood on the Shroud of Turin: Part II  â€“ The 
importance of time in the transfer of blood clots to cloth as distinctive clot images”, 

Shroud Spectrum International

, No. 8, 

September 1983, pp. 2-10. 

106.

 

LAVOIE G., Resurrected, Texas: Thomas More, 2000.  

107.

 

LAVOIE G., Shroud Science Group communication 2003. 

108.

 

LEVI-SETTI R.,CROW C., WANG Y. L.: “Progress in H>igh Resolution scannino Ion microscopi and Secondary Ion 
Mass Spectrometry Imaging Microanalysis”, Scanning Electron Microscopy 2, 1985; 535-552  

109.

 

LINDNER E., “The Shroud of Jesus Christ: the ‘Scientific Gospel’ to renew the faith in Resurrection”, in: Atti del 
Congresso Mondiale Sindone 2000, Orvieto 27-28 agosto 2000, Gerni Editori, San Severo (FG) 2002, vol. I pp. 165-173 e 
vol. III pp. 55-58. 

110.

 

LORRE J. J. - Lynn D. J., Digital enhancement of images of the Shroud of Turin, in: Proceedings of the 1977 United States 
Conference of research on the Shroud of Turin, Albuquerque 1977, Holy Shroud Guild, New York 1977. 

111.

 

MAGGIOLO R.:  Procedure eidomatiche anche basate sulla trasformata spaziale di Fourier per il miglioramento delle 
immagini: applicazione alla Sindone di Torino, Tesi di laurea, relatore G. Fanti, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, 
UniversitĂ  di Padova, Anno Accademico 2002/03, http://www.shroud.com/group/facereverse.jpg. 

112.

 

MALANTRUCCO L., “L'equivoco Sindone”, LDC, Leumann, Torino, Italy, 1992. 

113.

 

MALONEY, P. C., “The current status of pollen research and prospects for the future”, Relazione al Symposium 
Scientifique International de Paris sur le Linceul de Turin, 7-8 Septembre 1989.  

114.

 

MALONEY, P. C., Shroud Science Group communication 2004. 

115.

 

MARINO, J., BENFORD MS.  â€œEvidence for the Skewing of the C-14 Dating of the Shroud of Turin Due to Repairs”, 
2000, http://shroud.com/pdfs/marben.pdf. 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

18 

116.

 

MARION A. , COURAGE A. L., La Sacra Sindone, Neri Pozza, Vicenza, Italy, 1998. 

117.

 

MARION A. "Discovery of Inscriptions on the Shroud of Turin, “Digital Image Processing", Optical Engineering, vol. 37, 
pgs. 2308-2313, 1998. 

118.

 

MCCRONE W. C. and SKIRIUS C., "Light Microscopical Study of the Turin 'Shroud,' I," Microscope 28, 105 (1980).   

119.

 

MCCRONE W. C.: “Light microscopical study of the Turin ‘Shroud’ II”, 

The Microscope

 28, No. 4, 1980, pp. 115-120;  

120.

 

MCCRONE W. C.: “Light microscopical study of the Turin ‘Shroud’ III”, 

The Microscope

 29, No. 1, 1981, pp. 19-39. 

121.

 

MCCRONE W. C.: â€œShroud image is the work of an artist”, 

The Skeptical Inquirer 

6, No. 3, 1982, pp. 35-36;  

122.

 

MCCRONE W. C.: “The Shroud of Turin: blood or artist's pigment?”, 

Accounts of Chemical Research

, American 

Chemical Society, 23, 1990, pp. 77-83;  

123.

 

MCCRONE W. C.: “Shroud 1999”, 

The Microscope

 47, No. 1, 1999, pp. 55-61;  

124.

 

MCCRONE W. C.: “The Shroud Image”, 

The Microscope

 48, No. 2, 2000, pp. 79-85. 

125.

 

MEACHAM, W., “The authentication of the Turin Shroud: An Issue in Archaeological Epistemology”, Current 
Anthropology, Vol. 24, No. 3, June 1983, pp. 283-311. 

126.

 

MILLER V. D. and PELLICORI S. F., "Ultraviolet fluorescence photography of the Shroud of Turin," Journal of 
Biological Photography 49, 71-85 (1981).] 

127.

 

MILLER V. D. Personal communication to R. Rogers, 14 June 2003. 

128.

 

MORAN K., FANTI G.: “Does the Shroud body image show any physical evidence of Resurrection?”, 4th International 
Scientific Symposium, Centre International d’Études sur le Linceul de Turin, Paris, April 25-26, 2002. 

129.

 

MORONI M., “Teoria numismatica dell'itinerario  sindonico”, in: “La Sindone, nuovi studi e ricerche”, Atti del III 
Congresso Nazionale di Studi sulla Sindone, Trani 1984, Edizioni Paoline, Cinisello Balsamo (MI) 1986, pp. 103-124. 

130.

 

MORONI M., BARBESINO F., “Apologia di un falsario”, Maurizio Minchella Editore, Milano 1997.  

131.

 

MORRIS R. A., SCHWALBE L. A., and LONDON J. R., "X-Ray Fluorescence Investigation of the  

132.

 

Shroud of Turin," X-Ray Spectrometry 9, 40-47 (1980). 

133.

 

MOTTERN R. W., LONDON R. J., and MORRIS R. A., "Radiographic Examination of the Shroud of Turin  - a 
Preliminary Report," Materials Evaluation 38, 39-44 (1979).   

134.

 

MUNGAI C., “Analisi della correlazione fra luminanza e distanza di immagini aventi caratteristiche di tridimensionalità”, 
Degree thesis, tutor G. Fanti, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, UniversitĂ  di Padova, academic yera 2001/2002. 

135.

 

NEAL R. Shroud Science Group communication 2004. 

136.

 

NICKELL J.: “Inquest on the Shroud of Turin”, New Updated Ed., 1997. 

137.

 

NIST web site, http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/contents.html. 

138.

 

NIST-Uncertainty: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Uncertainty/glossary.html; 
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Uncertainty/basic.html. 

139.

 

NITOWSKI E.,”The field and Laboratory Report of the Environmental Study of the Shroud in Jerusalem, Carmentile 
Monastery, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 1986. 

140.

 

NITOWSKI E., “Through the Microscope”, Ariel Museum, Salt Lake City 1998.  

141.

 

PASTORE F. , 

La struttura tessile della Sindone

, in: La Sindone, indagini scientifiche - Atti del IV Congresso Nazionale di 

Studi sulla Sindone, Siracusa 1987 - Ed.Paoline, Cinisello Balsamo -MI 1988, pp. 64-73. 

142.

 

PESCE DELFINO V.: “E l'uomo creĂČ la sindone”, II Ed. Dedalo, Bari 2000.  

143.

 

PELLICORI S. F., "Spectral properties of the Shroud of Turin," Applied Optics, 19 (1980), pp. 1913-1920.   

144.

 

PELLICORI S. F. and EVANS M. S., "The Shroud of Turin Through the Microscope," Archaeology, January/February 35-
43 (1981).  

145.

 

PERSILI A., 

Sulle tracce del Cristo Risorto

, Ed. Casa della Stampa, Tivoli Italy, 1988. 

146.

 

PETROSILLO O,   MARINELLI E., La Sindone, storia di un enigma, Rizzoli, Milano 1998, p. 267. 

147.

 

PICKNETT L., PRINCE C., “Turin Shroud”, Harper Collins, New York, USA 1994. 

148.

 

PORTER D.: Shroud Science Group communication 2003; 2004. 

149.

 

QUIDOR G. 1913, http://perso.wanadoo.fr/gira.cadouarn/english/faq_english/tridimensionality.htm. 

150.

 

G. RAES  "The textile study of 1973-1974", published by Curto S. in  La S. Sindone, Rivista Diocesana Torinese, 79-
83,1974. 

151.

 

G. RAES  Shroud Spectrum International n°38/30, 1991. 

152.

 

RICCI G., “L'Uomo della Sindone Ăš GesĂč, diamo le prove”, Ed. Carroccio, Vigodarzere (PD) 1989. 

153.

 

RIGGI G., Rapporto Sindone 1978-1982, Il Piccolo Ed., Torino 1982. 

154.

 

 RIGGI G., verbal communication to G. Fanti 2003. 

155.

 

 RINAUDO J. B.: “Image formation on the Shroud of Turin explained by a protonic model affecting radiocarbon dating”, 
III Congresso internazionale di studi sulla Sindone, Torino, 5-7 Giugno 1998. 

156.

 

RODANTE S., Le realtĂ  della Sindone, Massimo, Milano 1987. 

157.

 

ROGERS, R. N., SMITH, L. C., "Application of Combined Pyrolysis  â€“ TLC to the Study of Chemical Kinetics," J.  
Chromatog. 48, 268 (1970). 

158.

 

ROGERS R. "Proceedings of the 1977 United States Conference of research on the Shroud of Turin", Albuquerque 1977, 
Holy Shroud Guild, New York 1977 

159.

 

ROGERS R. Research Notebood: Shroud, October 1978. 

160.

 

ROGERS R, Research Notebook: Shroud, 1978-1981. 

161.

 

ROGERS R, personal communication, 1981. 

162.

 

ROGERS R.. “Scientific method applied to the Shroud of Turin, a review”,  http://shroud.com/pdfs/rogers2.pdf, 2002 

163.

 

ROGERS R. Shroud Science Group communication 2003, 2004. 

164.

 

ROGERS R.: Studies on the radiocarbon sample from the Shroud of Turin. Thermochimica Acta, Vol. 425, Issues 1-2 , 20 
Jan. 2005, pp. 189-194. 

165.

 

SCARPELLI N. : Analisi dele deformazionidel tessuto della S. Sindone in ”, in: “La Sindone, Scienza e Fede”, Atti del II 
Convegno Nazionale di Sindonologia, Bologna 1981, CLUEB, Bologna 1983, pp. 337-344. 

166.

 

SCHNEIDER. Shroud Science Group communication 2004. 

background image

THE THIRD DALLAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 

ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: DALLAS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 8-11, 2005 

 

 

19 

167.

 

SCHWALBE L. A. and R. N. ROGERS, "Physics and Chemistry of the Shroud of Turin, a Summary of the 1978 
Investigations," Analytica Chimica Acta 135 (1982), pp.3-49. 

168.

 

SCHEUERMANN O.: “Hypothesis: Electron emission or absorption as the mechanism that created the image on the 
Shroud of Turin â€“ Proof by experiment” first edition September 1983, Fondazione 3M, Segrate, Milano, Italy 2003. 

169.

 

SCHEUERMANN O.: “Appendix I to Hypothesis: Electron emission or absorption as the mechanism that created the 
image on the Shroud of Turin â€“ Proof by experiment”, Sept. 1984, private communication to G. Fanti 

170.

 

SCHEUERMANN O.:”Das Tuch”, Verlag Friedrich Pustet, Regensburg, Deutschland, 1987. 

171.

 

SCHWARZ GĂŒnther: “der Menschensohn”  â€“ Aramaistische Untersuchungen zu den synoptischen Menschensohnworten 
Jesu: BeitrĂ€ge zu Weisssenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testament, 1986, Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart/Berlin/Köln. 

172.

 

SCHNEIDER R. Shroud Science Group communication 2004, 2005. 

173.

 

SCHWORTZ B., Shroud Science Group communication 2003, 2004, 2005. 

174.

 

SIMIONATO A., “Caratteristiche tridimensionali dell’Uomo della Sindone: analisi cinematica con manichino numerico e 
confronti sperimentali”, Tesi di laurea, relatore G. Fanti, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, UniversitĂ  di Padova, 
Anno Accademico 1998/99. 

175.

 

SULLIVAN B., “The Shroud of Turin:Report of preliminary studies”National Review, July 20, 1973. 

176.

 

SVENSSON

 

N. 

Shroud Science Group communication 2005. 

177.

 

UPINSKY A.A., June 1993,  Paris Conference. 

178.

 

UPINSKY A. A., “L’énigme du Linceul, la prophĂ©tie de l’an 2000”, Fayard, Paris 1998.  

179.

 

VAN HAELST R., Radiocarbon Dating the Turin Shroud, http://www.shroud.com/vanhels3.htm, 1997. 

180.

 

VIAL  G., in "Étude Technique du Linceul de Turin, in Actes du 1er Symposium  International de Paris, CIELT 1989. 

181.

 

VIGNON P., “Le Saint-Suaire de Turin devant la Science, l'Archeologie, l'Histoire, l'Iconographie, la Logique”, Masson et 
C. Editeurs, Paris 1902. 

182.

 

VOLCKRINGER J., “The Holy Shroud: science confronts the imprints”, The Runciman Press, Manly, Australia 1991. 

183.

 

WHANGER A. D., WHANGER M., “Polarized image overlay technique: a new image comparison method and its 
applications”, 

Applied Optics

, Vol. 24, No. 6, March 15, 1985, pp. 766-772. 

184.

 

WHANGER A. D., Shroud Science Group communication 2003-2005. 

185.

 

WHANGER A. D.,  WHANGER M. W., 

A comparison of the Sudarium of Oviedo and the Shroud of Turin using the 

polarized image overlay technique

, in: Sudario del Señor, Actas del I Congreso Internacional sobre El Sudario de Oviedo, 

Oviedo, 29-31 Octubre 1994 - Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Oviedo 1996, pp. 379-381. 

186.

 

WHANGER M. & A. "The Shroud of Turin, An Adventure of Discovery," Providence House Publishers, Franklin, TN 
1998.  

187.

 

WHANGER A. D., Council for Study of the Shroud of Turin 2000, http://www.duke.edu/~adw2/shroud/ 

188.

 

WHANGER A. D., "Evidence for Radiation from the Shroud Image Itself in the Formation of the Shroud Images,", in "The 
Turin Shroud: Past, Present, and Future," Eds. Scannerini, S. and Savarino, P., Effata Editrice, Turin, Italy 2000. 

189.

 

WOLFS F., Introduction to the Scientific Method, 2000, 

        http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixE/AppendixE.html. 
190.

 

WILSON I., “The blood and the Shroud, new evidence that the world's most sacred relic is real”, The Free Press, New 
York 1998.  

191.

 

WILSON N. http://www.shadowshroud.com/images.htm. 

192.

 

ZANINOTTO G., Flagellazione romana, Centro Romano di Sindonologia, Roma 1984. 

193.

 

ZANINOTTO G., Pier Angelo Gramaglia ovvero: il complesso del barbitonsore, Collegamento pro Sindone, settembre-
ottobre 1989, pp. 42-49. 

194.

 

ZUGIBE and ROGERS collection of 86 photomicrographs, archived by Barrie Schwortz 1978, 1985. 

195.

 

ZUGIBE F. Shroud Science Group communication 2003; 2004. 

196.

 

ZUGIBE F., The Crucifiction of Jesus, a Forensic Inquiry, M. Evans & Co. New York 2005.