1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Ancient / Classical History

Fall of Rome - Why Did Rome Fall?

Reasons for the decline and fall of the Roman Empire.

By N.S. Gill, About.com

Hadrian's Wall

Hadrian's Wall

NSGill
It's not entirely arbitrary that Medieval/Renaissance History at About.com begins and Ancient/Classical History ends in A.D. 476. Edward Gibbon's 476 date for the Fall of Rome is conventionally acceptable because that's when the Germanic Odoacer deposed the last Roman emperor to rule the western part of the Roman Empire. However, the people who lived through the takeover would probably be surprised by the importance we place on this event. And there are other, reasonably momentous dates for the Fall of the Roman Empire.

Some say the split into an eastern and western empire governed by separate emperors caused Rome to fall. The eastern half became the Byzantine Empire, with its capital at Constantinople (modern Istanbul). The western half remained centered in Italy. Many say the Fall of Rome was an ongoing process, lasting more than a century. Since Rome still exists, it is argued that it never fell. Some prefer to say that Rome adapted rather than fell. [For some more details, see Decline of Rome.] A related question, one subject to even more discussion is:

Why did Rome Fall?

There are adherents to single factors, but more people think a combination of such factors as Christianity, decadence, lead, monetary trouble, and military problems caused the Fall of Rome. Imperial incompetence and chance could be added to the list. Even the rise of Islam is proposed as the reason for Rome's fall, by some who think the Fall of Rome happened at Constantinople in A.D. 1453.

Historians of the Fall of Rome

The first major historian to deal with the decline and Fall of Rome was the 5th century historian Zosimus, but the best-known name connected with the Fall of Rome is Edward Gibbon. Historians of ancient Rome have long been fascinated with the fall of this powerful empire. Recently there has been a spate of books explaining it:

The Decline and Fall of Rome

The Roman Empire not only expanded but was modified by the conquered people. The structure of the Roman government changed to deal with new situations -- including moving the capital away from the city of Rome -- but not necessarily enough.

The Extent of the Empire at the Time of the Fall of Rome

Take a look at the maps to see the changing area of the Roman Empire. Rome started out as a small settlement in the middle of the Italian boot. By the time it was an empire, it looked completely different. Some of the theories on the Fall of Rome focus on the geographic diversity and extent of the territory the Roman emperors had to control.© NS Gill 4/25/09

Frontiers of the Roman Empire

Source: CR Whittaker's Frontiers of the Roman Empire.

The extensive empire put such a strain on Roman coffers Honorius sent letters to the Roman cities in England to tell them they'd have to fend for themselves. [The end of Roman Britain.]

By the third century it was sometimes hard to tell the Roman from the barbarian. In addition, Romans regularly employed the Huns and Vandals -- sometimes in double crosses.

Aetius, a Roman general, used the Huns in battles in Germany and Gaul, but then in 451 he used the Burgundians and Visigoths of the same region to fight against the Huns led by Attila.

In a factional struggle with the leadership in Ravenna, the Roman comes africae invited the Vandal King Geiseric to Africa.

© N.S. Gill for About.com.

Explore Ancient / Classical History

About.com Special Features

  1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Ancient / Classical History
  4. Greece and Rome
  5. Ancient Rome
  6. Empire - Roman Empire
  7. Fall of the Roman Empire
  8. Fall of Rome Articles
  9. Fall of Rome - Why Did Rome Fall

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.