Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3Rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Big 4 Organised Music gang’s RIAA

p2pnet news view | RIAA News:- Since I started running stories about the P2P file sharing travesty initiated by the major record labels, I’ve had four or five emails complaining about the fact I refer to the perpetrators as the Big 4, the organised music cartel/gang, and so on. And I had another yesterday complaining about that, and the pic I used for Maine students target RIAA ‘discovery’ machine.

Check the pic out, but if you don’t want to be bothered, it features a flock of vultures with the caption, ‘RIAA legal staff mull tactics over lunch’.

Anyway, “You are WRONG!!! - said the email among other things (more on that anon).

“There are a lot more than 4 record labels in the RIAA and they don’t own it, they are only members of it.”

Yes, there are a lot more then four companies listed as members but, “To all intents and purposes, EMI (Britain), Vivendi Universal (France), Sony BMG (Japan and Germany) and Warner Music (US) are the only record labels in town,” I wrote a while back, going on >>>

In much the same way Organized Crime is universally known as OC, p2pnet calls the Big 4 the Organized Music cartel.

Because what they say goes. Their demands dictate corporate policy and they’re principally responsible for instructing the many and various ‘trade’ copyright enforcement units such as the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America), BPI (British Phonographic Industry), IFPI (International Federation of Phonographic Industry) and CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association of America).”

Recording Industry vs The People has a list of the record labels which show up most often on the RIAA’s Frequent Plaintiff List.

They are: Arista; Atlantic; BMG; Capitol; Elektra; Fonovisa; Interscope; Lava; Loud; Maverick; Motown Priority; SONY; UMG; Virgin; and, Warner.

Separate companies. Right?

Nope. They’re part and parcel of the Big 4.

I did a by no means exhaustive search to see who owned them and here’s what I found:

  • Arista is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sony BMG
  • Atlantic is owned by the Warner Music Group
  • BMG is the German half of the Sony BMG partnership
  • Capitol is owned by EMI
  • Elektra is owned by the Warner Music Group
  • Interscope is owned by Vivendi’s Universal Music Group
  • Lava is owned by owned by Warner Music Group
  • Loud is owned by UMG
  • Priority Records is owned by EMI
  • Maverick is owned by the Warner Music Group
  • Motown Priority is owned by Vivendi’s Universal Music Group
  • SONY is the Japanese half of the Sony BMG partnership
  • UMG is Vivendi’s Universal Music Group
  • Virgin Music is owned by EMI
  • Warner Music Group is Warner Music

Only Fonovisa Records, an American Spanish language label, has the slightest appearance of being separate from the Big 4.

It’d be interesting to know exactly how many other companies on the long RIAA list are associated directly or at a distance with one or other of the Big 4.

Meanwhile, to go back to the idea that the Big 4 are the only game in town, in January, Colorado’s Law Weekly ran an article on Richard ‘Rich’ (he probably is by now) Gabriel, the Holme Roberts & Owen RIAA attack lawyer, says a link provided by a p2pnet reader.

Reproduced in full by HR&O, it extols Gabriel’s virtues in fulsome detail (I wouldn’t advise reading it on a full stomach).

It says, in part, “Gabriel’s - and the Recording Industry Association of America’s - case against a Minnesota mother of two has been called one of the most publicized cases in U.S. patent law in 2007. It was the first [and is still the only] case to go to trial against a defendant accused of illegally downloading music on the Internet. The record companies claimed Jammie Thomas, 30, of Brainerd downloaded 1,702 songs to her computer from the music site Kazaa. The record labels then sent Thomas a letter with a settlement offer. But instead of settling for a nominal amount (typically $4,000), Thomas declined.”

Four thousand dollars may be nominal to the multi-billion-dollar Big 4 and to Gabriel, who pulls $375 an hour, plus expenses and disbursements, for his labours of behalf of the organise music gang. But it most certainly isn’t nominal to Thomas or any of the other 30,000 also very ordinary RIAA victims, who include children as young as 12.

But to return to my thesis, me judice, the Big 4 are where it’s at and to all intents and purposes, they alone ultimately control what the various so-called corporate music industry trade associations say and do, and, using the likes of Richard ‘Rich’ Gabriel as their fronts, they alone are responsible for putting their own  customers through hell, calling them criminals and thieves.

“Gabriel serves as national counsel to the recording industry association, as well as the specific record companies involved in the lawsuit, including Capitol Records, Inc., Sony BMG, Arista, Interscope Records, Warner Bros. and UMG Recordings, Inc,” says Law Weekly, from which I clipped a section of Chris Williams’ excellent photo of Gabriel.

  • Capitol = EMI
  • Arista = Sony BMG
  • Interscope Records = Universal Music Group
  • Warner = Warner

Say no more.

Jon Newton - p2pnet

SlashdotSlashdot it! Add to Technorati Favorites


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

15 Responses to “Big 4 Organised Music gang’s RIAA”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    If we blow up this four companies, Vivendi Universal, Sony/BMG, EMI, Time Warner, we basically get ride of the RIAA and the lawsuit will stop. Now we will have to raid the property of these company executives to compensate the innocent victims.

  2. Ray Beckerman Says:

    Fonovisa is not independent, it’s an affiliate of Universal.
    The only RIAA members that participate in the litigation vendetta are the big 4 and their affiliated labels.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    At $375 an hour, you’d think Rich Gabriel could afford a good dentist.

    If you’re going to be an evil vermin, at least look good on the outside.

  4. Jon Says:

    He lost some of his choppers when I converted from colour to B/W.

    Take a look at the original pic - http://www.hro.com/resources/custom/publications/GabrielLawWeek.pdf.

    Cheers!

  5. Alter_Fritz Says:

    While I know of the problems photographers have with taking protraits of glasses wearers (have the head tilted in a way that the lights do not reflect to much in them) me wonders why “Rich” seems to have glasses that looks as if they are not yery well coated with anti-reflective coating “entspiegelt in german”.
    If at all, the slight greenish tone seems to indicate only a cheap (as in quality not necessary price he might have paid for it) one.
    Don’t offer american optician’s different qualitty/grades of anti reflective coating like you can get in germany offered for different prizes or is “Rch” just a cheap guy?

    Do do not vilify him for his spotty chin region, Man generally don’t give so much about their apearance and her facehygiene!

  6. Don Peters Says:

    Now I know what a scumbag looks like. Why not post more of these so we can recognize them when we see them? I want to practice my forearm smash on deserving individuals. Let them try suing ME.

  7. Alter_Fritz Says:

    Don Peters
    at least hro has a very friendly interface to get tphotos and Info about their lawyers on their website.

    you can search for them by first name last name and other criteria
    http://www.hro.com/people

    Rich for example is their number 70
    http://www.hro.com/people/bio?id=70

    P.S. a new nice press release!
    Mr. Gabriel is now “Super Lawyer”
    Someone can photoshop him an “S” on his suit picture please?! :-)

    “Press Release
    Twenty-Eight HRO Attorneys Named Colorado Super Lawyers

    03/24/08
    Holme Roberts & Owen LLP (HRO) is pleased to announce that 28 attorneys from its Denver office were named by their peers as 2008 Colorado Super Lawyers.
    [...]Richard Gabriel was chose in the area of General Litigation;[...]”
    LOL!
    http://www.hro.com/pressRelease?highlightID=68

    P.S. P.S
    I do not encourage physical violence against any of those RIAA lawyers. They aren’t worth it to get in trouble with the law. If you believe in a supernatural being trust in him, he will sort it out!

    Those evil persons will normaly die by nasty illnesses like colon cancer or something similar unpleasant :-)

  8. Kame Says:

    Ahahaha, looks like they have SOME feelings after all. “Wah wah wah, you’re being mean and calling us names. We want you to stop this at once!”

  9. Reader's Write Says:

    Isn’t this misrepresenting? If all these companies are listed in a lawsuit, is that legal? Likewise, the defendant could create four dozen dummy companies and say that they represent them as well.

  10. Reader's Write Says:

    I think you have touched a nerve. The link to the Holme Roberts & Owen re-print of the Gabriel article has been taken down. It now says Not Founnd ;)

  11. RichardL.Gabriel Says:

    Nothing gets lost in those internets tubes!

    Bittorrent technology to the rescue!

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4120316

  12. Reader's Write Says:

    I wonder how these guys sleep at night knowing they work
    for one of the most hated organizations in the World?

    Or that they could befall a similar fate to that lawyer for
    Logistep, who was disbarred for six months after sending
    file sharers threatening letters over the Call Of Juarez game?

  13. Reader's Write Says:

    “I think you have touched a nerve. The link to the Holme Roberts & Owen re-print of the Gabriel article has been taken down. It now says Not Founnd”

    It’s still there; just delete the period at the end of the link:

    http://www.hro.com/resources/custom/publications/GabrielLawWeek.pdf

  14. Reader's Write Says:

    “I wonder how these guys sleep at night”

    They lay awake at night thinking up ways to JUSTIFY their behaviour.
    That’s how everybody else who walk all over other people do it .

  15. Jon Says:

    @ Don Peters > “Why not post more of these so we can recognize them when we see them?”

    See http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15505 - the first of many ;)

    Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
GigaNews
 


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®