Index of Species Information

SPECIES:  Castilleja occidentalis


Introductory

SPECIES: Castilleja occidentalis
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Williams, Tara Y. 1990. Castilleja occidentalis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [].

ABBREVIATION : CASOCC SYNONYMS : Castilleja parvula SCS PLANT CODE : CAOC4 COMMON NAMES : western paintbrush western painted cup TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of western paintbrush is Castilleja occidentalis Torr. LIFE FORM : Forb FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : Western paintbrush is rare in northwestern Montana and Glacier National Park, where it is at the edge of its range [10].


DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Castilleja occidentalis
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Western paintbrush occurs in the Rocky Mountains from British Columbia, Alberta, and Montana south to Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico. It is not known to occur in Idaho or Wyoming. In Montana, it has been found only in Glacier National Park [10]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES20 Douglas-fir FRES23 Fir - spruce FRES37 Mountain meadows FRES44 Alpine STATES : CO MT NM UT AB BC BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 11 Southern Rocky Mountains 12 Colorado Plateau KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K012 Douglas-fir forest K015 Western spruce - fir forest K021 Southwestern spruce - fir forest K052 Alpine meadows and barren SAF COVER TYPES : 206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir 210 Interior Douglas-fir SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : NO-ENTRY

MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS

SPECIES: Castilleja occidentalis
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : NO-ENTRY PALATABILITY : Palatability of western paintbrush has been rated as fair to good for sheep, poor to fair for cattle, and poor for horses [2]. NUTRITIONAL VALUE : Western paintbrush has poor energy value and poor protein value. Its forage value has been rated as good for mule deer and fair for elk, upland game birds, nongame birds, and small mammals [2]. COVER VALUE : Western paintbrush may provide cover for some small mammals [2]. VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : Growth of western paintbrush is good on moderate slopes and fair on steep slopes. It has low to medium erosion-control potential. Establishment requirements are medium. Revegetation and biomass production potentials are low [2]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : NO-ENTRY OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Western paintbrush often occurs in fragile, wet meadows that are subject to damage from trampling by humans and ungulates [9].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Castilleja occidentalis
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Western paintbrush is a woody-based, native, perennial, autotrophic forb that grows 2 to 8 inches (5-20 cm) tall. It has a short, dense inflorescence, which is predominately yellow but varies to red and purple and displays all intermediate colors [5,6,13,16]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Hemicryptophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Western paintbursh reproduces sexually by pollination and fertilization and dispersal of resulting seed [2]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Western paintbrush grows in the high mountains on alpine slopes or meadows, and on talus or rock slides. It is common above timberline. It grows best on sandy loam or loam. Western paintbrush grows in areas with late snowmelt. It is often associated with tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa), golden avens (Geum rossii), and Bellard kobresia (Kobresia myosuroides) [2,6,13,15,16]. In several western states, western paintbrush occurs at the following elevational ranges: 10,500 to 13,000 feet (3,385-4,195 m) in Colorado [5] 6,500 to 7,500 feet (2,095-2,420 m) in Montana [9] 10,100 to 11,160 feet (3,260-3,600 m) in Utah [16] SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : NO-ENTRY SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Western paintbrush generally flowers in July and August [6]. Flowering may begin as early as June in Montana and may end as late as September in Colorado and Montana [2].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Castilleja occidentalis
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : NO-ENTRY POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Caudex, growing points in soil

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Castilleja occidentalis
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : NO-ENTRY DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : NO-ENTRY DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : NO-ENTRY

References for species: Castilleja occidentalis


1. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
2. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
3. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
4. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
5. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press Inc. 666 p. [6851]
6. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur; Ownbey, Marion. 1959. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 4: Ericaceae through Campanulaceae. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 510 p. [1170]
7. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954]
8. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
9. Lesica, Peter. 1984. Rare vascular plants of Glacier National Park, Montana. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, Department of Botany. 27 p. [12049]
10. Lesica, P.; Moore, G.; Peterson, K. M.; Rumely, J. H. 1984. Vascular plants of limited distribution in Montana. Monograph No. 2. Proceedings, Montana Academy of Sciences. 43(Supplement): 1-61. [11656]
11. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 10 p. [20090]
12. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
13. Standley, Paul C. 1921. Flora of Glacier National Park, Montana. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium. Vol. 22, Part 5. Washington, DC: United States National Museum, Smithsonian Institution: 235-438. [12318]
14. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
15. Welden, Charles. 1985. Structural pattern in alpine tundra vegetation. American Journal of Botany. 72(1): 120-134. [8267]
16. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]


FEIS Home