Dr. Chaim Weizmann, who was to
become Israel's first President in 1948, is quoted in the Manchester Guardian
as saying: "The world seemed to be divided into two parts – those places where
the Jews could not live and those where they could not enter."1 His words were to become even more
poignant as events of the 1930s and 40s unfolded.
From 1933 when Hitler came to
power in Germany Jews were being expelled and a growing problem of refugees was
emerging but who were going to accommodate these refugees? The Evian Conference, called by President
Franklin D. Roosevelt in July 1938, was to address this urgent and pressing
issue and the questions to be addressed in this Dissertation are - why was The
Conference called? Was it for
humanitarian or political reasons? What
was the re-action to the invitation by countries that were considered to be
those of immigration? Some were world
leaders such as the United Kingdom with her colonies and dominions including
Australia and Canada with small populations and vast areas of land. What of Palestine which had been favoured by
the British Government in the Balfour Declaration of 1917 as a Homeland for the
Jewish people but had seen rebellion by the Arab Palestinians who opposed more
Jewish immigration and partition of the land?
What about the United States which, like Australia and New Zealand, had
marginalized their ethnic populations and become a land of immigration? Other smaller countries were well populated
already, how could they take more refugees? What was the attitude of the public
and press towards refugees in the light of unemployment? What would it mean to have a huge influx of
Jews if they caused problems with their dietary and other religious laws?
Did the Conference succeed? If not, why not, and what were the
consequences of the failure? Did
anything positive come from the Conference and what was the reaction of
Governments and the press to it? Was
there an element of anti-Semitism, especially among top government officials
and the press and what affect did this have on the refugee question?
In order to find the answers to these
questions the situation in the UK and its attitude to settlement of Jews in
Palestine and its colonies, Australia and Canada and the USA have been studied
regarding attitudes to Jewish refugees. The responses of delegates who attended
the conference, of government officials, the press, Jewish leaders and
observers and also their proposals for solutions to the problems encountered
have also been examined. The sources
used are taken from official documents of the countries involved such as
cabinet and state department papers, reports, from newspapers and from the
writings of people who attended the conference such as S. Adler-Rudel, who,
although expelled from Germany, was one of their official representatives of
Germany Jewry allowed by the Nazis to attend the conference, and Zionist
leader, Chaim Weizmann, Other well known and respected writers of books on the
subject include Henry Feingold, John Mendelsohn, Michael Marrus, Irving Abella
and Harold Troper, Michael Blakeney,
and Louise London whose pains-taking research and use of material from
Government records and public statements to the press and in governmental
debate is outstanding. Most books have
tackled the refugee issue in one specific country but this Dissertation
attempts to bring a wider view of the problem of Jewish refugees fleeing from
Nazi aggression.
Go to Chapter 1 - Why Was The Conference Called?
©2001 Annette Shaw