background image

 

THE SHROUD OF TURIN: AN AMINO-CARBONYL REACTION 

(MAILLARD REACTION) MAY EXPLAIN THE IMAGE FORMATION 

 

Raymond N. Rogers* & Anna Arnoldi† 

©2003 All Rights Reserved 

This article originally appeared in Melanoidins vol. 4, Ames J.M. ed., Office for Official 

Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2003, pp.106-113. 

 

*University of California, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1961 Cumbres Patio, Los 

Alamos, NM  87544, USA 

 
†University of Milan, Department of Molecular Agrifood Sciences, via Celoria 2, 20133 

Milano, Italy. 

 

Summary. 

The Shroud of Turin is a large piece of linen that shows the faint image of a 

man on its surface: it has been claimed to be the shroud of Jesus. Here we report evidences that 
colour can be produced by reactions between reducing sugars, left on the cloth by the 
manufacturing procedure, and amines deriving from the decomposition of a corpse. Treatment of 
a cloth prepared according to the ancient technology gave a distribution of colour on the thread 
fibres in good agreement with the Shroud features. Such a natural image-production process 
would support the hypothesis that the Shroud of Turin had been a real shroud. However, these 
observations do not

 prove

 how the image was formed or the "authenticity" of the Shroud.   

 
INTRODUCTION.

 

 

 
The Shroud of Turin is a large piece of linen that shows the faint image of a man on its 

surface (Jumper et al., 1984). It has been claimed to be the shroud of Jesus, making it very 
controversial.

  

In 1978, its custodians allowed the Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP) to test the 

different image-formation hypotheses. The outstanding characteristic of the image on the Shroud 
of Turin is the discontinuous distribution of the colour on the surface. STURP members took 
many photomicrographs of the surface of the Shroud in 1978 (Pellicori & Evans, 1981). They 
reported that the image "consists of a light sepia colour with the darkest coloration on the thread 
tops." All image areas are very faint, and most image fibres are gold (Schwalbe & Rogers, 1982). 
The colour density seen in any area of the image appeared primarily to be a function of the 
number of coloured fibres per unit area rather than a significant difference in colour density, 
which was called the "half-tone" effect.  A very specific feature is that the colour appeared only 
on the surface of individual fibres (Heller and Adler, 1981). 

No image fibres were cemented together by any foreign material, which seemed to 

eliminate any image-formation hypothesis that was based on the flow of a liquid into the cloth. 
The hypothesis of a gaseous diffusion into the cloth would have produced a colour gradient 
through its thickness (Schwalbe & Rogers, 1982).

  

Visible and ultraviolet spectrometry, infrared spectrometry, x-ray fluorescence 

spectrometry, and direct microscopic viewing did not detect any known Medieval painting 
materials. Later microscopy, microchemistry, pyrolysis-mass-spectrometry, and laser-microprobe 

background image

 

Raman analyses failed to detect foreign materials. Pyrolysis-mass-spectrometry analysis was 
sufficiently sensitive to detect ppb levels of polyethylene oligomers that came from sample bags. 
Reflectance spectra of image areas, scorched areas, and aged linen were identical (Gilbert and 
Gilbert, 1982).  In conclusion, all the observational methods applied by STURP failed to detect 
any of the historically known painting vehicles, media, or pigments, suggesting that the image 
was not a painting in any normal sense (Schwalbe & Rogers, 1982). 

Taking into account all these results, it was decided to check the hypothesis that the image 

could derive from an amino-carbonyl reaction between sugar residues on the cloth and amino 
derivatives produced by the corpse post-mortem reactions. In order to get historically reliable 
results, experiments were performed on  a linen cloth prepared following exactly the procedure 
described by Pliny the Elder (77).  

 

RESULTS 

 

Observations on the cloth.  
 

 

 
 

Every scientific hypothesis for image formation has to take into account and explain a very 

important experimental fact:  although the surfaces of Shroud image fibres show a characteristic 
golden colour, their medullas are clear (Figure  1  above  ), which supports the Heller and Adler 
observation that all image colour resides on fibre surfaces (Heller and Adler, 1984). They 
reported that: "The absence of products expected from a high-temperature cellulose degradation 
[…] suggests that the process that formed the final chemistry took place at lower temperatures 
(less than 200ºC), because no pyrolytic compounds were found. The fluorescence  of the scorch 
areas, however, demonstrates the presence of high-temperature pyrolytic products in these 
areas"(Heller and Adler, 1984).  

background image

 

Several holes were burned in the cloth when the shroud was badly damaged in a fire in 

1532. Scorch colours between light lemon yellow and black appear around these holes and the 
fibres involved are coloured all of the way through their diameter. Fluorescent products are 
observed around the burned areas, confirming high temperature pyrolysis conditions. 

Observations of weave density and lignin content of the shroud fibres (Rogers, 2001)

 

indicate a very mild bleaching technique in agreement with the methods described by Pliny the 
Elder (77). The same technology was in use, with some minor differences, until after the last 
crusade in 1291 (Hochberg, 1980). Linen was spun by hand on a spindle whorl. When the spindle 
was full, the spinner made a hank of thread. Each hank of thread was bleached separately, and 
each was a little different. Different parts of the same thread in the shroud's weave show slightly 
different colours, like a variegated yarn. The warp thread was protected with starch during the 
weaving process, making the cloth stiff. The final cloth was washed in a solution made from 

Saponaria officinalis.

 

Saponaria 

produces four glycosidic saponins, and all hydrolyse to produce 

sugar chains. (Ya Chirva et al., 1969) The following carbohydrates were identified in those 
chains: galactose, glucose, arabinose, xylose, fucose, rhamnose, and glucuronic acid.  

The presence of starch, in particular amilose, on the shroud was confirmed by the fact that 

during testing for sulfoproteins in blood areas with an iodine-azide reagent (which bubbles 
vigorously when sulfur is present), a reddish background was formed. Image colour does not 
appear under the bloodstains when they are removed with a proteolytic enzyme.  Whatever 
process produced the image, colour must have occurred after the blood flowed onto (or was 
painted onto) the cloth, and the image-producing process did not destroy the blood (Heller and 
Adler, 1981). 

Saponaria officinalis,

 also called "soapweed," reduces the surface tension of water making 

it a good wetting agent. Both hydrophobic and hydrophilic materials on a newly woven cloth are 
put into solution or suspension by 

Saponaria

. After been washed in a 

Saponaria

 solution, ancient 

clothes were "laid out on bushes to dry" (Donadoni, 1978) Under such conditions, materials that 
are in solution or suspension in the wash water will concentrate at the drying surface. We 
hypothesize that evaporation / concentration can explain the superficial nature of the image. 

The commercial production of linen started during Medieval times: most commercial 

bleaching in Europe took place in "bleach fields" in the Low Countries, where completed pieces 
of cloth were spread out for bleaching. These medieval linens are homogeneous, whereas the 
shroud shows bands of different densities.  

 

Experimental production of image-like colours.   
 

Tests of image-formation hypotheses needed fresh material. However, modern linen is 

useless for experimental image-production purposes because it is vigorously bleached and been 
coated with sizing compounds and fluorescent fabric brighteners.  

Kate Edgerton (deceased, Norwich, CT) grew flax and made some linen, using both starch 

and 

Saponaria

. Unfortunately, she ironed the samples with a "warm iron" which coloured the 

cloth and changed the 

Saponaria 

glycosides. Edgerton's samples could be bleached to remove 

most of the colour by soaking in 3.5% hydrogen peroxide.  This treatment did not remove the 
natural waxes. That material was used in the reported experiments. 

Because Edgerton's linen was scarce, many preliminary tests were performed on pure-

cellulose filter paper. These experiments were done by placing drops of test solutions on a dry 
plastic plate and laying a piece of Whatman's #4 filter paper over them.  The liquid migrated 

background image

 

through the paper and evaporated at the surface. No colour could be observed in either sunlight or 
ultraviolet illumination with 

Saponaria

 alone  or with the model saccharides. The different 

samples were treated with ammonia vapour for different times. Light colours developed slowly 
on the tops of samples that contained reducing saccharides.  

A technical grade dextrin, that reduced Fehling's solution, was used to test crude-starch 

reactions. Paper was laid over different numbers of drops of dextrin, and the liquid was allowed 
to migrate into circular spots and evaporate. Samples were then laid over drops of 

Saponaria

 

solution, which caused the polysaccharides to move radially, as in a circular paper 
chromatogram. Afterwards, these samples were treated with ammonia that produced the 
development of a brown colour, which was more intense where the dextrin had been concentrated 
by migration at the 

Saponaria

-solution front and on the paper's surface. 

Very little colour was obtained when the same experiments were repeated with purified 

starch or plant gum. It was evident that colour development  required both reducing sugars and 
amines.   

 

 

After these successful experiments, a sample of Edgerton's bleached linen was placed on 

four drops of dextrin solution on a plastic plate. A round spot was obtained and the water was 
allowed to evaporate from the cloth: at this point no colour could be seen on either surface. The 
middle of the same sample was placed on four drops of 

Saponaria

 solution. The wet spot 

expanded radially through the cloth. The water was allowed to evaporate, and no colour could be 
observed. The sample was then treated for 10 minutes with ammonia vapour: a very light colour 
could be observed on the top surface after standing 24 hours at room temperature. To increase the 
reaction rate, a sample was treated at 66 ºC for a few minutes (Figure 2 above). In these 

background image

 

conditions the development of colour is very clear and the most intense colour appears in the ring 
on top. Some colour appears around the ring on the back surface; however, the centre of the back 
is nearly white.  

Experimental manipulations of concentrations and one-dimensional migration of solutions, 

as in a large cloth, could produce the same front-to-back colour separation as observed on the 
shroud.  

 

 

When observed under a microscope, the fibres on the top-most surface are the most 

coloured and the colour is a golden yellow similar to that on the shroud (Figure 3 above).   

 

 

 
The coating of brown products is too thin to be resolved with a light microscope, and it is 

all on the outside of the fibres. There is no coloration in the medullas: the colour does not scorch 
the cellulose. There is essentially no colour on fibres from the middle of the back surface (Figure 
4 above). 

 

DISCUSSION 
 

A large number of attempts have been made to reproduce the Shroud image by different 

methods, and many "theories" have been proposed (Vignon, 1970). All have failed when 
compared with observations and measurements on the Shroud and none of them was able to 
explain the experimental fact that only the surfaces of the fibres are coloured .  

Studies on contact and material-transfer hypotheses (Pellicori & Evans, 1981) eliminated 

hypotheses based solely on vapour-diffusion and/or material-transfer mechanism. Vapours and 

background image

 

liquids penetrate the cloth: materials that will colour the surface will also diffuse into and colour 
the inside of the cloth. 

Hot irons, statues, etc., must be ruled out, because different colours can be seen as a 

function of the depth into the cloth. Colour penetration is different for contact and non-contact 
areas, and fibres are coloured through their entire diameter. 

Other "theories" and attempts at image production have ranged from pseudoscience to the 

lunatic fringe. Many have involved unknown physics, some involving ionising radiation, 
postulated at the time of the Biblical resurrection (Antonacci, 2000). 

This is certainly the first report of colour development with features very similar to the 

Shroud obtained by a natural process on a cloth prepared following the procedure that was in use 
about 2000 years ago as it was described by Pliny the Elder.  This ancient technology used to 
leave residues of reducing sugars on the cloth both deriving from crude starch and 

S. officinalis

.   

The amino reactants required to develop colour may derive from a corpse. In fact 

decomposing bodies start producing ammonia and amines, e.g., cadaverine (1,5-diaminopentane) 
and putrescine (1,4-diaminobutane), fairly quickly, depending on the temperature and humidity. 
The ammonia and many of the amines are volatile, and they rapidly undergo Maillard reactions 
with any reducing saccharides they contact. It is well known that browning rates depend on pH: 
rates peak in the neutral to basic pH range, but rates are still rapid in the 3-7 pH range (Ledl and 
Schleicher, 1979)

1

.

  

Human sebaceous secretions are about 28% free fatty acids; therefore, human 

skin is normally slightly acid, but the developing amines should neutralize the medium increasing 
the reaction rate. 

Melanoidins, the brown polymeric materials coming from the Maillard reaction, although 

their structures are still rather elusive (Arnoldi et al, 2002), have certainly a highly unsaturated 
structure as observed for example by Cammerer and Kroh (1995). This seems in good agreement 
with the  fact that image fibres could be decolourised with strong reducing agents, indicating the 
presence of conjugated double bonds (Heller and Adler). 

Such sugar-amine reactions may offer a simple, realistic, natural explanation for the colour 

on the shroud. 

Several Shroud researchers have wondered why there is no mention of an image on the 

"cloths" reportedly found in Jesus' tomb. Assuming historical validity in the accounts, such a 
situation could be explained by the delay in the development of the Maillard reactions' colours at 
moderate temperatures. 

Another important observation is the fact that the image-forming process produced slightly 

different colour densities on the different lots of thread (Jumper et al., 1984). The density-density 
of the image is not simply a function of the chemical properties of cellulose: it also depends on 
the individual properties of the threads. The observed effects must have been caused by different 
amounts of impurities that originally coated the surfaces of the threads as a result of slightly 
different production conditions.  

Slightly different amounts of impurities on the linen threads would cause slightly different 

surface energies. Liquids would wet the threads as a function of the difference between the 
surface tension of the washing solution and the surface energy of the specific linen thread. This 
would explain the "banded" appearance of the Shroud.  

The chemistry of the colour does not answer all questions about how the "photographic" 

image formed. The image seems to show the body of a man, and it is darkest in areas that should 
have been closest to the body's surface.  

background image

 

Vapour diffusion parallel to the cloth's inner surface would follow Graham's Law, and high 

Maillard reaction rates would limit the spread of reactive amine vapours. Gaseous reactive 
amines can be lost by diffusion through the porous cloth, reducing concentrations and reaction 
rates inside the cloth. The surface area of cloth is large, and decomposition amines adsorb 
strongly. All of these phenomena would cause a rapid reduction in amine concentrations away 
from contact points.   

Postmortem body temperatures can reach 41ºC (Irvine, 2001), and steep temperature 

gradients would exist across the cloth as a result of the low thermal diffusivity of linen and the 
angular dependence of radiant heat flow from a nonmetallic surface (Gubareff et al, 1960). The 
temperature gradients will have a large effect on Maillard reaction rates. These combination of 
factors could produce a distribution of reaction products with the appearance of the image.   

 

The problem of radiocarbon age determination. 

 

In 1988 Damon et al. (1989) reported result of a radiocarbon age determination as 1260-

1390 with at least 95% confidence. The instruments and methodologies applied were certainly 
the best that could be used in the world, however that datation does not reflect the STURP 
observation on the linen-production technology and the chemistry of the fibres.  A detailed 
description of the characteristics of the fibres used for determination has not been reported, 
however the sample was cut very near to another sample given in 1973 to Professor Gilbert Raes 
of the Ghent Institute of Textile Technology.  

Some of the fibres of this latter sample are in the hands of R. Rogers who has observed a 

series of very peculiar characteristics that indicate very clearly that this sample is incoherent with 
the general features of Shroud. The most important experimental observations are the following 
(Rogers and Arnoldi, 2002): 

a)

 

An evident contamination with cotton fibres (easily recognizable from linen at the 

microscope), which do not appear in the other parts of Shroud. Cotton was practically unknown 
in ancient times and was introduced in use only around 1350. 

b)

 

Linen fibres in the Raes sample show at the microscope only traces of lignin at the 

nodes in comparison with the rest of Shroud, indicating a more modern technology for cloth 
preparation, which is confirmed by the chemical quantitative determination  of lignin. 

c)

 

All Reas threads show coloured encrustations on their surfaces that are lacking on 

the rest of Shroud. 

 
All these observations suggest that the sample for the radiocarbon age determination came 

from an area, which had been darned, a phenomenon that must not surprise, because the Shroud 
may have been restored during his complicate history, especially after it was damaged by a fire in 
1532. Therefore the 1988 radiocarbon age determination, which indicated that the Shroud was 
Medieval, seems highly unreliable. A second radiocarbon analysis should be very advisable, at 
least on the charred materials removed during the June-July 2002 restoration (Ghiberti, 2002). 

  

CONCLUSION.  
 

The chemical analyses performed by the STURP (Schwalbe and Rogers, 1982) are in good 

agreement with the Pliny description of ancient cloth technology, as extensively discussed 
recently by us (Rogers and Arnoldi, 2002):. 

background image

 

We can now formally propose a completely natural hypothesis for image  formation. 

Impurities in ancient linen could have been suspended by the surfactant property of a 

Saponaria 

officinalis

 washing solution and they would be concentrated at the cloth surface by evaporation. 

Reducing saccharides would react rapidly with the amine decomposition products of a dead body.  

This hypothesis is the first one, which can explain the very peculiar distribution of colour 

on the Shroud fibres. Such a natural image-production process would support the hypothesis that 
the Shroud of Turin had been a real shroud. However, these observations do not

 prove

 how the 

image was formed or the "authenticity" of the shroud.   

 
References.  
 

Antonacci, M. 

The Resurrection of the Shroud.

 M. Evans and Company, Inc., 216 East 49

th

 

St.,  New York, NY  10017. (2000). 

Arnoldi, A. Thermal processing and foods quality: analysis and control, in Richardson P,  

Thermal Technologies in Food Processing.

 Cambridge UK, Woodhead Publishing, pp. 138-159 

(2001). 

Arnoldi, A., Boschin, G. & D’Agostina, A. Melanoidins in foods. 

Res. Adv. Food Sci., 3

, 1-

10 (2002). 

Cämmerer, B. & Kroh,. L. W. Investigation of the influence of reaction conditions on the 

elementary composition of melanoidins. 

Food Chem.

 

53, 

55-59 (1995). 

Damon P.E., Donahue, D.J., Gore, B.H.; et al. Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin. 

Nature

337

, 611-615 (1989).  

Donadoni A. M. (1978) personal communication. 

Ghiberti, G. 

Shroud Images 2002

. Opera Diocesana Preservazione Fede, Turin, 2002. 

Gilbert, R. Jr.& Gilbert, M. Ultraviolet-visible reflectance and fluorescence spectra of the 

Shroud of Turin. 

Applied Optics 

19

, 1930-1936 (1980). 

Gubareff, G. G., Janssen, J. E. & Torborg, R. H. 

Thermal Radiation Properties Survey

(Minneapolis. Honeywell Research Center, Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 1960).

 

Heller, J. H. & Adler, A. D.  A chemical investigation of the Shroud of Turin. 

Canadian 

Society of Forensic Science Journal

 

14, 

81-103 (1981). 

Hochberg, B. 

Handspinner's Handbook

, summarized as Events in Textile History, 

Edgerton, K. & Knott, L., Eds. (Windham Center, CT, 1980). 

Irvine, R., Pathology Section, Office of the Medical Investigator, University of New 

Mexico, Albuquerque NM  87131, Personal communication (2001).

  

Jumper, E. J., Adler, A. D., Jackson, J. P., Pellicori, S. F., Heller, J. H. & Druzik, J. R. A      

comprehensive examination of the various stains and images on the Shroud of Turin. 

ACS 

Advances in Chemistry, Archaeological Chemistry 

III

 205,

 447-476 (1984). 

Ledl F. & Schleicher, E. New aspects of the Maillard reaction in foods and in the human 

body. 

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 

 

29

, 565-706 (1990).   

background image

 

Pellicori, S. F. & Evans, M. S. The Shroud of Turin Through the Microscope. 

Archaeology

January/February 35-43 (1981). 

Pliny the Elder  

Natural History

. Book 19, §48 (AD 77) 

Rogers R. N., Arnoldi A. Scientific method applied to the Shroud of Turin: a review. 

http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/rogers2.pdf

Rogers, R. N. Supportive comments on the Benford-Marino '16

th

 century repairs' 

hypothesis. 

British Society for the Turin Shroud, Shroud Newsletter 

54

, 28-33 (2001).  

Schwalbe, L. A. & Rogers, R. N. Physics and chemistry of the Shroud of Turin, a summary 

of the 1978 investigations. 

Analytica Chimica Acta

 135, 3-49 (1982). 

Vignon, P. 

The Shroud of Christ

 (1902), reprinted by University Books (1970). 

Ya Chirva, V., Kintya, P. K. & Lazur'evskii, G. Triterpene glycosides from 

Saponaria 

officinalis

Khim. Prir. Soedin

5, 

59-60 (1969).